Tag Archives: massive publishing

Publishers Motion to Dismiss Diamond’s Adversary Complaints

Diamond Comic Distributors

One of the major outstanding issues with Diamond‘s bankruptcy is the status of consignment inventory. Diamond currently has stock that was provided to it by publishers on a consignment basis. That stock is currently physically held by Sparkle Pop which purchased some of Diamond’s assets, including taking over the warehouse where these are stored, though they don’t have a right to sell it (which they did and there was drama around that).

Diamond wants to sell the consigned goods to help pay back its creditors. Publishers obviously want their stock back. A judge put a stay on the decision which has been playing out for months. Diamond then went a submitted adversary proceedings against publishers, over 30 of them. In short, instead of this decision being handled at a macro level, the judge said Diamond could sue each publisher individually to figure out the product status.

Now, Diamond is in chapter 7 and due to key dates having passed, the Consignment Group, which is made up of multiple publishers, has submitted motions in each of those adversary proceedings to dismiss the complaints. Oddly a filing had the Trustee of the chapter 7 process selling the consigned goods to Sparkle Pop so it’s unclear how this motion and that clashes.

Filings by Massive Publishing, Oni Press, Panini, Alien Books, Titan Comics, Vault Storyworks, Dynamic Forces, Aspen, Black Mask Studio, Dark Horse, DSTLRY, Heavy Metal, and Magnetic Press were all revealed today were submitted to the court to “Dismiss Adversary Proceeding Complaint(s).”

The motion goes right into it stating that Diamond has not submitted facts to back up their complaint and discovery has not revealed evidence, and that the court can dismiss it over this.

The Complaint(s) in this case is devoid of any meritorious allegations that might possibly support Plaintiff’s claims; thus, this Complaint must be dismissed.

The filing then goes on about the agreement between Diamond and the publishers saying it’s “executory in nature” and Diamond’s obligations were to ship goods, properly store the goods, and pay the publishers when the goods ae sold.

On December 19, 2025, Diamond’s Chapter 11 was switched to Chapter 7 and with that, they had until February 17, 2026 to assume or reject an executory contract. The deadline to assume or reject their contracts has been an issue throughout the Chapter 11/Chapter 7 case with the deadline to do so pushed out over and over. The latest request to extend the deadline was denied in early February.

February 17 has come and gone and since the deadline wasn’t extended again and the agreements weren’t assumed, then they can be deemed rejected.

Because the agreement has been rejected, they are now terminated the Consignment Group argues and the agreement is now in breach and the next steps due to that breach need to be determined.

The Consignment Group feels the agreement has answers to that and as per a Supreme Court case, the publishers would then retain the rights it has received under the agreement. The motion lists out the various ways the agreement can be terminated (something we have mentioned before) and then goes on to state since the Consignors are owed money still and no proof of claim has been filed, the agreement has been terminated by its own terms.

The agreement lays out what happens next:

  1. Effect of Termination
    d. Except as provided herein, the termination of this Agreement shall not relieve or release any party from any of its obligations existing prior to such termination. Upon termination of this Agreement, title to all material containing the
    Trademarks, or Seller’s copyrights, service marks, or similar rights shall be deemed to have automatically vested in Seller. Unless otherwise agreed to by Seller, Buyer shall immediately deliver such material to Seller, at Seller’s cost. Buyer, at Seller’s option, may destroy such material at Seller’s cost, and upon such destruction furnish Seller a certificate of destruction satisfactory to Seller and signed by an officer of Buyer.

In short, the Buyer (aka Diamond) needs to return the goods to the Seller (aka publishers) with the Sellers paying for shipping. The Buyer can also destroy the material if the Seller wants, with the Seller paying for that.

The Consignment Group’s motion then concludes that due to all of that, the consigned goods are now clearly owned by the publishers and the Adversary Complaints should be dismissed.

This is a pretty big motion that might be the first real step to settle the outstanding question as to who owns the consigned goods. With the lapse of the date concerning the acceptance or rejection of existing agreements, the publisher’s case gets stronger.

We’ll be watching this closely and report when the court makes a decision regarding this key issue.

Astrobots Vol. 2 #4 is some steps back as it backs in a lot into the issue that’s too similar

Simon Furman, writer of the original Transformers comic series, creator of Marvel’s Death’s Head, and writer of Astrobots Volume 1 has teamed up with Philip Knott, known for his work on IDW’s Transformers: Last Bot Standing to continue the Mecha-Masterwork based on the toyline designed by Aaron Thomas.

