Tag Archives: artificial intelligence

Register of Copyrights informed of Warner Bros. Consolidated Action with Disney and Universal against Midjourney

In September, Warner Bros. Discovery filed a lawsuit against Midjourney. In it, they claim the tech company “brazenly dispenses its intellectual property as if it were its own.” Warner Bros. Discovery is accusing Midjourney of producing, displaying, and distributing “unauthorized derivatives” of its intellectual property including Superman, Wonder Woman, Batman, Bugs Bunny, Scooby-Doo, and more. Warner Bros. Discovery further claims Midjourney is aware of its “breathtaking scope of its piracy and copyright infringement.”

Now, as part of the court proceedings, the Register of Copyright has been informed that the action which was filed on September 4 by Warner Bros. Discovery is now consolidated with the similar case filed by Disney and Universal in June 2025.

In short, they’ve given the Register of Copyrights that the case which was two, is now 1, and the Disney earlier-filed case is the Lead Case with any following filings being only under the lead case.

Not the sexiest or most exciting of filings but important for those paying attention and needing to keep up with what’s going on.

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

Warner Bros. Discovery Supports Disney and Universal’s actions their Lawsuit against Midjourney

Last week, Disney, Warner Bros. Discovery, and Universal started the court filings to combine their lawsuits against Midjourney, the AI platform. The companies are suing Midjourney for infringement and plagiarism. Disney and Universal filed a lawsuit together in June and then Warner Bros. Discovery filed their own lawsuit in September.

After the initial filing by Disney to combine the cases and form like Voltron, Warner Bros. Discovery has submitted their own statement in support of it and what Disney and Universal have done so far in their case. In October Midjourney responded to the lawsuit in court and the discovery plan was submitted.

While it’s not the sexiest of news, it is a step in what will be a lawsuit that will drag on for a year or two.

Loading Viewer…

Disney, Universal, and Warner Bros. Consolidate their Cases Against Midjourney

In June, Disney and Universal launched a lawsuit against the AI platform, Midjourney. In their filing, they called it a “bottomless pit of plagiarism” that generates “endless unauthorized copies.” In September, Warner Bros. Discovery, along with its various divisions, also sued Midjourney accusing it of producing, displaying, and distributing “unauthorized derivatives” of its intellectual property including Superman, Wonder Woman, Batman, Bugs Bunny, Scooby-Doo, and more. Now, Disney, Universal, and Warner Bros. Discovery have formed a supergroup consolidating their cases.

None of this is surprising, the two court cases are very similar not just in their claims but their arguments as well.

In the filing it says:

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a court to consolidate actions pending before it if those actions involve a “common question of law or fact” and a court may consider several factors that would affect the litigation including the burden on parties, witnesses, judicial resources, the risk of inconsistent adjudications, the potential for prejudice, and the risk of delaying trial”

the Disney/Universal Action and the Warner Bros. Discovery Action involve similar facts and circumstances, share similar causes of action, would require the Court to make similar determinations of law and fact, and as such, satisfy the requirement for consolidation under Rule 42(a)

In short, there’s a lot of overlap and things might get delayed and be hard to juggle since it’s the same defendant and the similar cases. So, to increase efficiency and decrease duplicating work, procedures, and avoiding “inconsistent adjudications,” they’re asking to combine the cases.

There’s some details that need to work out, like discovery.

Check out the joint stipulation below.

Loading Viewer…

Anthropic’s $1.5 billion Copyright Settlement Gets Preliminary Approval

Anthropic

The $1.5 billion settlement by Anthropic over the use of the works of authors to train AI is back on the table. In early September, the record setting agreement was announced by Anthropic and lawyers representing authors but that agreement was rejected by the judge for the case due to multiple concerns.

Now, U.S. District Judge William Alsup has called the class-action settlement “fair” during a hearing that took place on Thursday.

The next step is to notify the affected authors and give them a chance to file claims.

Anthropic is accused of using millions of pirated of books to teach its AI assistant Claude to respond to prompts.

The case has been interesting as Anthropic had been cleared from some of its wrongdoing with the judge ruling that training their model on purchased work was “exceedingly transformative.” Where Anthropic ran into issues was its use of pirated material in that training. About 7 million pirated books were saved to a “central library.”

As reported earlier, the settlement would cover anything done before a certain date but any new infractions after could lead to further lawsuits. Anthropic would also destroy the datasets used in its models. The settlement would amount to about $3,000 per class work.

