Tag Archives: controversy

DC Cancels Red Hood After a Single Issue After Pressure

This week saw the debut of Red Hood, a more adult series featuring a character who has built up a fandom from writer Gretchen Felker-Martin, with art by Jeff Spokes. It’s received relatively positive reviews with a current 8.7 rating from critics and a 7.2 from users, even with some review bombing. But, the comic has already been canceled after just its first issue and while DC hasn’t said why, it’s likely due to Felker-Martin’s comments after yesterday’s assassination of controversial rightwing figure Charlie Kirk.

While DC didn’t give specifics they said in a statement to Popverse:

At DC Comics, we place the highest value on our creators and community and affirm the right to peaceful, individual expression of personal viewpoints. Posts or public comments that can be viewed as promoting hostility or violence are inconsistent with DC’s standards of conduct.

DC has told retailers it has canceled orders for future issues of the series and is also offering credit for all of the orders placed by retailers on the first issue, including sold copies. The ongoing series had its first three issues solicited, the first issue released September 10 with the next issue to have come out on October 2 and third November 12. The series was intended for a 17+ audience and not part of its more mature label DC Black Label, a curious move along with the release of another comic this week that is creator-owned and for all ages that teased a possible shift in the company’s publishing strategy.

Felker-Martin is no stranger to controversy, regularly being banned by social media platform Bluesky, and was banned again yesterday by the platform. She has been accused of antisemitism, support of Hamas, threatening statements towards JK Rowling, among other provocative statements that had been made well before she was hired by DC for this series. Felker-Martin recent post that’s most often shared:

The post was latched on to by regressive and rightwing elements within the industry that are known for their brigading to attack creators they disagree with politically, particularly creators who are minorities like African-Americans, LGBTQ+, and especially Trans individuals. Felker-Martin is Trans and numerous posts to DC’s social media attacks her for that. Kirk has said being gay is an “error” and has advocated that gay individuals should be stoned to death quoting a Bible verse that advocates for it during a debate and saying it affirms “Gods perfect law when it comes to sexual matters.” More of Kirk’s greatest hits of awfulness can be found here with lots of links out for evidence.

Trans people are a throbbing middle finger to God… …an abomination to the Lord, Your God.

-Charlie Kirk

Gretchen Felker-Martin’s firing coincides on the same day Matthew Dowd was fired by MSNBC for comments made during coverage of the shooting of Kirk continuing the trend of cancelation of “the left” while the right makes threatening and hyperbolic statements with no repercussions.

DC’s decision also rewards bigotry on full display in social media messages towards them and only encourages further similar action.

The firing also comes in an environment where parent corporations are regularly firing staff, censoring output, to appease Donald Trump and the current administration. DC is owned by Warner Bros. Discovery. Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav publicly stated that a Trump administration could offer a “pace of change and an opportunity for consolidation” for the media industry. Warner Bros. Discovery has announced a recent split back into two companies and who knows what future approval from the administration it will need. Zaslav has mentioned the need to consolidate streaming services to better compete as an example.

WBD confirmed that a company representative recently reached out to the Trump orbit seeking advice about how the company might advantageously interact with the White House and improve its Trump-age odor. The reported message was to look at the example of Amazon and Jeff Bezos paying Melania Trump $40 million to participate in a documentary about herself. Don Jr. might like a hunting and fishing show on the Discovery Channel, they were told. And that CNN could have more pro-Trump voices — suggestion provided.

Trump is a frequent critic of CNN which is owned by Warner Bros. Discovery. He has sued the news organization unsuccessfully multiple times. Find an example here and here. During his first administration, Trump’s antitrust officials sued to stop AT&T from buying Time Warner. Some believe that suit was due to Trump’s distate for CNN though officials have said that wasn’t the case.

Whatever’s best for stock prices…

Alien Books Releases a Statement Regarding Transphobic Bloodshot with Steps to Update the Dialogue and More Intense Review Going Forward

This week saw the latest relaunch of the Valiant Universe with Valiant Beyond: Bloodshot #1 now being published by Alien Books. The comic, written by Mauro Mantella, is a different take on Bloodshot with the character taking on Yakuza vampires and a drug called B-S made from the nanites in Bloodshot’s blood.

