Tag Archives: antitrust

Paramount Meeting with Attorneys General Canceled Due to “Lack of Good Faith”

ace attorney canceled

Late last week, news broke that Paramount would have a meeting this Monday with the Attorneys General suing them to stop the acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery over antitrust concerns. The meeting was ordered by the judge and an attempt at mediation before the trial which begins March 2027. That meeting has now been canceled according to California Attorney General Rob Bonta citing a “lack of good faith” in the settlement talks.

In a statement, Bonta said:

My office had a meeting with Paramount on Friday. Paramount did not maintain the confidentiality of that meeting. Not only did Paramount leak the alleged substance of settlement discussions, but they misrepresented these discussions, demonstrating a lack of good faith.

As soon as Paramount stops playing games and engages sincerely, my office is happy to meet again.

Bonta is leading the dozen attorneys general who have banded together in the lawsuit.

Paramount is attempting to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery for about $110.8 billion. They have agreed to delay the closing of the deal until as late as June 2027 as part of the lawsuit.

Bonta has previously accused Paramount of playing games with their threat to move their company out of California as well as its attempt at a $1.88 billion bond from the dozen states as well as the Writers Guild of America which is also suing.

Paramount and State AGs to Have Settlement Talks Next Week and Gavin Newsom Responds to Threats of Paramount Leaving California

The trial between a dozen state Attorneys General and Paramount over its attempt to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery doesn’t begin until March 2, 2027, but the parties will meet next week to discuss a settlement. After approval from the Trump administration and numerous other countries, a dozen Attorneys General sued Paramount in July in attempt to stop its acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery for $110.8 billion. Antitrust concerns were raised by the deal which would shrink film and television distributors, have paramount control another major news source in CNN, among other issues.

Representatives from Paramount and the offices of the Attorneys General will meet on Monday to discuss the case. The meeting though is mandated under the mediation procedure, so don’t read too much into it. It’s a common step and has been mandated by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta said about the meeting:

As I’ve said before, generally for all of my cases, I prefer to resolve disputes in the boardroom, not the courtroom. As I’ve also said, if the opposing party in litigation wants to meet in good faith to make a sincere effort to resolve the case, we’ll meet. And as I have further said, any potential discussions about the Paramount-Warner Brothers merger will be unproductive absent robust structural remedies on the table that address our concerns.

As it stands today, the proposed Warner Bros./Paramount merger will mean higher costs, less competition, lower wages, job cuts, and fewer movies and TV shows. This merger violates long-standing federal antitrust law, and we are committed to enforcing the law.

Paramount has stated they’re willing to work towards and negotiate a solution without a trial and there has been calls from other parties, some unions and theater chains, for the parties to negotiate a settlement.

Paramount has also threatened to leave California over the lawsuit, a move Bonta sees as an attempt to put pressure on the AGs and get them to settle.

Paramount needs the settlement more than the AGs. If the deal isn’t closed by September 30, a ticking fee begins at about $7 million a day, increasing the cost of the deal. The trial has been set for March 2, 2027 and will last 17 days. The delay through the trial, about 169 days, will cost the company $1.15 billion. Paramount is currently seeking a bond of $1.88 billion from the AGs as well as the Writers Guild of America who is also suing. A decision on that won’t happen until late September

Current California Governor Gavin Newsom has said he is taking Paramount’s threat to leave the state “seriously” and hopes it doesn’t happen.

And I’m of the belief they don’t want that to happen. It’s not, I don’t think, in the company’s long-term interest, but I take it seriously.

I’m concerned about the state, our reputation.

Newsom has also teased there are discussions between parties already happening regarding the antitrust lawsuit. Newsom isn’t running again for Governor due to term limits, and his time in the position will end in January 2027, months before the trial is set to begin.

Newsom is teasing a running for President in 2028. When he does, he’ll need/look for the support of Ari Emanuel, the CEO of WME Group and CEO and executive chairman of TKO Holdings, for that run. Emanuel has become a kingmaker in politics wielding a lot of influence in both parties, though it is rumored Ari’s brother Rahm is also thinking of running for President. Importantly for this, Emanuel is an ally of Paramount CEO David Ellison and has penned an op-ed in support of the deal. Those opposed to the deal would likely have a more difficult time getting his support for their political ambitions.

