Category Archives: Diamond Chapter 11

Diamond Trustee Morgan W. Fisher Motions to Limit Future Notices

A compromise between “old” Diamond and its trustee Moran W. Fisher and 15 publishers wasn’t the only bit of news today when it comes to Diamond’s chapter 7 process. Fisher also submitted an order limiting future notices in the case.

The order is interesting as it lays out a lot of information in the case that reminds us of the scope of the situation.

  • Diamond’s credit matrix initially consisted of almost 1,300 parties and when subscription comic book customers was added it was over 1,500.
  • 75 claims were filed for the Chapter 7 with the highest amount being Dynamic forces with $29,514,087.40 to $182 from Irish Holdings.
  • Omni Agent Solutions logged 742 claims in the main case and 71 claims concerning Diamond Select Toys
  • There were 759 unique claimants, 28 were governmental agencies.

The motion raises the difficulty and cost in notifying everyone every update about the case and there’s numerous other ways to get notifications like a Notice of Appearance and Request for Notices.

Fisher is motioning to limit notices to:

  • Counsel for the Debtor;
  • The Trustee and his counsel;
  • Secured Creditors;
  • The Debtor’s 20 largest unsecured creditors, based on filed claims;
  • The Office of the United States Trustee;
  • The Internal Revenue Service, and the Comptroller of the State of Maryland;
  • Persons who have appeared or filed a notice of appearance and request for service in the case (including persons served via CM/ECF);
  • Parties who are directly affected by a particular motion, paper or pleading.

The 20 largest creditors are:

  • Dynamic Forces, Inc.: $29,514,087.40
  • Alliance Entertainment, LLC: $10,008,534.05
  • Bandai Limited: $9,245,465.10
  • Penguin Random House LLC: $8,941,467.05
  • Passage Trading: $6,297,244.00
  • Oni-Lion Forge Publishing Group: $5,646,907.40
  • Udon Entertainment Inc.: $4,327,716.06
  • Valiant Entertainment LLC: $4,070,588.30
  • Disney Consumer Products, Inc.: $3,638,592.00
  • Creative Grand Industrial HK Limited: $2,960,931.87
  • Zenescope Entertainment, Inc.: $2,360,907.16
  • Fantagraphics Books Inc.: $2,279,330.68
  • MegaHouse Corporation: $2,150,730.00
  • Magnetic Press LLC: $1,957,576.53
  • TMP International, LLC: $1,774,558.48
  • Aftershock Comics, LLC: $1,767,573.53
  • ARA, Inc.: $1,229,027.36
  • Funko, LLC: $1,206,854.62
  • Action Figure Authority Inc.: $1,200,000.00
  • Hasbro, Inc.: $1,185,638.23

They’re also looking for permission to pay for the notifications without having to ask permission for each time they need to do so.

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

Diamond’s Trustee Morgan W. Fisher and some Publishers Reach a Settlement over Consigned Goods

It’s a hell of a new comic book day as court documents have been released as to a settlement between Diamond‘s trustee Morgan W. Fisher and a group of publishers concerning consigned goods being held by Diamond and Sparkle Pop.

To catch folks up, when Diamond declared bankruptcy, it held a large quantity of product in its warehouse that was on consignment. After some time, Diamond claimed it had a right to sell the consigned goods to help pay down its debt and that nothing would go to the publishers. The publishers claimed it was their property and that when Diamond declared bankruptcy it triggered a whole bunch of different things that would allow them to get their product back. This has gone on for about a year and a half that resulted in all sorts of off-shoot lawsuits and a lot of behind-the-scenes negotiations.