A trial was set to begin in December over the piracy. Potential damages would have been in the hundreds of billions of dollars.

Judge Recuses Himself in Warner Bros. vs. Midjourney

In September, Warner Bros. Discovery along with Hanna-Barbera Productions, Turner Entertainment, DC Comics, and The Cartoon Network sued AI startup Midjourney claiming the tech company “brazenly dispenses its intellectual property as if it were its own.” The filing was submitted September 4. The case was assigned to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. Now, one of those judges, Percy Anderson, has recused himself from the case.

The reason in the document is listed as 28 U.S.C. section 455 which is basically a bunch of conflicts like impartiality, personal bias, a financial interest, some connection to the case, and many more.

The case has been reassigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt.

Loading Viewer…

Judge rejects the $1.5 billion Anthropic AI Settlement with Authors Due to Lack of Details

Anthropic

It was a record setting settlement by Anthropic to authors and it has been rejected by Judge William Alsup with much more to be done. The federal judge has concerns with a $1.5 billion settlement deal and it’ll be forced “down the throat of authors.”

The judge reportedly felt misled by the deal and that it was “nowhere close to complete.” The judge said he was disappointed that counsel have left important questions to be answered in the future.” Questions include some key ones like the list of works involved in the case, the list of authors, the process of notifying members of the class and the claim form members can use to get their settlement payment.

Anthropic was sued for using the works of authors to train its AI model. In the case, U.S. District Judge William Aslup ruled that Anthropic’s use of the books in training models was “exceedingly transformative,” a factor to determine if the use was under legal “fair use.” It was a major decision, the first concerning the issue. But, there was still a question of Anthropic pirating books from the internet to train its models, which would still need to settled in a trial.

In short, they were covered with what they purchased but there was all of the other stuff they pirated that was left to be decided if that was legal or not.

Anthropic in the settlement would have paid $1.5 billion and destroyed datasets used in its models.

About 500,000 authors were involved and they’d have received about $3,000 per work.

The lawyers need to give the class members “very good notice” about the settlement as well as design as claim form where those authors can opt in or out. Anthropic also can’t be sued for the same issue in the future as part of all of this.

The lawyers have until September 15 to submit a final list of works involved in the lawsuit. A class members list and claims form need to be examined and approved by the court by October 10.

After all of that, the court might grant preliminary approval.

(via Bloomberg Law)

Anthropic has agreed to pay $1.5 billion to Settle an AI Lawsuit with Authors

Anthropic logo

As we bring the news of Warner Bros. Discovery’s lawsuit against Midjourney, another case involving AI and theft is being settled. Anthropic has agreed to pay at least $1.5 billion into a class action fund as part of a settlement. The litigation was brought by a group of book authors.

The settlement releases Anthropic for it conduct up to August 25. That means new claims could be filed for any conduct after that date. Anthropic will also destroy the datasets used in its models.

The settlement amount is about $3,000 per class work.

A hearing in the case is scheduled for September 8. A “settlement in principle” was previously announced by Anthropic and the creators.

In the case, U.S. District Judge William Aslup ruled that Anthropic’s use of the books in training models was “exceedingly transformative,” a factor to determine if the use was under legal “fair use.” It was a major decision, the first concerning the issue. But, there was still a question of Anthropic pirating books from the internet to train its models, which would still need to settled in a trial.

Even though they’ll be paying $1.5 billion, it is a win for Antropic and possibly other AI companies allowing them to purchase a copy of the work, and then train their model off of it.

While $3,000 might not seem like a lot, it’s more than the $750 statutory damages amount a jury could award and more than the $200 amount if Anthropic were to prevail on its defense of innocent infringement.

Warner Bros. Discovery is suing Midjourney Over Use of its Property

Warner Bros Discovery Midjourney examples with Wonder Woman

2025 is absolutely going down as the year of the comic related lawsuit. We have Diamond’s chapter 11 along with all of the side suits, then there’s artists suing Cadence Comic Art. Now, Warner Bros. Discovery, along with Hanna-Barbera Productions, Turner Entertainment, DC Comics, and The Cartoon Network are suing AI startup Midjourney claiming the tech company “brazenly dispenses its intellectual property as if it were its own.” The filing was submitted September 4.

In June, Disney and Universal decided to sue Midjourney calling it a “bottomless pit of plagiarism.” In a filing, Warner Bros. Discovery highlighted that case as related.

