Minnesota GOP vs. Neil Gaiman
In Minnesota, House Republicans are examining state funding for some arts and cultural heritage groups. On Tuesday they introduced an amendment though would cut funding to some organizations. Rep. Dean Urdahl who introduced the legislation suggested it was Republican leadership that prompted the move. The legislation would also force groups to compete for the money. House Majority Leader Matt Dean said he just reminded Urdahl he had support of the Republican caucus. But, how does Neil Gaiman get involved in this?
In the Star Tribune article on the subject:
Dean also singled out a $45,000 payment of Legacy money that was made last year to science fiction writer Neil Gaiman for a four-hour speaking appearance. Dean said that Gaiman, “who I hate,” was a “pencil-necked little weasel who stole $45,000 from the state of Minnesota.”
Gaiman addressed the fee last May:
The main reason I got a speaking agency, ten years ago, was because too many requests for me to come and speak were coming in,” Gaiman continued. “And the speaking requests were, and are, a distraction from what I ought to be doing, which is writing. So rather than say no, we’ve always priced me high. Not Tony Blair high, or Sarah Palin high (last time I read about them, they’re about $400,000 and $150,000 respectively). But I’m at the top end of what it costs to bring an author who should be home writing and does not really want a second career as a public speaker to your event. So if you want to pay me to come in and talk, it’s expensive
Gaiman has donated the money (minus commissions) to two charities. The money was earmarked specifically to bring authors to suburban libraries and if unused did not carry over into the next year (use it or lose it!).
We’ve reached out to House Majority Leader Dean for comment and to see how exactly Gaiman “stole” money from the state of Minnesota.
Discover more from Graphic Policy
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Good note! While I’m against spending taxpayer money on things like this, just on principle, Mr. Dean was certainly out of line to say Gaiman “stole” his speaker’s fee. Would Dean have objected if he liked Gaiman? Probably not–and that’s the root of the government-spending problem; every politician has their own “worthy” causes they spend our taxes on. As for Gaiman, kudos on his use of the money!
There’s an update, Gaiman got a pseudo apology, http://graphicpolicy.com/2011/05/05/minnesota-politician-apologizes-to-gaiman-mom-made-him/
And he also points out the dollars claimed isn’t correct, making Dean a liar prone to hyperbole.
But it must be nice to get paid to talk for four hours…
Though I’ve talked for hours, I don’t usually get paid for it. Maybe travel, but that’s about it.