In my review, I thought the new direction was derivative of Marvel’s Blade with far too many elements we’ve seen from that series and generally hardcore Bloodshot or action fans would appreciate it but it wasn’t anything special and has been done before offering little new so far.

But, one bit of dialogue went completely over my head and after being pointed out, it’s something I can’t unsee. In one scene, Bloodshot battles vampires and the narrative goes on about “normalizing blood consumption” with fake blood and influencers and “parents who force their children into that irreversible change.” It echoes language used by TERFS and in anti-Trans panic to attack gender-affirming care that has been shown to save lives.

In a climate where rights for transgender are not only under attack but also being stripped away, the panels saw a flurry of condemnation from comic fans as well as numerous creators, including some who have previously worked on Bloodshot.

Alien Books has released a statement regarding the comic and scene with steps to update the dialogue and an effort to prevent something like this happening again.

Alien Books and writer Mauro Mantella sincerely apologize for the harm caused by the phrasing in Bloodshot #1. While the story takes place in a fictional world of vampires and cults, we understand that a specific line of dialogue has been read as alluding to real-world issues, specifically, the discrimination faced by trans people.

That was never the intention. The original line was written by an Argentinian creator and was unfortunately a case of nuance being lost in translation. We fully recognize that intent does not erase impact, especially when dealing with subject matter that affects real lives and communities.

We are taking the following steps immediately:

The dialogue in question will be updated for all digital and collected editions to better reflect the intended fictional context.

Going forward, all scripts will undergo a more intense review by our proof readers as part of our editorial process to ensure clearer, more responsible storytelling.

We appreciate the feedback from readers, creators, and industry peers who brought this to our attention. We take this seriously and are committed to learning from it.

Alien Books values inclusion, empathy, and creative responsibility. We will do better.

The statement has received a mixed response with requests for the original dialogue to be released before it was translated. Valiant has had a very bumpy recent history, and history overall, and this attempt to relaunch the comic universe is off to another stumble with this.

Angoulême International Comics Festival 2026 Threatened with a Boycott

Angoulême International Comics Festival

Courtesy of The Daily Cartoonist, nearly 400 artists and 12 associations have signed a petition to boycott the 2026 Angoulême International Comics Festival. The issue is the festival’s management company, 9eArt+. The company is accused of retaliating against a female employ who reported a rape at the 2024 event that was revealed after an investigation by L’Humanité magazine. The individuals and associations are calling for the festival to open the management contract to an open RFP or face a boycott of the upcoming festival.

Four of the last five Grand prix winners: Anouk Ricard (2025), Posy Simmonds (2024), Julie Doucet (2022), Chris Ware (2021), as well as notable American cartoonists: Art Spiegelman (Grand prix 2011) and Alison Bechdel have signed the petition. There’s over 2,200 signatures on it in total.

You can see the full list of signatories as well as join the petition here.

WE WILL NOT GO TO ANGOULÊME!

For several months, we, comic book professionals, authors, and other workers in the field, have been calling on the Angoulême FIBD Association to address the harmful nature of the contract it has had with the company 9eArt+ for nearly 20 years.

A company whose managerial practices have been questioned in several press articles, including an investigation by L’Humanité magazine that revealed the dismissal of an employee after she reported a rape during the 51st edition.

At the last ADBDA meeting on April 3, the FIBD Association discussed the possibility of terminating the contract it has with the company 9eArt+, but it has not expressed a desire to submit the festival’s management to an impartial call for projects. On the contrary, it seems to want to finalize its plan to merge into a simplified joint-stock company (SAS) with 9eArt+, which would, in effect, become the unlimited manager of the festival.

We want to firmly remind the FIBD Association that if, in more than 50 years of existence, the Angoulême festival has become an essential comic book event, it is thanks to the people who bring it to life and who animate it: comic book workers, authors, publishers, translators, journalists and critics… and of course the readers, through their loyalty to this event.
It now belongs to the community and, as such, it has become an event of public interest for the survival of our medium. It would therefore be unacceptable to constrain it with personal interests or authoritarian choices.