To make things even more complicated, some items were sold when they weren’t supposed to. Sparkle Pop, the company that took over “old” Diamond, deposited $840,151.00 into an account of which $669,410.00 represents sales of goods from the Consignment Group. In addition, Sparkle Pop has $417,496.00 for sales after May 15 2025 through February 13, 2026 of which $273,503.00 represents sales of the Consignment Group’s goods. Of that initial amount of the $669,410, $50,000 will go to the publishers with $619,410 going to the trustee but what is in escrow and owed to the other publishers not part of this group needs to be figured out and settled. The $273,503 will go entirely to the trustee. If it’s found Sparkle Pop sold even more than what’s known, the publishers need to pursue that at their own cost and 5% of any recovery from that would go to the Diamond trustee after expenses for the legal proceeding are handled.

Now, we have a resolution, a “compromise,” and from the cursory read, it seems like it’s pretty much what we expected the result to be.

The compromise in short is that a certain group of publishers will get some money for the product of theirs sold and will be able to get the product back but they’ll need to pay for packing and shipping. The compromise is similar to a deal cut between Image and Diamond (the money is the difference between the two).

What’s also big is that it terminates any distribution agreement that currently exists for these publishers with “old” Diamond. This in particular stands out:

The Trustee agrees and acknowledges that the Consignment Group Members were the owners of their respective Consignment Inventory at all times prior and subsequent to the Petition Date, and the TSA did not permit or authorize Sparkle Pop to sell, distribute or dispose of Consignment Inventory on behalf of either the Consignment Group members or the Debtors other than in accordance with the Distribution Agreements and at the Debtor’s sole and express direction.

Publishers that are part of the compromise:

Ablaze
American Mythology
Avatar Press
Battle Quest Comics
Action Lab

Drawn & Quarterly
Fantagraphics
Green Ronin Publishing
Hermes Press
Living the Line

Paizo
UDON Entertainment
Zenescope
BOOM! Studios
Dynamite Forces/Dynamite

There are some publishers who are noticeably missing from this list and have been participating in court proceedings up to this point.

The bullet points of key parts of the deal and we’ve put in bold the major ones:

  • The Court Registry Escrow not allocable to the Otherwise Represented Consignors shall be released to the Parties and distributed as follows: (a) Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) to the Consignment Group Members that are also members of the Ad Hoc Committee (to be allocated as it/they deem appropriate); and (b) the remainder to the Trustee (thus, the net amount to be paid to the Estates is $619,410.00).
  • The Settling Parties shall jointly move the Bankruptcy Court for an order directing that Sparkle Pop release the aggregate amount allocable to each Consignment Group Member from the SP Escrow, as set forth on Schedule 3 to the Trustee.
  • If not already rejected, all Distribution Agreements of the Consignment Group Members shall be deemed rejected as of the Effective Date of the Settlement and terminated in their entirety.
  • The Consignment Group Members will have the authority and are required to retrieve any and all of their inventory from the Warehouse, bearing their own costs of picking and packing such inventory.
  • Sparkle Pop is entitled to pick and pack the inventory identified by the Consignment Group Members, at rates comparable to what the Consignment Group Members can obtain from other third parties to complete the work. If Sparkle Pop declines to do the pick and pack work at comparable rates, the Consignment Group Members are authorized to access their Consignment Inventory and remove it from the Warehouse under the timelines set forth in the Settlement.
  • The Trustee, on behalf of himself the Debtors, releases and discharges the Consignment Group Members from any and all claims, causes of actions, obligations, and damages including, but not limited to, preference claims. Similar releases from the Consignment Group Members flow to the Trustee and Estates, subject to certain claims as described herein and in the Settlement. In other words, the releases are essentially mutual.
  • The Consignment Group Members are reserving all rights with regard to any additional claims against Sparkle Pop. In the event any Consignment Group Member recovers additional funds from Sparkle Pop on account of unauthorized sales of or shortages in the Consigned Inventory in excess of the Court Registry Escrow and SP Escrow, such Consignment Group Member shall pay five percent (5%) of any such recovery to the Estates, net of any legal fees and expenses required to collect such amounts.
  • In the event Sparkle Pop obtains a judgment against any Consignment Group Member for rent, storage, or similar charges with respect to such Consignment Group Member’s Consigned Inventory stored at the Warehouse, that Consignment Group Member shall have an Administrative Claim against the Estates in an amount equal to 25% of such claim.
  • In the event Sparkle Pop or the Consignment Group Members obtain a finding that any consignment inventory delivered by any Consignment Group Member was unreported as being sold by the Debtor prior to the Settlement, but was in fact sold by or at the Debtor’s direction, and paid to or for the benefit of Debtor, the respective Consignment Group Member(s) that delivered any such Missing Inventory shall be entitled to a chapter 7 administrative claim against the Debtors that is subordinate to certain other expenses and claims including any finally-allowed post-conversion administrative claims of Sparkle Pop, JP Morgan Chase and/or the Trustee’s professionals.
  • Within sixty (60) days after the Effective Date, the Trustee will file a notice of abandonment pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 554 as to the Consigned Inventory.
  • Within ten (10) days after the Effective Date, the Trustee shall assign to the Consignment Group all of his rights, title, and interest, without representation or warranty of any kind, in and to the CG Adversary Proceedings as plaintiff therein.
  • Within ten (10) days after the Effective Date, (i) the Trustee will file a notice of dismissal of the Denial Order Appeal (if not already resolved), and (ii) the Members of the Consignment Group, as applicable, will file a notice of dismissal of the CG Adversary Counterclaims.