Pathfinders, Pioneers…breaking new ground in the furthest reaches of the galaxy…they are – ASTROBOTS.

Creator/Editor: Aaron Thomas
Story: Simon Furman
Art: Phillip Knott
Letterer: Phillip Knott

Get your copy now! To find a comic shop near you, visit http://www.comicshoplocator.com or call 1-888-comicbook or digitally and online with the links below.

Zeus Comics


This post contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links and make a purchase, we’ll receive a percentage of the sale. Graphic Policy does purchase items from this site. Making purchases through these links helps support the site

Astrobots Vol. 2 #3 is an improvement on the previous issues as it narrows its focus of the story

Simon Furman, writer of the original Transformers comic series, creator of Marvel’s Death’s Head, and writer of Astrobots Volume 1 has teamed up with Philip Knott, known for his work on IDW’s Transformers: Last Bot Standing to continue the Mecha-Masterwork based on the toyline designed by Aaron Thomas.

Pathfinders, Pioneers…breaking new ground in the furthest reaches of the galaxy…they are – ASTROBOTS.

Creator/Editor: Aaron Thomas
Story: Simon Furman
Art: Phillip Knott
Letterer: Phillip Knott

Get your copy now! To find a comic shop near you, visit http://www.comicshoplocator.com or call 1-888-comicbook or digitally and online with the links below.

Zeus Comics


This post contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links and make a purchase, we’ll receive a percentage of the sale. Graphic Policy does purchase items from this site. Making purchases through these links helps support the site

Astrobots Vol. 2 #2 continues to do far too much in the issue resulting in a jumble mess

Simon Furman, writer of the original Transformers comic series, creator of Marvel’s Death’s Head, and writer of Astrobots Volume 1 has teamed up with Philip Knott, known for his work on IDW’s Transformers: Last Bot Standing to continue the Mecha-Masterwork based on the toyline designed by Aaron Thomas. Pathfinders, Pioneers…breaking new ground in the furthest reaches of the galaxy…they are – ASTROBOTS.

Creator/Editor: Aaron Thomas
Story: Simon Furman
Art: Phillip Knott
Letterer: Phillip Knott

Get your copy now! To find a comic shop near you, visit http://www.comicshoplocator.com or call 1-888-comicbook or digitally and online with the links below.

Zeus Comics


This post contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links and make a purchase, we’ll receive a percentage of the sale. Graphic Policy does purchase items from this site. Making purchases through these links helps support the site

Astrobots Vol. 2 #1 Overloads Readers as it Packs too Much in to Kick off the New Volume

Simon Furman, writer of the original Transformers comic series, creator of Marvel’s Death’s Head, and writer of Astrobots Volume 1 has teamed up with Philip Knott, known for his work on IDW’s Transformers: Last Bot Standing to continue the Mecha-Masterwork based on the toyline designed by Aaron Thomas. Pathfinders, Pioneers…breaking new ground in the furthest reaches of the galaxy…they are – ASTROBOTS.

Creator/Editor: Aaron Thomas
Story: Simon Furman
Art: Phillip Knott
Letterer: Phillip Knott

Get your copy now! To find a comic shop near you, visit http://www.comicshoplocator.com or call 1-888-comicbook or digitally and online with the links below.

Zeus Comics


This post contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links and make a purchase, we’ll receive a percentage of the sale. Graphic Policy does purchase items from this site. Making purchases through these links helps support the site

More Last Minute Filings in Diamond’s Chapter 11 Case Before Monday’s Hearing including Facts and Economic Interest

Monday is a big day in Diamond’s Chapter 11 case and will feature discussion of multiple motions that have yet to be decided. One of the bigger motions is Diamond’s motion to approve procedures for sale or other disposition of consigned inventory. In short, Diamond wants to sell inventory from publishers to help pay back it’s loan from the bank. There’s dispute as to who owns that property.

Last minute filings are coming in before the hearing begins.

A group of publishers that includes Aspen, Black Mask Studios, DSTLRY, Dynamic Forces/Dynamite, Heavy Metal Entertainment, Magnetic Press, Massive Publishing, Oni-Lion Forge Publishing Group, Panini UK, Punk Bot Comic Books/Alien Books, The Penn State University/Graphic Mundi, Titan Publishing, Vault Comics, and Dark Horse have submitted a document featuring the “Disclosable Economic Interest in Case.”

