Tag Archives: lawsuit

Diamond and Trustee Morgan Fisher Dismissed from Sparkle Pop vs. Alliance Entertainment

In June 2025, Sparkle Pop sued Alliance Entertainment for what it believed to be Alliance’s violation of a non-disclosure and non-solicitation agreement stemming from Alliance’s attempt to purchase the assets of Diamond Comic Distributors during the chapter 11 process.

On July 2025, (old) Diamond jumped into the case joining in as plaintiffs in the adversary proceeding.

There was then an order by the court asking why Diamond and its trustee Morgan W. Fisher shouldn’t be dismissed as intervenors on the case.

Fisher and (old) Diamond filed a response on June 18 but then that response was withdrawn on August 6.

The Trustee has determined that, at this juncture, there is no continued benefit to the Estates from his participation in this Adversary Proceeding and that dismissal of the Debtors and Trustee from this Adversary Proceeding is appropriate.

As such:

ORDERED, that Diamond Select Toys & Collectibles, LLC; Comic Exporters, Inc.; Comic Holdings, Inc.; Diamond Comic Distributors, Inc.; and Morgan Fisher, Chapter 7 Trustee are hereby DISMISSED from this adversary proceeding.

What was a two-on-one case is back to just being Sparkle Pop vs. Alliance Entertainment. While there’s another lawsuit between (old) Diamond, Fisher versus Alliance Entertainment, the stepping back from this case is an intriguing one.

Loading Viewer…

Paramount’s CEO David Ellison Threatens to Exit California Unless the State AG Negotiates Regarding the Warner Bros. Deal

Veruca Salt with a David Ellison name tag

Paramount CEO David Ellison is taking another page out of the Veruca Salt playbook of stomping your feet until you get what you want. Ellison has told executives of Paramount that he will begin the process of exiting California on October 1 unless State Attorney General Rob Bonta negotiates a settlement regarding the antitrust suit regarding the takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery.

Bonta is leading a group of 12 state Attorneys General that have formed like Voltron in an antitrust lawsuit against Paramount in its attempted $110 billion (potentially $111 billion) takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery. Paramount had agreed to pause any business with the takeover until the trial ends or June 2027. The trial has been set to begin on March 2.

Paramount also faces a lawsuit from the Writers Guild of America as well as one filed by shareholders.

Bonta has released a statement regarding the threat:

In a span of weeks, Paramount agreed to halt the merger until a court decision or until June 2027, asked for a November trial, and is now back with another attempt to blackmail the state into letting an illegal deal through. Paramount has lost the plot as it continues to lose in court. It didn’t work the first time — on the eve of our July lawsuit — and it won’t work this time.

If Ellison follows through with his threat, the relocation would begin with the company’s headquarters and followed by studio jobs. The rumor or Ellison and Paramount leaving the state have swirled for some time.

Paramount faces an increased cost to its deal if it’s not closed by September and the trial alone adds about $1.3 billion to the $110 billion price tag. If the deal falls apart altogether, there’s a $7 billion termination fee. Warner Bros. Discovery can walk if the deal isn’t closed by June 4.

Paramount has been attempting to wage a PR campaign in its favor with Ellison rallying his allies to write op-eds supporting the merger. But, Paramount seems to be hurting its cause by trying to play public opinion as opposed to making concessions with the Attorneys General that may lessen their opposition.

With each volley, and the further strain on the Ellison fortune, the chances of this deal collapsing seems to increase with each day.

Consumer Lawsuit Challenging Paramount’s takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery is Dismissed

Warner Bros. logo

A challenge to Paramount‘s acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery has been dismissed. The group of consumers failed to establish standing according to U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguin. They are allowed to file a revised complaint.

The consumer lawsuit was filed in April and included five subscribers to pay-tv and streaming services who argued the merger would increase prices and decrease the diversity of viewpoints. The lawsuit also was seeking the divestiture of Skydance’s acquisition of Paramount last year.

The group of consumers challenged the merger but the judge wrote:

Plaintiffs’ standing theory amounts to little more than the assertion that they are consumers who watch television and go to the movies, and therefore a merger between entertainment companies would injure them.

Another issue in the case is that the plaintiffs’ injury was a single, historical price increase by Paramount+ but that injury wasn’t suffered in the same way by all five of the plaintiffs.