It would be unacceptable for the management of this event to be entrusted again for another decade, or even longer, and without consulting the parties who make up its vitality and diversity, to a company that raises many questions about its prerogatives.

Faced with this blindness and this obstinacy, faced with this unbearable appropriation and faced with the contempt shown towards our repeated calls, WE, comic book workers, inform the FIBD Association, as well as all its partners, public and private, that if it does not decide to denounce this contract in due form and to make a call for projects for the management of the festival, we will call for a massive boycott of the next edition of the festival in 2026.

Without us, this edition will be an empty shell!

CGE Releases a New Statement Regarding Codenames: Back to Hogwarts

Codenames: Back to Hogwarts

In July, CGE announced Codenames: Back to Hogwarts, a new edition/skin of the popular Codenames game. There was a swift condemnation of the game and CGE’s decision citing Harry Potter creator J.K. Rowling‘s use of her “Harry Potter wealth” to fund anti-transgender organizations, and she’d likely profit from the game’s licensing. The company then released a rather poor response to the controversy, only fanning the flames further.

On the eve of Gen Con, CGE has released a new statement showing some reflection and understanding as to the reaction to their release announcement.

CGE in their statement acknowledges that by supporting Harry Potter, they are indeed causing harm to the transgender community who Rowling has targeted. A reasonable solution can indeed be difficult in this situation as contracts have been signed and it’s unknown what that entails. Not releasing it would be the obvious solution, though they would face backlash from the regressive community and those who don’t look beyond their own interests. They could also donate all profits towards worthy causes that benefit the transgender community making its sale a fundraiser for the community that is maligned by the individual who would profit from it.

You can read the full statement below:

We’re grateful to everyone who engaged with us over the past few days and took the time to share their perspectives.

At CGE, our aim was never to cause harm, and we acknowledge that, with our recent Codenames announcement, we have. We are working hard within our constraints to find the best way forward and we will update you as soon as we can.

We understand that what we have done ahs caused distress, and are working towards a concrete solution with several members of the affected communities.

Please bear with us as we figure this out.

CGE steps in it with Codenames: Back to Hogwarts. Faces Backlash

Codenames: Back to Hogwarts

In July, CGE announced Codenames: Back to Hogwarts, a new edition/skin of the popular Codenames game. We didn’t cover it and won’t be covering it due to its connection with Harry Potter whose creator is a TERF on a mission of what we see as hatred towards the trans community. We don’t cover Harry Potter in general (not like it’s a comic), and absolutely have not once her beliefs were clear.

The tabletop game community is one of general inclusion where everybody is welcome to sit at the table and enjoy a game. So, for a company to embrace a property so tied into exclusion and bigotry is a bit perplexing. The fact that J.K. Rowling uses her “Harry Potter wealth” to fund anti-transgender organizations, and she’d likely profit from the game’s licensing, is even more infuriating.

To say CGE’s statement in response lacks is an understatement.

When we embarked on creating the newly announced version of Codenames many years ago, it was a dream coming true for many of us at CGE. The vast world of magic featured in the upcoming Codenames has been a source of inspiration. It ignited a passion for learning English and exploring new worlds through reading. It shaped our childhoods, sparked imagination, or gave comfort in difficult times. We know many people around the world share the same sentiment about this universe, even among those who have been hurt by the public views and actions of its creator. Deciding whether those feelings should also transfer to the once-beloved world is up to everyone, and we fully respect and understand those who do not wish to engage with this game. We still believe in the magic of stories and the connection they create between people.

As this is an ongoing conversation, we encourage everyone to approach discussion with care, empathy, and respect—both online and in person.

It calls for “care, empathy, and respect,” though embraces a bigot for profit. They don’t respect their community as they have locked responses to social posts, clearly not wanting to hear the feedback from the community and it should be noted a community that helped make Codenames the success that it is.

