Tag Archives: controversy

DC to Bill: No, Fables isn’t in the Public Domain

Michael Scott

Yesterday was all sorts of crazy as writer Bill Willingham released a statement claiming that he was putting Fables into the public domain. The reason was his preceived mistreatment by the publisher DC Comics.

While many latched on to it as a victory and blow to corporations who mistreat creators, those that know copyright and trademark knew something wasn’t quite right. We mentioned in our original coverage that in the end, what’s in the contract (which hasn’t been released) is what matters. Like Michael Scott declaring bankruptcy, this isn’t how things really work.

Now, DC Comics has released a corporate statement:

The Fables comic books and graphic novels published by DC, and the storylines, characters and elements therein, are owned by DC and protected under the copyright laws of the United States and throughout the world in accordance with applicable law, and are not in the public domain. DC reserves all rights and will take such action as DC deems necessary or appropriate to protect its intellectual property rights.

We’ve only gotten Willingham’s side of the story beyond DC’s corporate statement (which are rare). There’s most likely much more to the story and all of Willingham’s claims and complaints.

In the end, without seeing the contracts and all of the paperwork since, no one will know for sure what the reality of all of this is. So, for those wannabe Spartacus, it’s best to proceed with caution unless you have deep pockets for a potential court fight.

The Kirby Estate releases a statement regarding the Disney+ Stan Lee documentary

Disney+ recently launched a documentary focused on Stan Lee and as expected its contents are rather controversial. While history will debate the absolute truth, and may never really know it, the documentary embellishes history and puts Lee front and center in the creation of everything Marvel. Unsurprisingly, that hasn’t gone over well with quite a few people. Neal Kirby, the son of Jack Kirby put out a lengthy statement regarding the documentary. Now, The Kirby Estate has released an official statement you can read below.

The newest Stan Lee documentary is another example of regurgitating falsehoods and repeating long debunked ideas into the creation of these beloved Marvel characters. Jack and Stan were an amazing team, whose combined talents ushered in an entire universe of superheroes that have inspired generations. The Jack Kirby Estate has and will continue to ensure that comic book and pop culture fans understand the importance of Jack in the creation of the Marvel Universe. This continuation to push a challenged narrative, hurts the legacy of Stan Lee as well, and continues the disregard towards Jack in the creation of these iconic characters. It truly pains the family to once again have to fight the ensure Jack’s legacy and his global contribution to the comics industry. Jack Kirby was more than an artist, he was a visionary and creative force, whose contribution to the creation of many Marvel character goes way beyond putting pencil to paper. Stan Lee will rightfully be remembered as a champion of comic books, creative powerhouse and figurehead of one the world’s most cherished brands. It is now time for the world to discover the other creative forces behind their favorite superheroes. The Jack Kirby Estate invites you to learn more about Jack’s version how how these superheroes were created and his inspiration for doing so. Jack loved his fans and creating for them was not just a job, it was his passion. There are many resources that now add historical facts that are finally changing the one-sided narrative that has been pushed throughout the years. We look forward to one day having a documentary that tells both sides of this amazing story. Until that time, we’ll continue to ensure Jack’s legacy is protected and find solace in knowing that these co-creations continue to inspired and entertain people around the world.

The Kirby Estate

Jack Kirby’s son Neal Kirby responds to the Disney+ Stan Lee documentary

Disney+ recently launched a documentary focused on Stan Lee and as expected its contents are rather controversial. While history will debate the absolute truth, and may never really know it, the documentary embellishes history and puts Lee front and center in the creation of everything Marvel. That hasn’t gone over well with Neal Kirby, the son of Jack Kirby who put out a lengthy statement regarding the documentary.

Check it out the text below and then listen to our Graphic Policy Radio episode featuring Abraham Riesman discussing the Stan Lee biography True Believer: The Rise and Fall of Stan Lee.

The 13th-century Islamic poet/scholar Rumi said, “The Ego is a veil between humans and God.” In the Disney+ documentary bio of Stan Lee, the veil is lifted. Presented in the first person with Lee’s voice providing a running narrative, it is Stan Lee’s greatest tribute to himself. The literary expression of ego is the personal pronoun “I.” Any decent English or Journalism teacher would admonish their students not to overuse it. So, the challenge is extended to anyone who wishes to count the number of “I’s” during the 86-minute running time of Stan Lee.