What each publisher has in value is listed out. The grand total is over $1.241 million worth of inventory with the most from Titan Publishing with $413,898.17 and least is Heavy Metal Entertainment’s $363.37.

Also, a document that features agreed upon “facts and authenticity of exhibits” between JPMorgan Chase Bank and the Consignment Group has also been released.

It has information like agreements between Diamond and the Publishers and more interesting bits.

Here’s some of the highlights:

  1. “the Consignors and not the Debtors were to pay all personal property taxes on the consigned stock that the Consignors delivered to the Debtors; and that the Debtors sent to the Consignors, on several different occasions, correspondence indicating that the Consignors were responsible for paying personal property taxes to the State of Mississippi and/or DeSoto County, Mississippi, because the Consignors owned the stock delivered to the Debtors.”
  2. “JPM stipulates and agrees that it was aware of the fact that the Diamond Comic Distributors, Inc., debtor (“Distributor”) dealt in consigned goods; and that it had actual knowledge of the Distributor’s participation in consignment transactions during the period from its initial advance of funds to the Debtors through the present.”
  3. The loan documents between JPMorgan and Diamond are all authentic.

The first two points might be important in that the first one indicates it was the publishers who paid taxes on the product, not Diamond, strengthening proof of their ownership. The second point is important in that it shows JPMorgan was aware that Diamond sold consigned goods when it made a loan, a point of contention at various stages.

Publishers Respond to Diamond’s Motion to Move its Consignment Hearing to the middle of SDCC

A group of 13 publishers have filed a response to Diamond‘s attempt to move the hearing regarding its consignment plan. While it was originally scheduled for July 21, Diamond wanted to move it to July 24 or 25. Image Comics weirdly supported the move, even though in their support Image brings up San Diego Comic-Con during that week. The new proposed dates would be smack dab in the middle of SDCC.

On June 25, 2025, Diamond Comic Distributors submitted a motion that would allow them to sell, liquidate, dispose of, inventory it currently still has. The 13 publishers have also filed an objection to Diamond’s motion.

The group of publishers have filed a response that they don’t disagree with the move but ask for it to happen some time after San Diego Comic-Con, so after July 27.

They also are asking for that hearing to be an initial, non-evidentiary hearing, instead of deciding if Diamond’s original motion is approved.

13 Publishers Submit a Joint Motion Objecting Diamond’s Consignment Motion

It’s a massive team-up of publishers who have filed a joint motion objecting to Diamond Comic Distributor‘s motion that would allow them to sell, liquidate, dispose of, inventory it currently still hasMany publishers have been vocal about the motion and many have responded to our inquiries with “no comment” because it’s an ongoing legal matter. So far, TwoMorrows Publishing, Magma Comix, and Graphitti DesignsAbstract StudioNBM, William M. Gaines, Agent, Inc., and Humanoids have each filed objections to the motion.

Aspen Comics, Black Mask Studios, DSTLRY Media, Dynamic Forces, aka Dynamite Entertainment, Heavy Metal International, Magnetic Press, Massive Publishing, Oni-Lion Forge Publishing Group aka Oni Press, Panini UK Ltd., Punk Bot Comic Books, aka Alien Books, The Penn State University aka Graphic Mundi, Titan Publishing Group, and Vault Storyworks, aka Vault Comics formerly known as Creative Mind Energy have formed like Voltron to form a new team called the “consignment group” entering the legal fight.

The 63 page document starts with what we’d expect stating the publishers own the merchandise, aka consigned goods, and not the property of Diamond Comic Distributors. It then dives into Diamond’s claim that the publishers needed to file a UCC-1 financing statement which would have protected them against this situation. The legal argument says that may not needed as this was a “true consignment” established by the various contracts signed and state law.

This filing is similar to Humanoids’ stating that contested matter needs to be handled by Rule 7001(2) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and requires an adversary proceeding and emphasizes again that the publishers own the goods, not Diamond. It also states that it was Diamond’s intention to sell the goods this way and that they should have paid the publishers as per the terms of their agreements.

Like Humanoids’ objection, there’s a focus on Bankruptcy Rule 7001(2) requires that says an adversary proceeding has to happen to determine the “validity, priority, or extent of [an] interest in property.” In short, it hasn’t been determined that the consignment product is property of Diamond and that needs to happen before they can sell anything.