WB Games, which has released has released multiple Harry Potter video games, is another example of a company seeing dollar signs, and that’s what it is all about. We have not covered them since 2022 (from what I can tell) for similar reasons. The upcoming Harry Potter television show on HBO has us rethinking any future coverage concerning HBO (though it’s limited as is, so not much of a loss).

We wear our beliefs on our sleeves here at Graphic Policy. Inclusion, treating others well, supporting diversity, those are things baked into the site. We’re not always perfect, but we try our best. There are times we don’t connect, or even know about issues, or slip ourselves. Our beliefs results in editorial decisions to not support and promote releases, companies, or creators that we feel are the antithesis of that.

We’re standing with other sites/influencers/tabletop games against CGE’s decision concerning this release. We won’t be covering CGE until they give a proper response and do what’s right, which is not release the game or donate its profits to charity benefiting the transgender community. We stand with the trans community which has seen hatred and vilification that’s unwarranted and only comes from a place of hate.

We speak with our coverage. We speak with our dollars. There are numerous wonderful organizations and companies that support the trans community. Let’s shine a light on them and lift them up and support them.

Hugo Awards Team Members Resign Over Use of AI by Worldcon

The use of AI is controversial in creative spaces with a lot of the current use of the technology involving theft of the works of others. Three members of the Hugo Awards team have resigned over what would seem to be the use of AI by Worldcon.

In late April, Worldcon made a statement regarding the use of AI tools in its vetting process for program participants. In the statement, the convention said it used LLM to vet proposed panelists with the output analyzed after. It justified the use by saying it “saved literally hundreds of hours of volunteer staff time,” an excuse used by corporations to fire staff and not hire human beings for new positions. AI also uses a significant amount of energy and resources negatively impacting the environment.

The three individuals wrote in their announcement:

Effective immediately, Cassidy (WSFS DH), Nicholas Whyte (Hugo Administrator) and Esther MacCallum-Stewart (Deputy Hugo Administrator) resign from their respective roles from the Seattle 2025 Worldcon. We do not see a path forward that enables us to make further contributions at this stage.

We want to reaffirm that no LLMs or generative AI have been used in the Hugo Awards process at any stage. Our nomination software NomNom is well-documented on GitHub for anyone to be able to review. We firmly believe in transparency for the awards process and for the Finalists who have been nominated. We believe that the Hugo Awards exist to celebrate our community which is filled with artists, authors, and fans who adore the works of our creative SFF community. Our belief in the mission of the Hugo Awards, and Worldcon in general has guided our actions in the administration of these awards, and now guides our actions in leaving the Seattle Worldcon.

The Hugo Awards have been hit with issues and controversy over recent years. In 2024, the awards discovered and disqualified fraudulent votes. In 2023, it was accused of censorship due to it being held in China. Leaked emails suggested organizers tampered with votes and excluded potential nominees for political reasons.

Hugo Awards resignation

Rian Gonzales caught in tracing swipe for an Ultimate Spider-Man #15 variant cover

Ultimate Spider-Man #15 Rian Gonzales variant

Out in May, Marvel‘s Ultimate Spider-Man #15 features a cute variant cover from Rian Gonzales. The cover features Peter, MJ, and their daughter in a cute kawai-like style featuring rainbows, make-believe tea party, and more. Gonzales is accused of swiping at least the May part of the art from Nina, aka InkPangur, the creator of the webcomic Lilith’s Word.

Gonzales took to social media yesterday to share the reasons for the trace claiming a “creative rut,” and a need to “meet the deadline.” In the explanation Gonzales states that the issue has since been “resolved” and apologizes to everyone Rian has hurt. You can read the full statement below.

But, that resolution might not be a reality. Juby, aka CutTimeComic, gives more detail and refutes some of what Gonzales claims. The original art was drawn in 2017 by Nina for Juby as a birthday present. According to Juby, Nina attempted to resolve the issue privately which led to Rian leading to releasing a statement. According to Juby, the issue isn’t resolved. And Juby provides an overlay of the two pieces of art. Where Rian Gonzales calls it a “reference,” it’s pretty clear this is more of a trace when the images or really compared.

