It was as if the collective scream of joy of a million geeks was heard last night as word came down that Marvel would be entering into a partnership with Sony to create future Spider-Man films. This would mean that Spider-Man would be entering the Marvel Cinematic Universe and interacting with Captain America and Iron Man, something before last night that was just a dream.
While Marvel has been a juggernaut at the box office for the last half-dozen years, that wasn’t always the case. Marvel wasn’t always in the move business, and for various reasons the company to licensed out their X-Men universe to Fox and Spider-Man to Sony. This means that those two movie studios have the rights to the characters within those worlds when it comes to movies (among other things) and that they couldn’t appear in the Marvel universe without some fancy footwork. That fancy footwork has happened and Marvel and Sony are now teaming up for future films.
But, is this actually a good thing? Here’s why I’m not convinced and possibly what can be done to make these films special (and I’m not even going into the fact that Marvel’s releases so far have been the same thing over and over).
1) Yet Another Beginning – Sony’s original Spider-Man trilogy began a little over dozen years ago and the latest reboot just three years ago, with just five years between the two takes. It was sixteen years between the first Batman films in contrast, and ten years between the last Batman film and the reboot. This introduction possibly means we’d have yet another origin story and absolutely a reboot in another two years.
How to fix this – Skip the origin story, we all know it. Unless this Spider-Man greatly veers from what we’ve seen before, speed through the origin and get right to the meat of the story. The smarter move would be to continue what Sony’s already done, in essence making The Amazing Spider-Man and its sequel canon and continue the story from there.
2) Sony didn’t have a bad track record – When you look at films based on Marvel characters, Sony’s Spider-Man films hold 4 of the top 10, and The Amazing Spider-Man 2 ranks 16th domestically. When it comes to global earnings, all five Spider-Man films are in the top 10. That’s an impressive record when you look at the box office. When you adjust the earnings for inflation, the original Spider-Man trilogy holds spots 2, 3, and 4 domestically. All together the five films have earned just shy of $4 billion at the box office and average $792.66 million dollars a film. Marvel’s 11 films (including the original Hulk and Big Hero 6) have earned $7.9 billion for an average of $719.15 million a piece. Spider-Man has two films higher than their average (40%). Marvel has three (27%). That’s actually a good track record for Sony. Which leads us to….
3) Marvel’s record isn’t better than Sony – Remember all the griping about Iron Man 3? How about Thor: The Dark World? The Incredible Hulk or Hulk? For as much as folks praise the films, and the amounts they earn, the quality of the films vary greatly. Marvel’s record for sequels (and even a reboot) is not better than Sony’s, so why should we expect them to do better than Sony when it comes to Spider-Man? Quality is subjective, but to say Iron Man 3, or 2 are better than the original is just false. Much like Spider-Man 2 and 3 were worse than Spider-man. Iron Man 3, Thor 2, and Captain America 2 did out-earn the originals, but so did Spider-Man 3, and even the director of the film has said it was bad.
4) We already have the everyman – Spider-Man’s fantastic role in the Marvel comic universe is the everyman we can relate to. He’s a teenage super hero who deals with similar things we do, dating, homework, getting picked on. It just so happens he has powers and fights crime. In the Marvel Cinematic Universe we already have that covered with Phil Coulson, the character who has appeared in almost every Marvel film and is the “average” person we relate to. He is supposed to be us in the film, much like Spider-Man (and his alter-egos of Peter Parker or Miles Morales) is in the comics.
5) Do we need another white male? – Iron Man, Hulk, Hawkeye, Captain America, Thor, notice a pattern here? All are white men, and four of the five have had multiple stand-alone movies made. Peter Parker can be a teenager, or he can be in his 20s, the former would be something “new” but the latter not so much. Even Guardians of the Galaxy centered around Peter Quill, another white male, and all of these folks tend to save the day. White male saviors gets old really quick. Do we really need another one? It’s time to switch things up.
How to fix this – Two words. Miles. Morales. Forget Peter Parker, and give us the popular Ultimate Universe version of Spider-Man who really paved the way for diversity of characters in modern comics. Imagine the reaction of the public (and kids – see spot 10 below) if their new hero is a teenage half-black, half-hispanic hero.
What we need is more diversity, and that leads us to….
6) Spider-Man’s entry has shifted Black Panther and Captain Marvel (and Inhumans) release date – Marvel has bumped back the release dates for the Black Panther and Captain Marvel’s solo films, by about six months. This is to make way for “Marvel’s” Spider-Man before even more before them. Marvel can only work on so much at a time, and already the two films that would actually focus on minority characters, something the Marvel Cinematic Universe desperately needs, are pushed back for another film starring a white male (though doesn’t have to).
And that leads to….