Part of Diamond’s initial motion is that no publishers filed a UCC-1 financing statement which would have protected them. But, did they even need to file it? The publisher’s motion calls them “true consignments,” and don’t meet the definition of UCC Section 9.

(A) the merchant:
(i) deals in goods of that kind under a name other than the name of the
person making the delivery;
(ii) is not an auctioneer; and
(iii) is not generally known by its creditors to be substantially engaged
in selling the goods of others.
(B) with respect to each delivery, the aggregate value of the goods is $1,000 or
more at the time of delivery;
(C) the goods are not consumer goods immediately before delivery; and
(D) the transaction does not create a security interest that secures an obligation.

Back to that non-payment. Goods were shipped after Diamond’s January 14 Chapter 11 filing, and the publishers should be paid for them and administrative expense claims such as attorney fees and late penalties.

The rest of the filing includes purchase order agreements, distribution agreements, details of those agreements like discount percentages, and more.

Publishers Respond to Diamond’s Plan to Liquidate Stock

Diamond Comic Distributors

On June 25, 2025, Diamond Comic Distributors submitted a motion for the “sale or other disposition of consigned inventory.”

After Diamond’s sale of the majority of its assets to Universal Distribution and Ad Populum/Sparkle Pop, (old) Diamond still has a “significant inventory” that was sent on a consignment basis. I think we all assumed all inventory was moved to the two new owners, but that doesn’t seem to be the case. They had an option and that specific part of the purchase was left as to be determined. Instead, it’s sitting in (old) Diamond’s warehouse in Mississippi.

(Old) Diamond is claiming the consignors (the sellers) haven’t followed the legal steps to establish a superior claim to their inventory. In short, the publishers (owners of the product) haven’t done what’s require by law to protect their ownership rights. So now, (old) Diamond has to do something with all of that inventory.

So, (old) Diamond submitted a motion to approve their plan to market, sell, or dispose of the inventory to “minimize costs and maximize recoveries” and generate the “best result for the estates.” It is assumed that money raised from the sale would go towards paying off money owed to JPMorgan Chase Bank which has provided loans to the company throughout the Chapter 11 process. So, instead of money going towards publishers, it’d likely go towards a bank.

As you can imagine, publishers are pissed and frustrated by the lack of communication.

There’s a lot of questions out there like how much stock is being held by (old) Diamond and exactly what stock?

There are 128 publishers listed in the motion and we reached out to a large portion of them to get their responses and a better idea of what’s going on.

As you can imagine, the responses back were mostly filled with anger and frustration. While the majority didn’t respond and many responded with “no comment” due to it being legal matters, we did get some details, a lot on background, but it all help to paint a bigger picture.

This is a brazen and sleazy attempt to pilfer millions of dollars worth of books, many from small, independent publishers for whom this would be a catastrophic economic hardship. We intend to fight this wanton act of piracy with all legal means at our disposal.

-Gary Groth, the founder and publisher of Fantagraphics

I’m trying to make sense of what doesn’t make sense. As an independent creator and publisher, I feel betrayed. Our only crime is to have been loyal. To have trusted the process. Including Chapter 11. But seeing that, not only we haven’t received any payment while our books have been sold, for weeks but now Diamond plans to seize our inventory (our sole possession, basically our lifeline) and selling it for its own profit to absolve its management and pay their bank back on a technicality, is morally and economically unacceptable. It’s fraud in plain sight. We’re part of a group of 128 publishers that are victim of a situation that Diamond created and that they’re trying to solve on our backs. I can’t begin to tell you how frustrating and unfair it is.

I’ve been in publishing for 27 years. On two continents. I’ve never seen this.

I named my company FairSquare Graphics. I believe in best practices. And we’ve been fighting the good fight. Being fair to creators, my peers. Fair to the fans and retailers. All that on a tight budget with all the challenges of not having any seed money or investors. Yet, we published 46 titles in the past 5 years.

I’m an immigrant and a minority. We are a family business and we work more than everybody else. We have that mentality.

I’ve been naturalized American this past April. I swore to protect the rule of law. But where is it for me now? I feel I’ve been caught in a web of deceit. And, believe me, I’m not done fighting. FairSquare Graphics will survive this situation. Wounded. Not dead.

-Fabrice Sapolsky, Publisher FairSquare Graphics

I went into 2025 anticipating a major shake up with Diamond and preparing for the worst. The level of chaos that ensued exceeded my wildest expectations. But it was the lack of communication that was the most disappointing. Even the reps I could speak to were left in the dark up until the day they were no longer employed. There hasn’t been much for us to do but watch as things disintegrated around us.