Martínez-Olguin is also presiding over two other antitrust cases over the same deal. One is the lawsuit brought by a dozen attorneys general and the other is the case brought by the Writers Guild of America. The attorneys general case has a trial date of March 2027. Another case involves shareholders claiming the Ellisons promised “illegal private benefits” to President Trump in exchange for the government approval.

Date Set for Paramount/Warner Bros. Discovery Trial

Warner Bros. logo

U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguin has set a trial date for March 2, 2027 for the antitrust lawsuit regarding Paramount‘s acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. The trial will conclude by March 19.

On July 13, a dozen attorneys general filed a lawsuit to stop the acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery by Paramount Skydance. The lawsuit raised antitrust concerns and a decrease of competition. On July 20, a temporary restraining order was granted that prevented the deal from “closing” or “consummating” or taking any steps that would integrate or consolidate the operations. That temporary restraining order was extended an additional two weeks and then on July 24 Paramount agreed to halt its acquisition while the court case played out, possibly to June 2027.

The delay is a big one because if the deal isn’t completed by September 30, the price increases 25 cents per share per quarter it’s not approved. That would add $627 million to the cost of the overall deal each quarter, or roughly $7 million per day. That means this will increase the cost roughly $1.3 billion if the trial goes the entire time.

Ethics Complaints Raised over FCC Commissioners Gifts from Paramount

Warner Bros. logo

Paramount Skydance‘s attempt to purchase Warner Bros. Discovery has even more stink surrounding it. Two government watchdog groups have requested for an investigation into ethics violations by Federal Communications Commission members. Members accepted luxury gala tickets while Paramount was working to get government approval for its $111 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery.

The Democracy Defenders Fund and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington have cited an investigation by ProPublica about how CBS or its parent company (which is now Paramount) have given tickets to FCC commissioners to the Kennedy Center honors gala. CBS sponsors the event. That gift acceptance included while the Paramount/Warner Bros. deal was going through the government approval process as well as other major business from Paramount, including multiple mergers.

Commissioner Olivia Trusty‘s financial disclosure lists two tickets to the December 2025 gala worth more than $12,000. Trusty voted to approve Paramount’s merger with Skydance.

FCC Chair Brendan Carr‘s financial statements shows he accepted tickets eight times since 2017 which is over $75,000 in gifts. He sat in a private skybox at December’s gala with Paramount’s CEO David Ellison and other Paramount and CBS executives. Carr voted for the Paramount-Skydance merger.

According to ProPublica, seven of the ten commissioners who have served since 2016 accepted tickets with a value of more than $260,000.

Federal ethics rules ban employees from taking gifts from any entity that does business with, is regulated by, or seeks action from the agency.

The Democracy Defenders Fund says that Carr and Trusty broke the rules on accepting gifts or even criminal laws from accepting illegal gratuities. Carr and Trusty should be required to repay Paramount the “fair market value” for their gifts and their annual disclosures should not be certified until they do so. The organization is also requesting Carr to be disqualified from any decision concerning the Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery merger.

Paramount had announced it was making a hostile takeover bid for Warner Bros. Discovery hours after the gala and Carr endorsed the deal three months later.

The Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery deal is on hold while a court case plays out between the company and a dozen attorneys general. The business deal is also facing other litigation as well as unknown decisions from other governments.

Breaking: Paramount Agrees to Halt its Acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery Until June 2027 or Court Rulings are Decided

Warner Bros. logo

In a legal filing, Paramount and state attorneys general have reached an agreement to delay the acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery to June 2027 or earlier if it makes it way through courts and a ruling is made before. The agreement needs to be approved by Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín, who is overseeing the case.

On July 13, a dozen attorneys general filed a lawsuit to stop the acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery by Paramount Skydance. The lawsuit raised antitrust concerns and a decrease of competition. On July 20, a temporary restraining order was granted that prevented the deal from “closing” or “consummating” or taking any steps that would integrate or consolidate the operations. That temporary restraining order was extended an additional two weeks before today’s deal.

The delay throws the entire deal into chaos as it potentially increases the cost to Paramount. For each quarter the deal doesn’t close beginning in October 2026 the cost increases $650 million. If the decision really stretches out until June 2027, that’d increase the cost nearly $2 billion. Paramount has stated that it might have to rework its financing if the price increases and with the volatility in the Ellison’s net-worth due to Oracle stock prices, the deal’s financial situation became far more complicated.

