Category Archives: WBD Bid

Los Angeles projected to lose 4,500 local positions and $4.06 billion in business due to Paramount/Warner Bros. Discovery Deal

The Department of Economic Opportunity for Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Film Office has released a report on its projection of the losses for the city if Paramount succeeds in its acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery.

An initial 60 day report stated “a potential loss of 15,567 corporate roles that overlap across both companies, with 6,099
shared, and 2,495 jobs specifically in Los Angeles County.”

The 120-day final report has been released and highlights risks to numerous groups such as “regulators, workers, investors, and state and local governments” if the merger succeeds.

For Los Angeles County specifically, the final report projects:

  • If the merger goes through, about 4,500 film and TV jobs in Los Angeles County could be lost over the three-year period when the companies combine operations.
  • In total, 10,360 job years could be at risk, including:
    • 2,661 indirect jobs at small businesses that support production — such as prop houses, printers, transportation companies, and other vendors.
    • 3,204 induced jobs that exist because film and TV workers spend money in the local economy — including restaurants, retailers, and service providers.

The economic impact of losing these jobs is significant. At stake:

  • $1.26 billion in wages
  • $2.78 billion in economic value
  • $4.06 billion in total business output
  • $547 million in tax revenue, including $78.6 million in local taxes — most of which (63%) comes from property taxes.

The report raises the concern that job losses would occur through:

  • Slate consolidation (fewer buyers = fewer greenlights) – There would be fewer unscripted/talk shows and related opportunities for Los Angeles-based crews.
  • Talent deals at risk – There’s 895 creators with exclusive deals between the two companies. If there’s less development, work would be lost.
  • Location decisions shifting production away – The new post-merger company would likely shift production away from Los Angeles.
  • Cost of living and Tax Credit Incentives Pressure – LA County and California has a high cost of living and there’s increased competition to court productions through tax credit incentives.

Currently, a dozen attorneys general are fighting the merger between Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery in an antitrust lawsuit along with a lawsuit by the Writers Guild of America. This report is sure to add fuel to the fire and help the fight to try and prevent the deal to go through.

You can read the full report below.

Loading Viewer…

Paramount $1.88 Billion Bond Request Won’t be Decided until Late September

Just a few days ago, Paramount requested 12 states and the Writers Guild of America post a $1.88 billion bond in their antitrust lawsuits. The lawsuits have halted a $110.8 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery by Paramount. A federal law protects mergers and acquisition parties from “potential harm” from halting the deal for litigation.

Paramount is trying to get the states and Writers Guild of America to pay for the timer portion of their proposed deal that would increase the cost by about $7 million per day if it doesn’t close before September 30. As of now, that doesn’t look like it’ll happen. Paramount agreed to halt the deal until their lawsuit with a dozen attorneys general is over or June 1, 2027. A trial is set for March 2, 2027 and believed to last 17 days. The delay through the trial, about 169 days, will cost the company about $1.15 billion.

But, a court decision about that bond will cut it close to when that ticking fee begins in the Paramount/WBD deal. Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin has decided that nothing will be decided in Paramount’s move until September 24. That’s just a week before the the fee would begin and the costs begin to increase.

Paramount is seeking a $1.88 Billion Bond from Plaintiffs

Paramount is citing a federal law in asking 12 states and the Writers Guild of America to post a $1.88 billion bond in their antitrust lawsuits. The lawsuits have halted a $110.8 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery by Paramount. A federal law protects mergers and acquisition parties from “potential harm” from halting the deal for litigation.

Paramount is trying to get the states and Writers Guild of America to pay for the timer portion of their proposed deal that would increase the cost by about $7 million per day if it doesn’t close before September 30. As of now, that doesn’t look like it’ll happen as Paramount has agreed to halt the deal until their lawsuit with a dozen attorneys general is over or June 1, 2027.

A trial is set for March 2, 2027 and believed to last 17 days. The delay through the trial, about 169 days, will cost the company $1.15 billion.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta who is leading the case for the states has said it’s a move by Paramount to get the plaintiffs to back down. Paramount CEO David Ellison has threatened to move Paramount out of California if the states don’t negotiate a settlement.