I (000ps!) understand that, as a “documentary about Stan Lee,” most of the narrative is in his voice, literally and figuratively. It’s not any big secret that there has always been controversy over the parts that were played in the creation and success of Marvel’s characters. Stan Lee had the fortunate circumstance to have access to the corporate megaphone and media, and he used these to create his own mythos as to the creation of the Marvel character pantheon. He made himself the voice of Marvel. So, for several decades he was the “only” man standing, and blessed with a long life, the last man standing (my father died in 1994). It should also be noted and is generally accepted that Stan Lee had a limited knowledge of history, mythology, or science.

On the other hand, my father’s knowledge of these subjects, to which I and many others can personally attest, was extensive. Einstein summed it up better; “More the knowledge, lesser the ego. Lesser the knowledge, more the ego.”

If you were to look at a list and timeline of Marvel’s characters from 1960 through 1966, the period in which the vast majority of Marvel’s major characters were created during Lee’s tenure, you will see Lee’s name as a co-creator on every character, with the exception of the Silver Surfer, solely created by my father. Are we to assume Lee had a hand in creating every Marvel character? Are we to assume that the other co-creator never walked into Lee’s office and said, “Stan, I have a great idea for a character!” According to Lee, it was always his idea. Lee spends a fair amount of time talking about how and why he created the Fantastic Four, with only one fleeting reference to my father. Indeed, most comics historians recognize that my father based the Fantastic Four on a 1957 comic he created for DC, “Challengers of the Unknown,” even naming Ben Grimm (The Thing) after his father Benjamin, and Sue Storm after my older sister Susan.

Though the conflict between Lee and my father concerning creator credit gets glanced over with little mention, there is more attention paid to the strife between Lee and Steve Ditko, with Lee’s voice proclaiming, “It was my idea, therefore I created the character,” Ditko’s rebuttal being that his art and storyline is what brought life to Spiderman. In 1501, the Opera del Duomo commissioned a 26-year-old Michelangelo to sculpt a statue of David for the Cathedral of Florence – their idea, their money. The statue is called Michelangelo’s David – his genius, his vision, his creativity.

I was very fortunate. My father worked at home in his Long Island basement studio we referred to as “The Dungeon,” usually 14 – 16 hours a day, seven days a week. Most of the artists, writers, inkers, etc. worked at home, not in the Marvel offices as depicted in the program. Through middle and high school, I was able to stand at my father’s left shoulder, peer through a cloud of cigar smoke, and witness the Marvel Universe being created. I am by no means a comics historian, but there are few, if any, that have personally seen or experienced what I have, and know the truth with first-hand knowledge.

My father retired from comic books in the early 1980s and of course, passed away in 1994. Lee had over 35 years of uncontested publicity, much naturally, with the backing and blessing of Marvel as he boosted the Marvel brand as a side effect of boosting himself. The decades of Lee’s self-promotion culminated with his cameo appearances in over 35 Marvel films starting with “X-Men” in 2000, thus cementing his status as the creator of all things Marvel to an otherwise unknowing movie audience of millions, unfamiliar with the true history of Marvel comics. My father’s first screen credit didn’t appear until the closing crawl at the end of the film adaptation of Iron Man in 2008, after Stan Lee, Don Heck, and Larry Lieber. The battle for creator’s rights has been around since the first inscribed Babylonian tablet. It’s way past time to at least get this one chapter of literary/art history right. ‘Nuff said.

Around the Tubes

It’s a long weekend and things were rather quiet. What geeky things have you all been up to? Sound off in the comments. While you get a start to your day, here’s some comic news and reviews from around the web.

ICv2 – Thomas Woodruff Declines Eisner Nominations of ‘Francis Rothbart!’ – Will this end the drama?

Reviews

The Beat – Grand Slam Romance
Collected Editions – Robin Vol. 3: Secrets and Shadows

GRAND SLAM ROMANCE

Andrews McMeel Universal drops Dilbert’s Scott Adams

It looks like Dilbert creator Scott Adams has finally crossed a line with consequences as the newspapers and now a publisher dropping him have piled up over the past few days.

In a video, Adams went on a rant where he called Black Americans a “hate group” and suggested White people should “get the hell away” from them.

Adams was commenting on a Rasmussen Reports poll where 53% of Black Americans agreed with the statement “It’s OK to be White.” That phrase emerged on 4chan in 2017 as part of a trolling campaign and has a long history in the White supremacist movement.