Hollywood Teamsters Call out Paramount over the Warner Bros. Discovery Acquisition

While the DGA and IATSE unions kiss Paramount‘s ass and call for a settlement between Paramount and a dozen state attorneys general in their antitrust lawsuit, the Teamster Local 399 is taking another route. Paramount is currently attempting to purchase Warner Bros. Discovery for $110 billion.

Lindsay Dougherty has released a statement to Deadline that it’s time to cut the crap.

At every step of the way, Teamsters have asked for data to show how this merger would be good for our industry, our members and domestic production. Touting worker prosperity, without commitments, while simultaneously threatening their livelihood in the press as a bargaining chip begs the question — what is in this deal for American film and television workers?

The Teamsters had previously called on the Department of Justice to block the merger. Trump’s Department of Justice approved the deal. David and Larry Ellison have been accused of supporting and being friends with Trump which resulted in the acquisition to receive little scrutiny and is reported to have ignored government lawyers who were going to recommend a challenge to the deal.

The deal at $110 billion (currently, more on that later) and heavy debt by Ellison will force the company to make cuts quickly and will likely result in massive layoffs. After the purchase of Fox by Disney, the House of Mouse laid off thousands of workers. Paramount will have to do the same, if not worse, if this deal goes through.

Paramount CEO David Ellison has promised theater owners the combined mega-studio would release 30 films a year, and has assured CNN would have editorial independence. They’ve recently said everything is on the table in hopes to settle the lawsuit from the attorneys general. Paramount’s Chief Legal Officer Makan Delrahim has stated they’re willing to work towards a resolution and there have been rumors that includes selling CNN, though having an oversight board has also been floated. Ellison has threatened to pull the company from California if the antitrust lawsuit continues.

With a trial not set for March 2027, Paramount is scrambling to cut a deal beforehand. Each day beyond September 30, the price of the deal increases $7 million a day. With a promise to put the deal on hold until June 2027 or the conclusion of the trial, the $110 billion deal could increase by about $1.3 billion.

That increasing price is only one factor as to why the deal might be in jeopardy. David Ellison’s father Larry Ellison, the founder of Oracle, has backed a large portion of the deal with about 49% of it being financed by foreign entities. Larry’s wealth is tied heavily into Oracle stock which has been volatile due to questions regarding its investment in data center infrastructure and whose fortune now relies heavily on AI succeeding. With the belief of an AI bubble growing, it’s very likely Ellison’s fortune could tumble quickly and soon. The longer the deal drags out, the more the risk increases for Ellison in the bubble popping and the deal collapsing resulting in a $7 billion payout to Warner Bros. Discovery for the deal ending.

Paramount’s CEO David Ellison Threatens to Exit California Unless the State AG Negotiates Regarding the Warner Bros. Deal

Veruca Salt with a David Ellison name tag

Paramount CEO David Ellison is taking another page out of the Veruca Salt playbook of stomping your feet until you get what you want. Ellison has told executives of Paramount that he will begin the process of exiting California on October 1 unless State Attorney General Rob Bonta negotiates a settlement regarding the antitrust suit regarding the takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery.

Bonta is leading a group of 12 state Attorneys General that have formed like Voltron in an antitrust lawsuit against Paramount in its attempted $110 billion (potentially $111 billion) takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery. Paramount had agreed to pause any business with the takeover until the trial ends or June 2027. The trial has been set to begin on March 2.

Paramount also faces a lawsuit from the Writers Guild of America as well as one filed by shareholders.

Bonta has released a statement regarding the threat:

In a span of weeks, Paramount agreed to halt the merger until a court decision or until June 2027, asked for a November trial, and is now back with another attempt to blackmail the state into letting an illegal deal through. Paramount has lost the plot as it continues to lose in court. It didn’t work the first time — on the eve of our July lawsuit — and it won’t work this time.

If Ellison follows through with his threat, the relocation would begin with the company’s headquarters and followed by studio jobs. The rumor or Ellison and Paramount leaving the state have swirled for some time.