Paramount and Warner Bros. are two sophisticated companies who willfully decided to include a costly ticking fee [to shareholders] as a provision in their merger contract. They knew this merger would undergo regulatory review; they knew it was not a done deal; and they chose to include it anyway.

What’s more, Paramount itself stipulated to the timing it is now protesting — they agreed to the dates and did not request a bond as a condition of agreeing not to close until after the trial, and potentially as late as June 2027. Now, they’re trying to get a do-over.

Bottom line: Paramount went into this process with eyes wide open. They are lying in a bed of their own making, and once again, trying to blackmail us to get us to back down.

-Office of Attorney General Rob Bonta

Hollywood Teamsters Call out Paramount over the Warner Bros. Discovery Acquisition

While the DGA and IATSE unions kiss Paramount‘s ass and call for a settlement between Paramount and a dozen state attorneys general in their antitrust lawsuit, the Teamster Local 399 is taking another route. Paramount is currently attempting to purchase Warner Bros. Discovery for $110 billion.

Lindsay Dougherty has released a statement to Deadline that it’s time to cut the crap.

At every step of the way, Teamsters have asked for data to show how this merger would be good for our industry, our members and domestic production. Touting worker prosperity, without commitments, while simultaneously threatening their livelihood in the press as a bargaining chip begs the question — what is in this deal for American film and television workers?

The Teamsters had previously called on the Department of Justice to block the merger. Trump’s Department of Justice approved the deal. David and Larry Ellison have been accused of supporting and being friends with Trump which resulted in the acquisition to receive little scrutiny and is reported to have ignored government lawyers who were going to recommend a challenge to the deal.

The deal at $110 billion (currently, more on that later) and heavy debt by Ellison will force the company to make cuts quickly and will likely result in massive layoffs. After the purchase of Fox by Disney, the House of Mouse laid off thousands of workers. Paramount will have to do the same, if not worse, if this deal goes through.

Paramount CEO David Ellison has promised theater owners the combined mega-studio would release 30 films a year, and has assured CNN would have editorial independence. They’ve recently said everything is on the table in hopes to settle the lawsuit from the attorneys general. Paramount’s Chief Legal Officer Makan Delrahim has stated they’re willing to work towards a resolution and there have been rumors that includes selling CNN, though having an oversight board has also been floated. Ellison has threatened to pull the company from California if the antitrust lawsuit continues.

With a trial not set for March 2027, Paramount is scrambling to cut a deal beforehand. Each day beyond September 30, the price of the deal increases $7 million a day. With a promise to put the deal on hold until June 2027 or the conclusion of the trial, the $110 billion deal could increase by about $1.3 billion.

That increasing price is only one factor as to why the deal might be in jeopardy. David Ellison’s father Larry Ellison, the founder of Oracle, has backed a large portion of the deal with about 49% of it being financed by foreign entities. Larry’s wealth is tied heavily into Oracle stock which has been volatile due to questions regarding its investment in data center infrastructure and whose fortune now relies heavily on AI succeeding. With the belief of an AI bubble growing, it’s very likely Ellison’s fortune could tumble quickly and soon. The longer the deal drags out, the more the risk increases for Ellison in the bubble popping and the deal collapsing resulting in a $7 billion payout to Warner Bros. Discovery for the deal ending.

Paramount’s CEO David Ellison Threatens to Exit California Unless the State AG Negotiates Regarding the Warner Bros. Deal

Veruca Salt with a David Ellison name tag

Paramount CEO David Ellison is taking another page out of the Veruca Salt playbook of stomping your feet until you get what you want. Ellison has told executives of Paramount that he will begin the process of exiting California on October 1 unless State Attorney General Rob Bonta negotiates a settlement regarding the antitrust suit regarding the takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery.

Bonta is leading a group of 12 state Attorneys General that have formed like Voltron in an antitrust lawsuit against Paramount in its attempted $110 billion (potentially $111 billion) takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery. Paramount had agreed to pause any business with the takeover until the trial ends or June 2027. The trial has been set to begin on March 2.

Paramount also faces a lawsuit from the Writers Guild of America as well as one filed by shareholders.