On “Real Coffee with Scott Adams,” Adams stated:

If nearly half of all Blacks are not OK with White people – according to this poll, not according to me, according to this poll – that’s a hate group.

I don’t want to have anything to do with them.

And I would say, based on the current way things are going, the best advice I would give to White people is to get the hell away from Black people, just get the f**k away … because there is no fixing this.

In response to the comments, numerous newspapers have dropped Dilbert and some have run a blank square in the space until a replacement is found. Gannett, The Cleveland Plain Dealer, and The Washington Post are among those who will no longer run the strip.

Andrews McMeel Universal has released a statement stating they are “severing” their “relationship” with Adams and that extends to “all areas” of their business. They’re the distributor of the comic as well as print publisher.

Andrews McMeel Universal is severing our relationship with Dilbert creator Scott Adams. The process of this termination will extend to all areas of our business with Adams and the Dilbert comic strip.

As a media and communications company, AMU values free speech. We are proud to promote and share many different voices and perspectives. But we will never support any commentary rooted in discrimination or hate. Recent comments by Scott Adams regarding race and race relations do not align with our core values as a company.

Our creator-first approach is foundational to AMU, and we deeply value our relationships with our creators. However, in the case with Adams, our vision and principles are not compatible.

This isn’t the first controversial statement that he as made. He has compared women asking for equal pay to children demanding candy, stretched into conspiracy theories, advocated for killing a kid if they pose a danger to themselves or others, used tragedy for marketing, and has made anti-LGBT (especially transphobic) statements. Apparently all of that was ok and we finally know the line Adams couldn’t cross.

Scott Adams has since set up Dilbert and his videos as a paid subscription site where in his initial video claimed that “four organizations want to kill him” that “he knows of” including China, Hilary Democrats, Cartels, radical Black Americans who don’t like what they’re hearing, and ANTIFA (that’s five organizations Scott…).

Around the Tubes

Barbaric: Hell to Pay #1

It’s one of two new comic book days today! What are you all excited for? What do you plan on getting? Sound off in the comments below! While you think about that, here’s some comic news and reviews from around the web.

Boing Boing – Fox News invents a fake Trans Joker controversy to have a melt down over – Sigh.

CBR – Veteran-Owned Alaskan Comic Shop Asks for Help Amid Extreme Weather Setbacks – A shop needs our help!

Kotaku – Our Favorite Cosplay From Los Angeles Comic Con 2022 – What do you think? Any favorites?

Reviews

CBR – Barbaric: Hell to Pay #1
CBR – Night Club #2
Collected Editions – Robins: Being Robin

Missed and Late Payments, Creators Speak Out

Comic publishing isn’t an easy business and the history of shady deals, bad deals, corrupt publishers, and more could fill volumes of books. On Friday, creator Will Robson spoke out about some of that in a series of Tweets concerning late payments to creators for their work.

Has it become industry standard to pay creators ridiculously late for their work? I’ve struggled ALL year with ALL the large companies I work for to get paid on the agreed time. I’m talking MONTHS late… it’s sad how nervous I am to even talk about this publicly in fear of being blacklisted for future work. But I’ve heard so many horror stories from other freelance creators recently about fighting for their paycheque and I need to vent this all out and hopefully raise some awareness to make serious change.

Here’s how it works. You’re hired to write or draw a book. The deal usually is you have to complete 5-10 pages first & then you will receive a payment for that work a few weeks after completing it. This means that when you start a new project, it’s not guaranteed when exactly you’ll see your first payment because depending on the difficulty of the work (team book, locations, crowd scenes etc) the length of time it takes to create enough pages of work is always fluid. Usually if you’re a pro you can gamble that your first payment will be 4-5 weeks upon taking on the work. So you’re already looking at each project you take on as a month plus minimum expectancy of payment for half or a quarter of the issue you’re working on. Now, this can be annoying as if you’re constantly hopping from title to title, these payments can stagger between each other and you can find yourself in some financial jams. But recently I’ve had (what I thought) was a stroke of bad luck with getting paid on that agreed amount of time after finishing work. And I’m not talking a week late, I’m talking 5-10 WEEKS late. These delays have caused me and my family so much stress it’s unbelievable. I’ve dealt with delayed payments in the past working with smaller companies but the biggest companies in the business are now delaying payments regularly and I’ve really have had enough. A project I’ve worked on recently still hasn’t paid me. I was expecting payment for it in mid November. Remember that 4-5 week window of expected first pay I talked about? That means I started the book in October! How do these companies expected me to pay my bills and afford the Holidays? I’ve been constantly living in a state of survival mode all year with barely affording to get by due to these delays. I just find it ridiculous that I’m a trained and skilled worker who works 10-15 hour shifts 5-7 days of the week to hit these ridiculous industry standard deadlines that already take you away from having any sense of a normal family / social life to then have to worry about paying your bills or feeding your family. I mean, I get to draw these iconic characters owned by these large corporations who are making millions off of adapting freelancers like myself’s art & creativity. But when you’re drawing these characters & internally stressing over wether or not you can afford to buy your family Christmas presents this year due to payment delays then enough is enough.