Paramount described the delay as a “significant win” as it will give the company “a direct path to a trial based on the evidence,” a spokeswoman said. “This is the fastest and clearest way to prove that this transaction is good for competition, good for consumers, and good for creators.”

Below is California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s press release regarding the deal:

California Attorney General Rob Bonta today announced securing an agreement with Warner Bros. and Paramount that would keep the entertainment titans from merging until June 1, 2027, or until after a decision by the court on the states’ claims, whichever comes first. If the court finds in favor of the states, the merger would be blocked pending appeal. Last week, Attorney General Bonta led a coalition of 12 attorneys general in filing a lawsuit challenging the unlawful merger, and this week, he celebrated a critical win when he secured a temporary restraining order pausing the merger. The Warner Bros./ Paramount merger is expected to result in higher prices, lower content quality, and fewer movies and TV shows. The proposed $110 billion merger — the largest in Hollywood history — would combine two of Hollywood’s five major film distributors and two of the five major owners of basic cable channels, extinguishing competition between Paramount and Warner Bros., and inflicting substantial harm on movie theaters, basic cable distributors, and ultimately, audiences nationwide. 

“Our argument against this illegal merger is straightforward: When too few corporations have too much power in markets central to American life, it makes things more expensive, and it makes things worse,” said Attorney General Bonta. “Today’s agreement is great news for audiences, movie theaters, and the many people who write, build, and create the art, news, and entertainment so many of us enjoy. We are eager to continue to make our case in court and celebrate another tremendous win in our effort to ensure this unlawful merger never sees the light of day.”

As part of today’s deal, Warner Bros./Paramount agree not to merge until 5 days after a decision on the merits of the states’ challenge or until June 1, 2027, whichever comes earlier. If the court finds in favor of the states, the merger would be blocked pending appeal. If there is no merits determination by June 1, 2027, the states can file a motion for a preliminary injunction.

For more than a century, Warner Bros. and Paramount have stood astride the film and television industry as independent sources of creativity and competition. The lawsuit alleges that the merger violates Section 7 of the Clayton Act, which holds that mergers that may substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly are illegal. The attorneys general allege that, if Warner Bros. and Paramount are allowed to merge, it would lessen competition in three markets: film distribution, anticipated blockbuster film distribution, and licensing cable TV channels.

And the release from the office of Attorney General Letitia James:

Attorney General Letitia James and a coalition of 11 other attorneys general today secured a months-long halt to Paramount Skydance Corp.’s (Paramount) $110 billion takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (Warner Bros.). On July 13, Attorney General James and the coalition sued Paramount and Warner Bros., alleging that their merger would illegally reduce competition throughout the film and television industries, harming workers, consumers, and businesses. Attorney General James and the coalition today secured a stipulation from Paramount and Warner Bros. that will delay the merger until after a court ruling on the merits of the lawsuit or June 1, 2027, whichever is earlier.

“From the workers and artists who bring stories to life to the families who buy tickets at the box office, Paramount’s illegal takeover of Warner Bros. is a bad deal for all those who count on a competitive entertainment industry,” said Attorney General James. “Halting this merger while our case proceeds is a critical victory in our efforts to uphold the law and protect the film and television industries. I look forward to continuing our case to stop this illegal merger.”

On July 20, Attorney General James and the coalition won a temporary restraining order preventing Paramount and Warner Bros. from carrying out their merger. Under the stipulation announced today, Paramount and Warner Bros. will continue to remain separate companies until five days after the court’s decision on the merits of the case or June 1, 2027, whichever comes earlier.

Joining Attorney General James in this case are the attorneys general of Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, and Washington.

For New York, this matter is being handled by Assistant Attorneys General Pratik Agarwal, Morgan Feder, and Will Margrabe and Attorney General Fellow Jaya Mantovani, all of the Antitrust Bureau, under the supervision of Bureau Chief Elinor Hoffmann and Deputy Bureau Chief Amy McFarlane, and with the assistance of Chief Economist Chitra Marti. The Antitrust Bureau is part of the Division for Economic Justice, which is led by Chief Deputy Attorney General Christopher D’Angelo and overseen by First Deputy Attorney General Jennifer Levy.

Restraining Order Against Paramount’s Warner Bros. Discovery Acquisition Extended

Warner Bros. logo

On July 13, a dozen attorneys general filed a lawsuit to stop the acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery by Paramount Skydance. The lawsuit raised antitrust concerns and a decrease of competition. On July 20, a temporary restraining order was granted that prevented the deal from “closing” or “consummating” or taking any steps that would integrate or consolidate the operations.