Bonta has released a statement regarding the threat:

In a span of weeks, Paramount agreed to halt the merger until a court decision or until June 2027, asked for a November trial, and is now back with another attempt to blackmail the state into letting an illegal deal through. Paramount has lost the plot as it continues to lose in court. It didn’t work the first time — on the eve of our July lawsuit — and it won’t work this time.

If Ellison follows through with his threat, the relocation would begin with the company’s headquarters and followed by studio jobs. The rumor or Ellison and Paramount leaving the state have swirled for some time.

Paramount faces an increased cost to its deal if it’s not closed by September and the trial alone adds about $1.3 billion to the $110 billion price tag. If the deal falls apart altogether, there’s a $7 billion termination fee. Warner Bros. Discovery can walk if the deal isn’t closed by June 4.

Paramount has been attempting to wage a PR campaign in its favor with Ellison rallying his allies to write op-eds supporting the merger. But, Paramount seems to be hurting its cause by trying to play public opinion as opposed to making concessions with the Attorneys General that may lessen their opposition.

With each volley, and the further strain on the Ellison fortune, the chances of this deal collapsing seems to increase with each day.

The UK Competition and Markets Authority and Culture Secretary Approves Paramount’s Acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery after Guarantees

A government again has laid down choosing not to protect consumers and workers as the UK culture secretary Lisa Nandy as well as the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority have both cleared the deal for Paramount‘s $110 billion+ takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery.

To secure approval from Nandy, Paramount had to agree to some concessions.

  • Paramount’s Channel 5 will continue to operate as a public service broadcaster until the end of 2034. It will also retain editorial independence and remain separate from other news operations like Paramount’s CBS News and Warner Bros. Discovery’s CNN International.

Paramount has come under scrutiny for its takeover of CBS News removing its editorial independence for a more right-wing bent calling into question is history of quality journalism. Paramount owner David Ellison appointed Bari Weiss as the head of the news service as well as a conservative to act as its ombudsman, an “internal advocate for journalistic integrity and transparency.”

  • Paramount has also agreed that its linear and on-demand services in Britain would retain distinct editorial identities for five years, including its children’s TV content.
  • There’s also a guarantee that the deal would not reduce the number of people commissioning content in Britain, and Channel 5 would continue to back UK-originated content covering drama, factual, and entertainment shows.

The deal still faces multiple lawsuits in the United States including one from a dozen state attorneys general as well as the Writers Guild of America. Another case involves shareholders claiming the Ellisons promised “illegal private benefits” to President Trump in exchange for the government approval.

Paramount has received competition clearances in the United States, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Kuwait, Montenegro, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Ukraine, and by the European Commission, and the COMESA Competition Commission.

It also has received foreign direct investment clearances in Australia, Belgium, Czechia, Germany, France, Italy, New Zealand, Romania, Spain, and Slovenia. The transaction was also unconditionally approved by European Commission under its Foreign Subsidies Regulation regime and by the Austrian Federal Competition Authority under its media merger control regime.

Consumer Lawsuit Challenging Paramount’s takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery is Dismissed

Warner Bros. logo

A challenge to Paramount‘s acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery has been dismissed. The group of consumers failed to establish standing according to U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguin. They are allowed to file a revised complaint.

The consumer lawsuit was filed in April and included five subscribers to pay-tv and streaming services who argued the merger would increase prices and decrease the diversity of viewpoints. The lawsuit also was seeking the divestiture of Skydance’s acquisition of Paramount last year.

The group of consumers challenged the merger but the judge wrote:

Plaintiffs’ standing theory amounts to little more than the assertion that they are consumers who watch television and go to the movies, and therefore a merger between entertainment companies would injure them.

Another issue in the case is that the plaintiffs’ injury was a single, historical price increase by Paramount+ but that injury wasn’t suffered in the same way by all five of the plaintiffs.

Martínez-Olguin is also presiding over two other antitrust cases over the same deal. One is the lawsuit brought by a dozen attorneys general and the other is the case brought by the Writers Guild of America. The attorneys general case has a trial date of March 2027. Another case involves shareholders claiming the Ellisons promised “illegal private benefits” to President Trump in exchange for the government approval.