I work hard.

I hit my deadlines.

Pay me.

Robson’s Tweets go others to speak out, with multiple naming both Valiant and AfterShock as two publishers with this issue. A few others have been hinted at, but not confirmed. An example of that here and here.

We can confirm one of the named publishers as they not only have delayed payments to creators, but also are late in other payments. We ourselves are owed money for advertising that took place on this site and while we were initially told “payment was coming soon”, recent outreach has been met with silence with the bill over 6 months late. Another publisher canceled a month long advertising campaign during SDCC less than 24 hours before it was supposed to launch and refused to compensate for the lost revenue.

Nonpayment and late payment should be worrisome for creators, as it’s a sign of instability and cash flow problems and in an already volatile economy, any sign should give pause for not just future business but also receiving what’s owed.

Our understanding, having talked to numerous individuals within the industry with direct knowledge, is that PPP loans kept multiple publishers afloat during COVID and now the publishers haven’t adjusted to a new economic reality and the market isn’t where it “needs to be” causing money flow issues that are compounded by recent distribution/shipping issues and the increase cost of materials/business.

The result is in long run, we probably won’t be seeing some publishers making it out of 2023 as is. We’re also likely to see creators relying more heavily on crowdfunding and bypassing the traditional publisher driven distribution system.

If you are having this issue and would like to speak anonymously for a follow up article, you can leave a tip below.

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Fairytales Bookstore and More Announces Maus Giveaway

Tennessee bookstore Fairytales Bookstore and More has announced they’re partnering with school librarians to give away free copies of Maus to local students.

Those interested in donating can use the code “DONATE” and take 30% off their purchase.

The campaign is in response to a local Tennessee school board’s decision to ban Maus from being used to teach the Holocaust due to “objectionable content”.

Those Who Ban Books are Never the Heroes of the Story

Maus

Today is International Holocaust Remembrance Day and inappropriately timed is news that a Tennessee school board has removed, aka banned, Maus from the curriculum due to “language and nudity” concerns.

Maus is the Pulitzer Prize-winning graphic novel by Art Spiegelman about the experiences of Holocaust survivors. The Tennessee school board of McMinn County voted 10-0 to remove the book from the curriculum to be replaced by another book that didn’t feature “objectionable” content. Maus is based on Spiegelman’s parents in 1940s Poland, their experiences of anti-Semitism, and their internment in Auschwitz. Jewish people are depicted as mice and Nazis as cats.

McMinn County Director of Schools Lee Parkison stated:

The values of the county are understood. There is some rough, objectionable language in this book and knowing that and hearing from many of you and discussing it, two or three of you came by my office to discuss that.

The word “damn” was brought up as an example of an objectionable word.

Talking to CNN’s New Day, Spiegelman said:

I’m trying to, like, wrap my brain around it. …I moved past total bafflement to try to be tolerant of people who may possibly not be Nazis, maybe… They’re totally focused on some bad words that are in the book. I can’t believe the word ‘damn’ would get the book jettisoned out of the school on its own.

I think they’re so myopic in their focus and they’re so afraid of what’s implied and having to defend the decision to teach ‘Maus’ as part of the curriculum that it lead to this kind of daffily myopic response.

English language arts instructional supervisors spoke out at the meeting explainging why the book was used in the curriculum.

Board member Tony Allman showed further ignorance by stating:

We don’t need to enable or somewhat promote this stuff. It shows people hanging, it shows them killing kids, why does the educational system promote this kind of stuff? It is not wise or healthy.

Allman apparently is more offended of reminding people about the six million murdered than the six million murdered. One wonders what Allman thinks about teaching the reality of slavery, and Jim Crow in the United States which also saw hangings and kids being killed.