Check out the comparison of the original piece of art and Rian Gonzales’ version:

Nina vs. Rian Gonzales art

While there’s some differences between the two in detail and the right arm, the two images match up strikingly well.

The situation raises more questions about art Rian Gonzales has released and what else might have been swiped/traced from others as well as flaired up the debate between referencing and tracing.

We’ve reached out to Marvel regarding the status of the Ultimate Spider-Man #15 cover and if it will still be released. You can read Rian’s full statement below.

Around the Tubes

Sins of Sinister #1

It’s one of two new comic book days! What are you getting? Whare you excited for? Sound off in the comments! While you think about that, here’s some comic news and reviews from around the web to start the day.

ICv2 – Unfortunately, DC’s AI Mess Is Just the Beginning – Think it’ll get worse before it gets better?

The Beat – Former Wildstorm editor/Real World cast member Sarah Becker dies at 52 – Our thoughts are with her family, friends, and fans.

Reviews

The Beat – Sins of Sinister
ComicMix – Spider-Man: Cosmic Chaos

Vancouver Comic Arts Festival board resigns after controversy

The Vancouver Comic Arts Festival (VanCAF) board has resigned after a controversy over the banning of a creator from the convention. The festival released as statement last week that it had banned an Israeli-American comic creator due to her past service in the Israel Defense Forces.

Though not named, the artist was Miriam Libicki and the decision to ban her caused an uproar and charges of antisemitism against the show. As far as we know, no other members of the military have been banned due to their service. We reached out to the convention and have heard no response as of this article’s publication.

The original accountability statement released by VanCAF stated there was a “public safety” concern due to her prior role and that Libicki wouldn’t be allowed to return to the festival. It went on to apologize for “harm” it caused by allowing Libicki to exhibit. She has exhibited at every VanCAF up until 2023 when a exhibitor application deadline was missed. The 2 individuals who made the complaint in 2022 were also banned as stated by those with more insider information as to events.

Libicki was at the 2024 show to promote her graphic novel But I Live, which is a collection of work based on the experiences of survivors of the Holocaust. Libicki had agreed with VanCAF to just focus on that and not her graphic novel jobnik! which chronicled her military service during the second intifada and other previous graphic novels. The convention admits that after agreeing to it, it then did a 180 after the 2024 convention stating it “failed to take the correct precautions to ensure (its) community’s safety” leading to the first statement and Libicki’s ban.

The original “Accountability Statement,” which you can read above, was taken down after pushback and the convention went silent over the weekend.

VanCAF has released a new statement, not only apologizing for the original but their decision to ban Libicki and statements made. The current board of directors has resigned and only a few remain to hand over the convention to new leadership and staff. You can read the new apology below.

Scout Comics faces criticism from creators and in a twist, announce a partnership with Element Media Global

Scout Comics logo

It’s been an up and down few weeks for comic publisher Scout Comics. Once a “hot” publisher, the company has cooled over the past year and in recent weeks they’ve faced accusations of lack of payment and unscrupulous business practices by creators.

Things kicked off last week when Jarred Luján went public with issues on Twitter:

If you’re a new creator, please avoid @ScoutComics like the plague. Haven’t paid me for a book out over a year. Won’t answer emails. We delivered a completed, profitable book and still got screwed.

Spoke to the Editorial Director and he implied we’d be blacklisted for complaining. CEO came in acting like he’d help and now he’s ghosting us too. If it’s like that at the top, you know why everything else sucks.

I’ve tried for a year to work with these people and its clear they have no intention of working with us. Nothing resembling a partnership.

I also got a single statement about book sales and not a single one since.

Can’t promote books, can’t pay creators, but they got a full @Whatnot schedule!

My last email a month ago was “hey can you just cancel our contract and we can move past the money you owe me” and they still didn’t answer. That would have cost zero dollars, for whatever thats worth.