Date Set for Paramount/Warner Bros. Discovery Trial

Warner Bros. logo

U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguin has set a trial date for March 2, 2027 for the antitrust lawsuit regarding Paramount‘s acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. The trial will conclude by March 19.

On July 13, a dozen attorneys general filed a lawsuit to stop the acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery by Paramount Skydance. The lawsuit raised antitrust concerns and a decrease of competition. On July 20, a temporary restraining order was granted that prevented the deal from “closing” or “consummating” or taking any steps that would integrate or consolidate the operations. That temporary restraining order was extended an additional two weeks and then on July 24 Paramount agreed to halt its acquisition while the court case played out, possibly to June 2027.

The delay is a big one because if the deal isn’t completed by September 30, the price increases 25 cents per share per quarter it’s not approved. That would add $627 million to the cost of the overall deal each quarter, or roughly $7 million per day. That means this will increase the cost roughly $1.3 billion if the trial goes the entire time.

Ethics Complaints Raised over FCC Commissioners Gifts from Paramount

Warner Bros. logo

Paramount Skydance‘s attempt to purchase Warner Bros. Discovery has even more stink surrounding it. Two government watchdog groups have requested for an investigation into ethics violations by Federal Communications Commission members. Members accepted luxury gala tickets while Paramount was working to get government approval for its $111 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery.

The Democracy Defenders Fund and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington have cited an investigation by ProPublica about how CBS or its parent company (which is now Paramount) have given tickets to FCC commissioners to the Kennedy Center honors gala. CBS sponsors the event. That gift acceptance included while the Paramount/Warner Bros. deal was going through the government approval process as well as other major business from Paramount, including multiple mergers.

Commissioner Olivia Trusty‘s financial disclosure lists two tickets to the December 2025 gala worth more than $12,000. Trusty voted to approve Paramount’s merger with Skydance.

FCC Chair Brendan Carr‘s financial statements shows he accepted tickets eight times since 2017 which is over $75,000 in gifts. He sat in a private skybox at December’s gala with Paramount’s CEO David Ellison and other Paramount and CBS executives. Carr voted for the Paramount-Skydance merger.

According to ProPublica, seven of the ten commissioners who have served since 2016 accepted tickets with a value of more than $260,000.

Federal ethics rules ban employees from taking gifts from any entity that does business with, is regulated by, or seeks action from the agency.

The Democracy Defenders Fund says that Carr and Trusty broke the rules on accepting gifts or even criminal laws from accepting illegal gratuities. Carr and Trusty should be required to repay Paramount the “fair market value” for their gifts and their annual disclosures should not be certified until they do so. The organization is also requesting Carr to be disqualified from any decision concerning the Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery merger.

Paramount had announced it was making a hostile takeover bid for Warner Bros. Discovery hours after the gala and Carr endorsed the deal three months later.

The Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery deal is on hold while a court case plays out between the company and a dozen attorneys general. The business deal is also facing other litigation as well as unknown decisions from other governments.

Breaking: Paramount Agrees to Halt its Acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery Until June 2027 or Court Rulings are Decided

Warner Bros. logo

In a legal filing, Paramount and state attorneys general have reached an agreement to delay the acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery to June 2027 or earlier if it makes it way through courts and a ruling is made before. The agreement needs to be approved by Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín, who is overseeing the case.

On July 13, a dozen attorneys general filed a lawsuit to stop the acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery by Paramount Skydance. The lawsuit raised antitrust concerns and a decrease of competition. On July 20, a temporary restraining order was granted that prevented the deal from “closing” or “consummating” or taking any steps that would integrate or consolidate the operations. That temporary restraining order was extended an additional two weeks before today’s deal.

The delay throws the entire deal into chaos as it potentially increases the cost to Paramount. For each quarter the deal doesn’t close beginning in October 2026 the cost increases $650 million. If the decision really stretches out until June 2027, that’d increase the cost nearly $2 billion. Paramount has stated that it might have to rework its financing if the price increases and with the volatility in the Ellison’s net-worth due to Oracle stock prices, the deal’s financial situation became far more complicated.