An instructional surpervisor responded:

I was a history teacher, and there is nothing pretty about the Holocaust, and, for me, this was a great way to depict a horrific time in history.

Mr. Spiegelman did his very best to depict his mother passing away, and we are almost 80 years away. It’s hard for this generation. These kids don’t even know 9/11. They were not even born. For me, this was his way to convey the message.

Board member Mike Cochran stated in the meeting:

I went to school here 13 years. I learned math, English, reading and history. I never had a book with a naked picture in it, never had one with foul language. … So, this idea that we have to have this kind of material in the class in order to teach history, I don’t buy it.

We highly doubt that was reality and sure Cochran has no issue with the violence, rape, and murder that is depicted in the Bible.

The issue isn’t as it stands isn’t about dropping Maus for another text to teach about the Holocaust. It’s calling it “obscenity”, a slippery slope of a claim. Even the preacher of Footloose realized their mistake and what a slope that claim is. It should also be noted that no text has been suggested to replace Maus showing that part of the argument is dubious at best.

This is the latest example of book banning that is being pushed by right-wing provocateurs to make gains politically by stoking “culture wars”.

As has been shown, a dark money network is funding campaigns against “Critical Race Theory”, something not being taught in schools. This book banning is an off-shoot of that showing these pushes are about as natural as an oral bowel movement. The “movement” is being used as a wedge issue to whip up voters and by the right since they have nothing else to run on. It pits parents vs. bureaucrats (and teachers), a match that’s pretty easy to get traction on. The movement has been working for decades and continues the right-wing push to take over at the local level, first at the state and now even lower to get their regressive agenda passed.

The controversy and backwards thinking has just shined a greater spotlight on Maus causing it to sell out and rocket to #1 in numerous lists.

Al Ewing Speaks Out and Condemns Joe Bennett

Immortal Hulk #50

Al Ewing and Joe Bennett have been working together for the recent epic, and well reviewed, Hulk run Immortal Hulk since 2018. In recent months, Bennett’s negative behavior has begun to overshadow the collaboration for Marvel. Today, Ewing took to Twitter to speak out about Bennett and an image that has been making the rounds since 2017.

On Twitter, Ewing writes:

There’s an image doing the rounds that Joe Bennett drew back in 2017. I won’t link to it, but I have seen it, and it’s reprehensible. Thread follows.

If you’ve seen the image, you know what it is. An armoured swordsman, which I assume represents Bolsonaro given Joe’s commentary, slaughtering tiny, scurrying people, with the buck teeth and ears of rats. And big noses. One of them is cosplaying Dracula.

I’m assuming these are political enemies of some kind, but even if not, the tropes are apparent. Human beings as vermin being exterminated. Even if it’s no longer up, that it was drawn in the first place, signed, and so proudly displayed by Joe speaks volumes.

This isn’t the first issue with Joe that I’ve been made aware of. I’ve spoken behind the scenes, but that’s no comfort to people at the sharp end of this kind of brutal propaganda. My lack of public visibility on this has let people down, and I apologise.

In the interests of adding some material action to that apology, I’ve made donations to Rainbow Railroad and the Rainforest Trust. I understand if that feels like an empty or insufficient gesture for those reading this.

Immortal Hulk is done, but I won’t be working with Joe again. If people choose not to pick up my work with other artists in the future on the basis of my handling of this, I understand and accept that. If I’ve lost your trust, that’s on me.

I can’t speak for Joe on this. He can speak on it for himself. But I will say that it’s not up to him – or me – what those hurt by his behaviour in the past should be willing to accept from him now. He’s made his bed.

With all this said, I’m probably going to remain off Twitter myself for now, and not read or reply to mentions for a while. Again, if that feels insufficient, I understand. Thank you for reading.

Bennett has courted controversy within comics and out. Immortal Hulk #43 featured anti-Semitic imagery which was removed by Marvel after printing. Bennett expressed remorse over the art saying it was “wrong, offensive, and hurtful in many ways”. He also called it a “mistake”.

Bennett also has shown anti-LGBT sentiment replying with a laughing emoji to a transphobic comment as well as saying that a gay journalist should have been punched instead of slapped by a far-right journalist.

While Ewing has spoken up, Marvel has remained relatively silent. It’s clear Ewing is done working with Bennett now that the Immortal Hulk run is over but is that Marvel’s attitude as well? Time will tell.

« Older Entries Recent Entries »