From there, numerous other creators came forward with similar stories including Honor Vincent, Rebecca Good, Brian Wickman, Adam Barnhardt, Massimo Rosi, Matthew Erman, and Dakota Brown. Some have stated they’ve been threatened with blacklisting in the industry and others just ghosted after a while. For a while, many have spoken to us about a dissatisfaction over marketing and how their comics have been handled forcing them to market releases themselves.

One Scout creator, in a since deleted tweet, said:

Where was this accountability when we repeatedly asked for details and figures and were instead greeted with anger. Denied a contract termination unless we paid 75k for the huge overprint we didn’t ask for. This is a company full of grifters, don’t believe a word of this at all.

Scout has been accused of stating comics are unprofitable and also engaging in large overprints that were not asked for. This gets them out of having to pay creators and sounds like the “creative” bookkeeping Hollywood engages in that has claimed a film like Men in Black is unprofitable. While there are some legit costs to publishers, like warehouse storage/distribution, unauthorized overprints sound less so.

Scout responded back:

Dear comics community,

Scout started as and remains a company created by and for creators. We love comics. We love reading comics, making comics, and publishing comics for other creators. We love the comics community.

While Scout has always striven to maintain high levels of service to our teams, recently a creative team expressed their frustration publicly due to not having had a response to their concerns in several months. This is true. We dropped the ball by failing to respond in a timely manner. We take full responsibility for our lack of response at that time due to internal miscommunication.

Regardless, we will continue to strive to do better and improve communication with all of our creators. Despite the complaints we have seen online, Scout has had very few creators reach out to us directly with concerns. We have actually had several creators reach out and support, which we appreciate.

As with all businesses, there will be missteps. The most important thing is to learn. At this time, we are openly welcoming any creator with a title at scout comics to reach out to our COO Lesa Miller at [email redacted] with any concerns they may have. All concerns will be listened to and all inquiries will be responded to in a timely manner.

As creators ourselves we understand the issues that have been presented to us. Thank you for your patience and grace while we endeavor to learn from the feedback we are receiving.

The company has been erratic in recent years. They outsourced their marketing which has dried up. Announcements trickle out and previews and review copies are non-existent. This was after moving to a publishing schedule which caused a gap between the release of first and second issues for series. The belief was this would give time to build interest in new launches. Instead, it feels like it has killed momentum.

Instead the publisher has focused on gimmicks, throwing out ideas and seeing what sticks. They’ve focused heavily on the live eBay site WhatNot, publishing plates, a subscription box (which we subscribe to and is a good idea), cards to be sold in stores with keys for digital comics, and overall trying to go more direct to consumer. There’s been numerous problems with releases. Some just don’t happen, sometimes are announced multiple times (Maze Agency was announced twice about a year apart) or happen, then fizzle, then get relaunched (we’re looking at you Vanity). The company, like many new publishers, seems more focused on television and movie deals than publishing comics. Scout of 2024 looks like the dirt mall version of its former self.

Months ago we were sent a link to a Comicbook Round Up profile for “Bredeen,” teasing it was Scout CEO Brenden Deneen who was review bombing various Scout titles. The anonymous email said it was targeting specific creators. Unfortunately that account has scrubbed its reviews but the internet never dies and the Wayback Machine has captured some of what was reviewed. Six Scout Comics are reviewed in that link with an average score of 1.67 while three Image titles are reviewed and an average if 8.83, two of which were given a 10. Why a CEO would do this is a mystery but the email we were sent called it unprofessional (which it is), toxic (also that), and weird includes the company president James Haick. Add in a lot of comings and goings, it all points to a publisher with numerous internal issues beyond payments an marketing.

Scout’s story seems to be one that has been familiar in recent years. Action Lab, AfterShock, and we’ve heard rumblings of more, have all seen issues when it comes to payments, creator rights, marketing and more. The bubble of small publishers banking on VC money and television/movie rights for profits looks like it has burst. The collapse of so many small publishers could also be a factor in recent woes at comic shops as the bottom 300 sales (which many of their releases were found in) were booming pre-pandemic, but that’s an article for another time.