Now, the judge has extended that restraining order by an additional 14 days, through August 17. The reason is to give the parties in the case more time to set an extended schedule for legal proceedings.

A hearing is currently set for August 3 to address the motion by the states and a preliminary injunction that could outright block the deal.

Paramount, though, has filed a motion for a three-day evidentiary hearing to take place later in August instead of that August 3 motion. They want that format so they can cross-examine the states’ expert witnesses. The states have said it’s an attempt to get around the process and decrease the time for the states to prepare their argument before the court.

The European Commission Approves Paramount’s Acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery with Conditions

Warner Bros. logo

The European Commission has approved Paramount Skydance‘s $111 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. The approval does come with some conditions.

  • Paramount must terminated its stake in a theatrical distribution joint venture with Universal Pictures called United International Pictures. This must be done within 13 months of the closing of the transaction.
  • It can not go into an agreement or understanding with Universal to co-distribute films in the European Union for 10 years.
  • The company can’t move the distribution of Warner Bros. films from their existing distributor to the one used by Paramount where that distributor also distributes Universal’s or Disney’s films in Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Sweden.
  • Paramount won’t shift its distribution of its films to the distributor used by Warner Bros. where that distributor also distributes Universal or Disney films.

The commission felt that there was enough competition for film production in the EU and US including Disney, Universal, Sony, MGM, A24, Lionsgate, and more. It also didn’t think there was issues when it came to the overlap in pay-tv channels, in particular for children.

The deal still has many hurdles to go before it’s completed. United Kingdom’s Competition and Markets Authority must still approve the deal plus there’s multiple lawsuits including one brought by the attorneys general from a dozen states that has led to a temporary restraining order concerning the deal. Paramount has requested a speedy trial and skip a hearing regarding the restraining order.

Paramount has filed for an Expedited Evidentiary Hearing to Avoid a Lengthy Process and Increased Cost to get Warner Bros. Discovery

Warner Bros. logo

The clock is ticking for Paramount Skydance when it comes to their takeover over Warner Bros. Discovery. The business move has a temporary restraining order granted preventing it from going forward inching the entertainment company closer to its September 30 deadline to complete the deal.

On July 13, a dozen attorneys general filed a lawsuit focused on antitrust and competition against the deal which would have Paramount Acquiring WBD. On July 20, a judge granted a temporary restraining order preventing the deal from being “closing” or “consummating” or taking any steps that would integrate or consolidate the operations.

Paramount has filed a motion for an abbreviated three-day evidentiary hearing to present its case to the court. A hearing was set for August 3 but Paramount is asking for that to be pushed to the week of August 17 or August 24 with a mini trial instead of a focus on the preliminary injunction.

Paramount wants the case to go quickly as the cost to purchase WBD increases if the deal isn’t done by September 30. The price increases 25 cents per share per quarter it’s not approved. That would add $627 million to the cost of the overall deal each quarter, or roughly $7 million per day. This lawsuit will likely drag on for months if it moves forward making it unlikely the deal will close by that date. The company has said delays could force it to renegotiate the deal’s financing, cause uncertainty for its stock price, or end the transaction altogether.

Anthropic’s $1.5 Billion AI Copyright Settlement is Approved

Anthropic

A judge has signed off on the $1.5 billion settlement of a class action lawsuit against Anthropic for its misuse of their books to train their AI.

U.S. District Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin granted the approval, the largest known settlement of a U.S. copyright case, and rejected claims that the settlement was too small.

The deal was initially approved in September 2025 by now-retired Judge William Alsup.

The lawsuit was launched in 2024 and said that Anthropic used books without permission to teach the artificial system, Claude.

The ruling was a bit mixed in that some of the use was ruled as fair use but the company was nailed for saving more than 7 million pirated books into a “central library.” A trial was scheduled for December.

Authors and other copyright holders filed claims covering over 92% of the more than 480,000 works included ​in the settlement, an attorney for the authors said during a court hearing.

Some authors believed the settlement was not large enough and that the attorneys were receiving too much from the settlement. The attorneys were receiving more than $101 million of their $187.5 million in their requested fees.

Separate lawsuits have been filed by authors who have opted out of the settlement.

« Older Entries