But… there’s more!

The Consignment Group Members are entitled to file a “substantial contribution claim” for their legal fees and costs having to do with this fight.

Other consignors who are not part of this settlement as settling parties have to reach a resolution with the Consignment Group Members and its counsel on a fee and expense sharing arrangement. But, the Trustee and other consignors who are not part of this agreement could reach their own settlement.

What’s big, and why we thought there would be a settlement, it ends Sparkle Pop charging “old” Diamond and its trustee in what’s described as a “burdensome administrative cost.”

The Parties believes the Settlement is in the best interest of the Estates. It eliminates a burdensome administrative cost that is being asserted by Sparkle Pop with regard to the continued storage of the Consignment Inventory at the Warehouse; it relieves the Trustee from any further involvement in the CG Adversary Proceedings of the Settling Parties and the Appeal; it provides a substantial cash infusion to the Debtors’ Estate; and it protects the Consignment Group Members from further erosion of value of their Consignment Inventory as well as prevents the flooding of the market with respect to unauthorized sales of their inventory.

You can read all of the documents below and we’ll have more as this major decision unfolds:

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

Sparkle Pop’s Motion for Relief is Denied Without Prejudice

Red stamp with the word 'DENIED' prominently displayed.

While it feels like the comic industry has moved on from Diamond’s chapter 7 process, the court cases are very much still active with numerous major decisions still to be made. In April, Sparkle Pop filed a motionfor relief from the automatic stay to exercise its rights under applicable state law with respect to the goods remaining in a distribution facility owned and operated by Sparkle Pop.” One of the ongoing fights in Diamond‘s bankruptcy concerns consigned goods provided by publishers and still “held” by Diamond. Publishers of course want their inventory back while Diamond claims it has a right to it so it can sell the product and pay back creditors. The inventory is currently being stored in a facility run by Sparkle Pop, one of the winners of the bidding for Diamond’s assets during the bankruptcy.

In the filing, Sparkle Pop stated there are “8,250,936 units of these goods being stored at the Mississippi Facility.”

Sparkle Pop also stated it is owed $641,430 as of April 2026 and has not received its rent payments from (old) Diamond since November 2025. Rent is $125,000 a month. Sparkle Pop previously filed an administrative claim for $580,000 in March.

In short, Sparkle Pop was arguing it is suffering damages from (old) Diamond’s consigned goods being stored in their facility.