-Tyler Chin-Tanner, Founder/Publisher A Wave Blue World

Michael Calero, the CEO/Publisher of Massive Publishing gave us not just a comment but also a look into what’s owed:

Thank you for your reporting on this matter. This is one of those cases where a bad situation somehow manages to get significantly worse due to the laws protecting a company that many would say has worked against the interest of its own creditors (Publishers) through the dishonest actions of feckless leadership. Diamond should never have been allowed to enter Chapter 11 bankruptcy, and I think if creditors would have been given the opportunity to provide the court with evidence of the manipulation of inventory and payments prior to the filing, they wouldn’t have approved it. This allowed them to accumulate even more debt, that we as consignment vendors are now being put on the hook for. Massive was one of the first companies to end our exclusive partnership over the original debt and as the sale of the company went forward, we asked for clarity on what would happen with our consignment inventory. Eventually we requested a No Cost Return (NCR) for many of our products. These requests were never properly addressed and new Diamond ownership misled us of what the status of our inventory was as recently as June 3rd. 

We have over 65,000 units of product at the Diamond warehouse which has not been paid for in any way. Consignment products which at the lowest end of our pricing ($4.99) would be worth over $325,000. 

Luckily, we did move some of our trade paperback inventory to Lunar earlier this year but that only accounted for a small portion of the inventory we had trusted to Diamond. Diamond’s contract language does not provide them with the rights to sell this product without compensating us directly, but apparently that is what they are trying to use legal loopholes to supersede. 

In short, I view this as theft. Plain and simple. Diamond is breaking its contractual agreement with us, attempting to sell the product we paid to produce, with no guarantee that we will see a single cent of the proceeds and they are using U.S. Bankruptcy court as their accomplice.

Numerous publishers described a lack of communication or confusing responses from Diamond directly. Overall, there seems to be a confusion as to what (old) Diamond still has versus what (new) Diamond has when it comes to stock and who is responsible for what. Some responses seemed to conflate this motion with Ad Populum’s lack of payments to publishers. Even those at Diamond that remain seem confused as to what’s going on.

One publisher recounted their representative told them to keep sending inventory and keep soliciting product even though the publisher stopped doing both in January. They did ask to send product in May for orders made by retailers and they expect they probably won’t be paid for that. Some publishers have asked for stock to be returned and been successful while others get no response.

Overall, the impact to publishers seems to vary. While some have said it wouldn’t impact them much, there’s others that it sounds like it’d put them on life support or even force them to close. Dynamic Forces moved to expedite their motion to get paid by (old) Diamond and state they’re now owed over $1 million and if they’re not paid, they wouldn’t be able to make their payroll.

Eight retailers opened their books to us with roughly $2.5 million in retail value and about $1 million owed to them currently tied up in this mess. It’s unknown what (old) Diamond has and what (new) Diamond has but the general feedback is they have yet to be paid for any of that either way. With 128 publishers listed in Diamond’s motion, that’s potentially well over $15 million owed to publishers.

There’s still time for publishers to speak up on this. A hearing is set before Honorable Judge Rice on July 21, 2025 at 10:00 am in Courtroom 9-D at the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland, 101 W. Lombard St., Baltimore, MD 21201.

Objections to the Motion must be in writing and filed with the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court, 101 West Lombard Street, Suite 8530, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, on or before July 16, 2025; and be served so as to be received on or before the Objection Deadline by the undersigned counsel for the Debtors.

Chris Mancini’s White Cat Entertainment Joins Massive Indies

Massive Publishing

Chris Mancini’s White Cat Entertainment and Massive Publishing have officially announced a publishing deal for distribution in comic book shops as part of Massive Indies. Mancini let the cat out the bag when announcing White Cat’s San Diego Comic-Con plans. The agreement includes Mancini’s current and future graphic novels. Product is now available for retailers!

The timing also coincides with the leadup Comic-Con event in San Diego, where not only will Mancini and artist Fernando Pinto be signing copies of his books (Small Press Booth O-10) but Massive will be on-site as well, doing a “Massive Indies” activation.

Mancini’s current graphic novels are Long Ago & Far Away, Long Ago and Far Away 2, and Rise of the Kung Fu Dragon Master. At San Diego Comic-Con next month he will be debuting his new book, Alpha Cat, with artist Fernando Pinto.

« Older Entries