Scout Comics Element Media

But, as we were wrapping up our coverage a new wrinkle has been added. Scout Comics has announced a partnership with Element Media Global, a subsidiary of Element Global, Inc.

The release calls the deal a “partnership,” but it sounds more like a bailout with mention of the launch of Dark Harbor Comics, a new horror/thriller imprint. Scout has relied on other imprints in recent years like Chispa and Black Caravan. In 2020 alone they announced six new imprints. Some of those imprints haven’t seen releases and a few of the announced plans in 2020 never came to fruition.

The release also states a “re-launch” for Scout in the Summer of 2024. It’s hard to not see this announcement as a scramble in reaction to many of the company woes mentioned above.

You can read the full release below:

Scout Comics & Entertainment Holdings, Inc. will partner with Element Media Global, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Element Global, Inc. (OTC:ELGL) to expand further into the comic book, original graphic novel, gaming, and multimedia space. This new iteration of Scout will also include the launch of Dark Harbor Comics, a new horror/thriller imprint. Under this deal, Scout and Dark Harbor Comics will re-launch in Summer 2024 with a genre-spanning line of comics, including both previously- announced titles and several recently signed books as well.
 
Steve Gagnon, co-CEO of Element Media Global, Inc., said, “We are incredibly excited to be partnering with Scout to expand into the comics and graphic novel space. They have a proven track record of producing quality comic books while having an impressive ability to sell their IP into Hollywood, as well as proving themselves to be incredibly nimble in a rapidly evolving market across all of our media brands.”
 
James Haick, President of Scout Comics, said, “The collaboration between Element and Scout is the beginning of something very special. Our shared visions and collaborative efforts are poised to help revolutionize the comic book industry. These initiatives will not only benefit our creators and employees, but comic fans in general. One of these initiatives is called SCOUT LAUNCH, which will bring new paying jobs to writers, artists, colorists, and more. We couldn’t have arrived here without the hard work and dedication from our current back-office team, our amazing printer Comic Impressions, our Scout HQ employees, and of course our talented creators. With July on the horizon, we all look forward to building anticipation for the extraordinary developments ahead.”
 
Richard Rivera, Publisher of Scout Comics, added, “I’m excited for the possibilities that will come from the re-launch this summer and confident that our amazing creators and important retail-partners, the local comic shops, will benefit from a streamlined, reliable publishing schedule.  It will shake things up, but in a great way, and Scout is eager to get everyone on board with the new vision. The partnership with Element is going to be game changing.”
 
About Element Media Global, Inc.
 
Element Media Global, a wholly owned subsidiary of Element Global, Inc. (OTC:ELGL), is involved in the development, and production of original films and television and the company centers its efforts on the expansion of streaming digital media that is changing the way individuals throughout the world consume content. Leveraging proprietary technology, Element plans to deliver interactive content in a more efficient and concentrated platform, resulting in a truly unique new fully interactive consumer experience. Element has recruited senior executives from across multiple verticals, including top producers, writer’s, director’s, development and distribution, technology executives and influencers. Element senior management team have combined this expertise with a portfolio of IP technology groups that can be integrated to deliver on Element’s platform promise as well as across all platforms in the market – www.elementglobal.com/subsidiaries/media.php.
 
About Scout Comics & Entertainment, Inc.
 
Scout Comics & Entertainment was founded in 2015 and has over 300 titles in their catalog. They have published Ringo Award-winning titles and several of their books have been selected by the National Library Association. Scout books have sold to Disney, Amazon Studios, Warner TV, State Street, Rooster Teeth, and FilmNation, among many others. Rounding out the executive team with Haick and Rivera are Brendan Deneen, Founder/CEO, and Lesa Miller, COO – www.scoutcomics.com/
 
Forward-Looking Statements Disclaimer:
 
This press release contains forward-looking statements within Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the following words: “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “ongoing,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would,” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. However, not all forward-looking statements contain these words. Forward-looking statements do not guarantee future performance or results and will not necessarily be accurate indications of when such performance or results are achieved. This press release should be considered in all filings of the Companies contained in the Edgar Archives of the Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov.

« Older Entries Recent Entries »