Sparkle Pop was looking to be reimbursed for all of its fees and costs related to the consigned goods and it threatened to exercise its “rights and remedies under Mississippi law to, among other things, assert a warehouseman’s lien on the consigned goods and/or take the necessary steps, under applicable law (or with the consent of the parties), to arrange for these goods to be removed from the Mississippi Facility.”

Today, the court has come down with its decision:

Evidentiary Hearing Held: re: 1265 Relief from Stay and Notice of Motion IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILING AFTER 60 DAYS. Order to be prepared by Movant.(related document(s) 1265 Relief from Stay and Notice of Motion, 1277 Objection, 1280 Objection) (Scott, Cherita)

Since it was “denied without prejudice,” Sparkle Pop can refile its motion again with adjustments. It’s possible there was an error in the original filing or new information that has dropped that impacts the original.

We’ll have more information as this court case continues and update this one if more details emerge as to the reason the motion was denied.

Expeditors International of Washington gets its Administrative Expenses Approved in Diamond’s Chapter 7 Case

It’s been rather quiet when it comes to Diamond‘s chapter 7 process. Our alerts have been filled up with notices of returned mail… and not much else. But, today saw a little bit of news with one order approved by the court.

Expeditors International of Washington has had its administrative expense claim approved. There was no objections to the motion according to the approval. Expeditors International of Washington is a logistics company.

The company will receive their claim amount of $266,855.15.

Loading Viewer…

Discovery Dates in Sparkle Pop’s Adversary Proceeding Against Alliance Entertainment Set

In June 2025, Sparkle Pop began a proceeding against Alliance Entertainment for “disregard of binding non-disclosure and non-solicitation obligations and its theft of valuable of trade secrets.” For those who might not remember, Alliance Entertainment originally won the bid for Diamond’s assets, then Diamond went with Universal Distribution and Ad Populum (Sparkle Pop’s parent company), then back to Alliance. Then Alliance ended their bid claiming fraud by Diamond and those involved. Eventually Universal Distribution and Ad Populum/Sparkle Pop won the bid.

Sparkle Pop accuses Alliance for abusing the bankruptcy process and gaining inside access to Diamond’s “employees, trade secrets, and proprietary information, all while delaying the sale of assets to legitimate purchasers.” Alliance recently hired seven Diamond employees which Sparkle Pop calls “poaching” and claiming it has “hobbled” its business. It further claims Alliance has “exploited its inside knowledge of Diamond Comic’s confidential information to usurp key distribution relationships with vendors and customers, further undermining the business.”

Alliance has signed a non-disclosure and non-solicitation agreement that bars the accused conduct according to the motion.

There’s lots of details about violations of NDAs, employee’s confidentially obligations, and that Alliance is attempting to poach Amazon away from Diamond. Former Diamond employees named include Joe Lunday who called Amazon on his last day to tell them of his switching of employers. Diamond Comic’s law firm Saul Ewing has sent a cease-and-desist letter to Alliance on behalf of Diamond.

The motion claims the following counts:

  1. Violation of the DTSA
  2. Violation of the Maryland Uniform Trade Secrets Act
  3. Tortious Interference with Employment Contracts
  4. Tortious Interference with the APA and TSA
  5. Injunctive Relief

Sparkle Pop is seeking damages to be proved during trial, a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction and permanent injunction that would prevent further soliciting Diamond employees or any business relationship with Amazon, and using any Diamond trade secrets.

Since June, things have gone a bit wonky. In December of 2025, the parties agreed to some deadlines but Diamond also began to convert from Chapter 11 to Chapter 7 and there was a stay placed on the proceedings until February 2026.

The parties have filed a motion amending the scheduling order and clarify the applicable deadlines now that the stay has been lifted.

Per the latest filing:

  1. Fact discovery will continue through November 30, 2026. The Parties may take fact depositions at any time prior to the expiration of the fact discovery deadline.
  2. The parties will submit a confidentiality order and protocol for the exchange of electronically stored information to the Court for approval on or before May 27, 2026.
  3. Any motion to amend pleadings must be electronically filed no later than August 14, 2026.
  4. All other terms of the Joint Report that will binding upon the partes.