Warner Bros. Discovery is accusing Midjourney of producing, displaying, and distributing “unauthorized derivatives” of its intellectual property including Superman, Wonder Woman, Batman, Bugs Bunny, Scooby-Doo, and more.

What’s interesting is that Warner Bros. Discovery claims that Midjourney is infringing even if specific characters aren’t mentioned. Using “classic comic book superhero battle” brings up characters like Superman, Flash, and Batman.

Warner Bros. Discovery further claims Midjourney is aware of its “breathtaking scope of its piracy and copyright infringement” but refuses to protect copyright holders.

It is hard to imagine copyright infringement that is any more willful than what Midjourney is doing here. Midjourney is purposefully exploiting Warner Bros. Discovery’s valuable intellectual property to attract subscribers to Midjourney, and it is profiting by providing subscribers with endless copies and derivatives of Warner Bros. Discovery’s Copyrighted Works.

In the filing there’s numerous examples comparing Warner Bros. Discovery’s original art and output by Midjourney and it goes into depth of representatives of the AI company admitting they don’t seek permission to use work protected by copyright as well as its use by individuals posted to various social media sites like Reddit, Instagram, Discord, and more.

Warner Bros. Discovery is seeking damages as well as the court to block Midjourney from copying, displaying, or distributing its intellectual property. It also wants Midjourney to stop offering AI tools without copyright protection measures.

Check out the initial filings below which are packed with examples from Warner Bros. Discovery:

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

GalaxyCon Announces a Sweeping AI Art Ban

GalaxyCon

After an issue at this past weekends Dragon Con where a vendor was removed for selling AI generated items, GalaxyCon has announced a ban on all AI-generated art from its shows, effective immediately. This ban applies to artists, exhibitors, and guests at GalaxyCon’s roster of shows, including: GalaxyCon, Nightmare Weekend, Animate!, and Superstar Comic Con Conventions. GalaxyCon has updated its terms and conditions for anyone exhibiting at its shows with a zero-tolerance policy towards AI-generated art. 

The way artificial intelligence is currently being trained presents many ethical and moral issues that simply can no longer be ignored in our industry. GalaxyCon has a long, proud history of supporting artists and their creativity, and we will continue to do so as the fight against unethical AI continues.

– Mike Broder, Founder and President of GalaxyCon

GalaxyCon is the largest geek culture convention organization in North America, with 18 shows scheduled for 2025 and 20 shows for 2026. In 2024, GalaxyCon shows brought in $42 million to local economies, a number that is projected to double in 2025.

FAN EXPO Canada Kicks Off with Bell Canada AI Controversy

FAN EXPO Canada is going on this weekend taking place at the taking place at the Metro Toronto Convention Centre. One of the bigger conventions that takes, place it brings in all sorts of celebrities and fans for the weekend celebrating fandoms. The convention kicked off with an issue with one exhibitor though, Bell Canada.

Bell Canada is an internet and tv service provider in Canada and has decided to spend its money for a booth where individuals can get a free photo booth photo of themselves… done up with AI. Yes, at a convention that celebrates creativity, Bell Canada thought it was a good idea to feature a booth that is based off of stolen art.

The use of AI is controversial as it:

  1. Has a highly negative impact on the environment;
  2. It negatively impacts water and electric infrastructure for communities;
  3. Is trained on the works of others, thus considered by many as theft.

That’s the short version.

To add insult to injury, the booth is not far from Artist Alley, an area that is usually filled with individuals who have created their wares on their own and not using AI to do it for them. The type of art that things like an AI photo booth would steal from. The fact it’s a FREE item, potentially distracting and taking away from individuals who are there to sell product, doesn’t help as well. One commentor stated this was a trial run for the company, and if it goes well, they’ll bring it to other conventions.

The con letting that happen tells you exactly what they think of artists.

While there’s policies on FAN EXPO Canada’s site barring IP/copyright theft by exhibitors, we haven’t found one that’s an outright ban on the use of AI. An important question that should be asked is, what are attendees who partake giving up by doing so?

It’s just more gasoline on the fire for a debate that’s been raging for some time when it comes to who should and shouldn’t be exhibiting at conventions and the battle over the use of AI.

You don't need to be shy. You can call them out. It's Bell. They have a huge space and this is how they're using it at Fan Expo. 🤦‍♂️🤮

Denis *B*L*M* (@quaidrayn.bsky.social) 2025-08-22T01:20:26.574Z
« Older Entries Recent Entries »