Paramount described the delay as a “significant win” as it will give the company “a direct path to a trial based on the evidence,” a spokeswoman said. “This is the fastest and clearest way to prove that this transaction is good for competition, good for consumers, and good for creators.”

Below is California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s press release regarding the deal:

California Attorney General Rob Bonta today announced securing an agreement with Warner Bros. and Paramount that would keep the entertainment titans from merging until June 1, 2027, or until after a decision by the court on the states’ claims, whichever comes first. If the court finds in favor of the states, the merger would be blocked pending appeal. Last week, Attorney General Bonta led a coalition of 12 attorneys general in filing a lawsuit challenging the unlawful merger, and this week, he celebrated a critical win when he secured a temporary restraining order pausing the merger. The Warner Bros./ Paramount merger is expected to result in higher prices, lower content quality, and fewer movies and TV shows. The proposed $110 billion merger — the largest in Hollywood history — would combine two of Hollywood’s five major film distributors and two of the five major owners of basic cable channels, extinguishing competition between Paramount and Warner Bros., and inflicting substantial harm on movie theaters, basic cable distributors, and ultimately, audiences nationwide. 

“Our argument against this illegal merger is straightforward: When too few corporations have too much power in markets central to American life, it makes things more expensive, and it makes things worse,” said Attorney General Bonta. “Today’s agreement is great news for audiences, movie theaters, and the many people who write, build, and create the art, news, and entertainment so many of us enjoy. We are eager to continue to make our case in court and celebrate another tremendous win in our effort to ensure this unlawful merger never sees the light of day.”

As part of today’s deal, Warner Bros./Paramount agree not to merge until 5 days after a decision on the merits of the states’ challenge or until June 1, 2027, whichever comes earlier. If the court finds in favor of the states, the merger would be blocked pending appeal. If there is no merits determination by June 1, 2027, the states can file a motion for a preliminary injunction.

For more than a century, Warner Bros. and Paramount have stood astride the film and television industry as independent sources of creativity and competition. The lawsuit alleges that the merger violates Section 7 of the Clayton Act, which holds that mergers that may substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly are illegal. The attorneys general allege that, if Warner Bros. and Paramount are allowed to merge, it would lessen competition in three markets: film distribution, anticipated blockbuster film distribution, and licensing cable TV channels.

And the release from the office of Attorney General Letitia James:

Attorney General Letitia James and a coalition of 11 other attorneys general today secured a months-long halt to Paramount Skydance Corp.’s (Paramount) $110 billion takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (Warner Bros.). On July 13, Attorney General James and the coalition sued Paramount and Warner Bros., alleging that their merger would illegally reduce competition throughout the film and television industries, harming workers, consumers, and businesses. Attorney General James and the coalition today secured a stipulation from Paramount and Warner Bros. that will delay the merger until after a court ruling on the merits of the lawsuit or June 1, 2027, whichever is earlier.

“From the workers and artists who bring stories to life to the families who buy tickets at the box office, Paramount’s illegal takeover of Warner Bros. is a bad deal for all those who count on a competitive entertainment industry,” said Attorney General James. “Halting this merger while our case proceeds is a critical victory in our efforts to uphold the law and protect the film and television industries. I look forward to continuing our case to stop this illegal merger.”

On July 20, Attorney General James and the coalition won a temporary restraining order preventing Paramount and Warner Bros. from carrying out their merger. Under the stipulation announced today, Paramount and Warner Bros. will continue to remain separate companies until five days after the court’s decision on the merits of the case or June 1, 2027, whichever comes earlier.

Joining Attorney General James in this case are the attorneys general of Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, and Washington.

For New York, this matter is being handled by Assistant Attorneys General Pratik Agarwal, Morgan Feder, and Will Margrabe and Attorney General Fellow Jaya Mantovani, all of the Antitrust Bureau, under the supervision of Bureau Chief Elinor Hoffmann and Deputy Bureau Chief Amy McFarlane, and with the assistance of Chief Economist Chitra Marti. The Antitrust Bureau is part of the Division for Economic Justice, which is led by Chief Deputy Attorney General Christopher D’Angelo and overseen by First Deputy Attorney General Jennifer Levy.

« Older Entries