7) Less of a reason to mine Marvel’s catalog and take risks – If Marvel had a juggernaut of a franchise in Spider-Man, do you think they’d have needed to give us Guardians of the Galaxy? Not having access to Spider-Man and the X-Men is a GOOD thing when it comes to Marvel’s movies. It’s forced them to think outside the box of films to do, and their storylines. Add in the Spider-Man franchise, and that’s less focus on other things they could do, because remember, it’s not just Spider-Man that Sony was planning, but also a film based on the Sinister Six which was to come out in 2016. That’s a lot to work on and wedge in, and as I’ve stated above, Marvel doesn’t always have a fantastic record for their films.
8) Is MORE continuity a good thing? – What’s one of the top complaints about comics? People don’t know where to start, and there’s 50 something years of stories and continuity they need to catch up on. This is such an issue DC Comics is moving away from continuity to focus on stories you can just pick up and enjoy in comics. Marvel is weaving a massive story throughout their films leading up to the two-part Avengers: Infinity War in 2018 and 2019. Add in Spider-Man and you have yet another film franchise you’ll need to go see to catch-all of the story. If you want to see how this is already tripping up Marvel, you can just look at last year’s Guardians of the Galaxy whose wedging in of Thanos, and even the Infinity Gems, seemed a bit convoluted and more of just a way to get us from point A to point Z.
How to fix this – Keep it all to nods and cameos. There’s nothing that says Spider-Man HAS to be in the Avengers, or Captain America has to show up in Spidey’s film. There’s nothing that says the Spider-Man film HAS to be a part of the storyline leading up to the Infinity War. Keep it to nods and winks and things will work out great.
But then there’s….
9) Spider-Man in Civil War wasn’t a good thing – Comic fans are pumped for Captain America: Civil War, which is based on the epic Marvel storyline Civil War. In 2006 and 2007 Civil War saw the Marvel heroes split down the middle as the government forces them to register with the Super Hero Registration Act. This forces them to reveal their identities to the government, splitting the camps into a battle over civil liberties. The storyline had some fantastic moments and took on a subject very much in the public eye. This is a good thing. The upcoming third Captain America film will do its own spin on the story. Spider-Man was front and center (in a way the everyman caught in the middle of the debate), and SPOILER, reveals his identity to the world in an act that’s pro-registration. This leads to his Aunt May being shot (showing why secret identities are needed), and Spidey regretting the decision and cutting a deal with Mephisto to erase the fact he demasked. That was the much hated One More Day storyline. He had to give up his marriage to Mary Jane Watson in a sort of reboot. Yes, within a year the unmasking of Spider-Man was so bad Marvel actually retconned it out of the existence. So, tell me again why people are excited about his possibly being included in the film?
10) Will a teenager work in the Marvel Cinematic Universe? – A super soldier, a billionaire scientist, a rage machine scientist, deadly assassins, and a god. And you want to throw a teenage in the mix? One of these things is not like the other! There are jokes about how Batman should be in jail for child endangerment, and you want to add the same joke to the Avengers? Unless, Spider-Man isn’t a teenager and in his 20s, which leads us back to the issue of another white guy in the films. The fact that Spider-Man will first appear in an upcoming Marvel film, before his own next one, says the character will likely be tied into it pretty tightly.
How to fix this – The solution I’d prefer is to go with Miles Morales and give him his own corner of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. He’d save the day, and then SHIELD or Captain America would find him at the end of the film to congratulate him. This ties him into the Marvel Cinematic Universe, but doesn’t make him beholden to it. The other option is to do what Fox did with the upcoming Fantastic Four reboot and change the ethnicity of Peter Parker if you were to make him in his 20s.
11) Sony still has the final say! – Though many folks are acting like Spider-Man will be handled the same way as all the other Marvel films, the fact is, they are putting it together, but Sony has the final say. Here’s the exact quote from the announcement:
Sony Pictures will continue to finance, distribute, own and have final creative control of the Spider-Man films.
Want to know why the Spider-Man films have issues? If you ask those involved, it was Sony’s involvement. They are still being involved, and you can expect them to continue to meddle. The world collaboration was used in the release, and a release’s wording (especially a joint one) is gone over with a fine tooth comb. Marvel doesn’t have full creative freedom, they now just have a second boss to deal with.
Which leads us too….
12) Two bosses isn’t any better – Remember the kid in Iron Man 3 and how that entire part of the movie sucked? That had Disney written all over it. Now, when creating these films Marvel will not only have to deal with Disney’s input, but also Sony’s (see above). We all know from our own work experience, one boss is fine, two is WAY worse.
After all of the above, if you’re still super pumped about Marvel’s role then god bless you. I’m taking a wait and see approach. The release put it best “opens up fantastic new opportunities for storytelling and franchise building.” There’s a lot of opportunity, but that also means a lot of possibilities of failure.
It won’t take long to see, the next Spider-Man film will be released July 28, 2017.