Discovery is a key part of trials where the parties get information from each other regarding the case. So, think documents, email and text conversations, stuff like that. It can involve millions of documents that have to be gone through and can be used as evidence in the case.

So, with discovery continuing through November 30, expect this case to go into 2027. You can check out the filed motion below:

Loading Viewer…

Court Approves the Employment of Multiple People in Diamond’s Chapter 7 Process

Diamond Trustee Morgan F. Fisher has been trying to put together a team to help navigate Diamond’s chapter 7 process as well as for litigation that has spun out of it.

Today, the court granted multiple applications to employ and retain individuals to help with the process.

That included:

  • David J. Shuster, Esquire and Kramon & Graham, P.A. as Special Litigation Counsel that will focus on a lawsuit involving Alliance Entertainment (Doc 1283
  • Richard Marc Goldberg and Shapiro Sher Guinot & Sandler as Lead General Bankruptcy Counsel (doc 1282
  • Robert Patrick and Sc&H Group, Inc. as Financial Advisor And Litigation Support Consultant

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

Court Approves Diamond’s Trustee Morgan W. Fisher’s Motion to Borrow from JPMorgan Chase Bank

The court has approved Diamond Trustee Morgan W. Fisher‘s motion to borrow money from JPMorgan Chase Bank. Fisher’s plan involves litigation in hopes that by winning, Diamond would gain enough money to help pay down its loans and obligations. The court modified Fisher’s request slightly, and as can be seen in the document, Fisher’s plan would mostly pay back the bank JPMorgan Chase and consultants hired during Diamond’s chapter 7 process while leaving creditors with little after.

Fishers plan includes:

  • Litigation involving Alliance Entertainment
  • Litigation involving Consigned Goods
  • Avoidance Litigation

You can get a deeper dive into all of that here.

The decision is a blow to publishers as it increases the amount the Trustee and Diamond owes to JPMorgan Chase Bank and signals litigation will continue, dragging out this process further.

You can read the full motion below.

Loading Viewer…

The Ad Hoc Committee Officially Gets its Time Extension while Creditor Expeditors International of Washington are Given Instruction in Today’s Diamond Chapter 7 Update

Two updates have come in today (so far) for Diamond’s Chapter 7 process…

The first, and easiest, is the Ad Hoc Committee of Consignors‘ request to extend the time they could respond to recent motions by Diamond’s Trustee has been approved. The Ad Hoc Committee was able to respond on or before April 24 at 12:00pm ET…

And they did!

You can read their full response here.

The second update is an intriguing one and concerns money owed. Creditor Expeditors International of Washington is seeking $266,855.15 in payment. The court has instructed them to get the right filing in to make that happen looking for a “memorandum that explains the legal and factual justification for such a request.”

Court Instruction – Expeditors apparently seeks both (i) allowance of a Chapter 11 administrative expense claim in the amount of $266,855.15, and (ii) IMMEDIATE PAYMENT OF THAT CLAIM BY THE CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE. If Expeditors actually seeks immediate payment, it must file by May 15, 2026 a supplemental memorandum that explains the legal and factual justification for such a request under the circumstances of this case; otherwise, the immediate payment request will be denied. (related document(s)[1229] Application for Administrative Expenses filed by Creditor Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.). Responses due by 5/15/2026. (McKenna, Shannon)

Creditor Expeditors International of Washington is a logistics company. In February 2026, their motion for administrative expense was denied by the court. You can see that document below. They had originally filed for the amount but the Trustee was not yet appointed for the case to be served with the request. This is more an administrative bump, so we’ll see if there’s an official, updated request and of course, it’s more money that’s being asked of Diamond.

Loading Viewer…

Diamond Trustee Morgan Fisher and the Ad Hoc Committee Release their Exhibit and Witness Lists Ahead of April 27 Hearing

The Ad Hoc Committee of Consignors and Diamond Trustee Morgan Fisher have released their exhibit and witness lists ahead of the hearing scheduled for April 27. The hearing will focus on recent motion by the Trustee for loans from JPMorgan Chase Bank to continue litigation related to Diamond’s bankruptcy.

Fisher’s filing is pretty focused featuring just the order to authorize the borrowing of money from JPMorgan Chase and the use of cash collateral as well as an asset purchase agreement between Diamond and Alliance Entertainment from April 2025. The witness list includes three individuals Morgan Fisher, David Shuster, and Robert L. Patrick.

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

The Ad Hoc Committee of Consignors exhibit list teases a focus on Diamond’s finances and they may call Morgan Fisher, the Trustee handling Diamond’s chapter 7 case. Included is Sparkle Pop’s offer to purchase the consigned stock from Diamond for $1 million and a transcript of Robert Gorin (which we’ll be diving into further).

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

The Ad Hoc Committee of Consignors Objects to Diamond’s Trustee’s Motion to Borrowing from JPMorgan Chase Bank

As expected, the Ad Hoc Committee of Consignors has submitted a motion objecting to Diamond’s Trustee Morgan W. Fisher‘s motion asking to borrow a limited amount of money from JPMorgan Chase Bank and to use cash collateral.

In their motion, the Ad Hoc Committee states their reasons line up with the objections submitted by Alliance Entertainment earlier int he week.

The Ad Hoc Committee goes further stating that Fisher had the opportunity in December 2025 to reject the contracts Diamond could no longer afford and resolve outstanding litigation. Instead, Fisher has chosen to “double down” and “seek costly financing to employ a team of professionals to pursue litigation claims.”

They point out that the financing does nothing beyond adding additional administrative burden on Diamond in the hope of recovering consigned stock that would only benefit JPMorgan Chase Bank.

The Ad Hoc Committee goes further with a pretty blunt point:

With no employees, lapsed insurance policy with no insurance on the stock, a growing rent obligation to its purchaser of non-consignment stock, and no way to distribute the consigned stock, the Debtor has proposed no viable mechanism by which it could distribute stock at a cost that permits it to cover the cost of the proposed financing and additional rent and insurance charges in so doing. In other words, the Debtor has no hope of distributing any stock; it cannot afford to store and insure the stock; and yet it wants to borrow more money from its lender so that the lender can get paid 100% of whatever the Debtor recoups from a liquidation that would decimate the value of the property.

They go on further focusing on the consigned goods which are still in question highlighting in the distribution deal, Diamond is entitled to 10% of the MSRP of the sale of consigned stock but are now trying to get 100% of the proceeds to pay their lender.

But going back to the Trustee’s plan…

Fisher laid out three avenues to gain revenue if the loan from JPMorgan is approved, with litigation being a few of them. Though it’s the plan, Fisher doesn’t go into the likelihood that any of the litigation succeeds. There could be more debt incurred through this plan with no gain from it at all. There’s also no timeline which means no projected further cost to Diamond as well as if there is success, the cost of distributing the consigned goods.

As is, Sparkle Pop offered $1 million to purchase the consigned stock but four months have passed and the cost to rent the warehouse by Diamond is currently $576,000 with $144,000 per month. The amount they’d have to pay in storage outweighs the possible benefit of selling it. With warehouse rent owed on the stock, the lack of insurance, and more, the Ad Hoc Committee emphasizes that Diamond is in violation of its agreements to hold onto the stock. They also state they have an administrative claim if Diamond is able to sell the stock.

With all of that, the Ad Hoc Committee argues that borrowing money from JPMorgan to fund litigation isn’t in Diamond’s best interest and is only in the interest of JPMorgan who Diamond owes about $7 million.

You can read the full motion below.

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

« Older Entries