Paramount faces an increased cost to its deal if it’s not closed by September and the trial alone adds about $1.3 billion to the $110 billion price tag. If the deal falls apart altogether, there’s a $7 billion termination fee. Warner Bros. Discovery can walk if the deal isn’t closed by June 4.

Paramount has been attempting to wage a PR campaign in its favor with Ellison rallying his allies to write op-eds supporting the merger. But, Paramount seems to be hurting its cause by trying to play public opinion as opposed to making concessions with the Attorneys General that may lessen their opposition.

With each volley, and the further strain on the Ellison fortune, the chances of this deal collapsing seems to increase with each day.

The UK Competition and Markets Authority and Culture Secretary Approves Paramount’s Acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery after Guarantees

A government again has laid down choosing not to protect consumers and workers as the UK culture secretary Lisa Nandy as well as the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority have both cleared the deal for Paramount‘s $110 billion+ takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery.

To secure approval from Nandy, Paramount had to agree to some concessions.

  • Paramount’s Channel 5 will continue to operate as a public service broadcaster until the end of 2034. It will also retain editorial independence and remain separate from other news operations like Paramount’s CBS News and Warner Bros. Discovery’s CNN International.

Paramount has come under scrutiny for its takeover of CBS News removing its editorial independence for a more right-wing bent calling into question is history of quality journalism. Paramount owner David Ellison appointed Bari Weiss as the head of the news service as well as a conservative to act as its ombudsman, an “internal advocate for journalistic integrity and transparency.”

  • Paramount has also agreed that its linear and on-demand services in Britain would retain distinct editorial identities for five years, including its children’s TV content.
  • There’s also a guarantee that the deal would not reduce the number of people commissioning content in Britain, and Channel 5 would continue to back UK-originated content covering drama, factual, and entertainment shows.

The deal still faces multiple lawsuits in the United States including one from a dozen state attorneys general as well as the Writers Guild of America. Another case involves shareholders claiming the Ellisons promised “illegal private benefits” to President Trump in exchange for the government approval.

Paramount has received competition clearances in the United States, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Kuwait, Montenegro, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Ukraine, and by the European Commission, and the COMESA Competition Commission.

It also has received foreign direct investment clearances in Australia, Belgium, Czechia, Germany, France, Italy, New Zealand, Romania, Spain, and Slovenia. The transaction was also unconditionally approved by European Commission under its Foreign Subsidies Regulation regime and by the Austrian Federal Competition Authority under its media merger control regime.

Date Set for Paramount/Warner Bros. Discovery Trial

Warner Bros. logo

U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguin has set a trial date for March 2, 2027 for the antitrust lawsuit regarding Paramount‘s acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. The trial will conclude by March 19.

On July 13, a dozen attorneys general filed a lawsuit to stop the acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery by Paramount Skydance. The lawsuit raised antitrust concerns and a decrease of competition. On July 20, a temporary restraining order was granted that prevented the deal from “closing” or “consummating” or taking any steps that would integrate or consolidate the operations. That temporary restraining order was extended an additional two weeks and then on July 24 Paramount agreed to halt its acquisition while the court case played out, possibly to June 2027.

The delay is a big one because if the deal isn’t completed by September 30, the price increases 25 cents per share per quarter it’s not approved. That would add $627 million to the cost of the overall deal each quarter, or roughly $7 million per day. That means this will increase the cost roughly $1.3 billion if the trial goes the entire time.

Ethics Complaints Raised over FCC Commissioners Gifts from Paramount

Warner Bros. logo

Paramount Skydance‘s attempt to purchase Warner Bros. Discovery has even more stink surrounding it. Two government watchdog groups have requested for an investigation into ethics violations by Federal Communications Commission members. Members accepted luxury gala tickets while Paramount was working to get government approval for its $111 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery.

The Democracy Defenders Fund and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington have cited an investigation by ProPublica about how CBS or its parent company (which is now Paramount) have given tickets to FCC commissioners to the Kennedy Center honors gala. CBS sponsors the event. That gift acceptance included while the Paramount/Warner Bros. deal was going through the government approval process as well as other major business from Paramount, including multiple mergers.

Commissioner Olivia Trusty‘s financial disclosure lists two tickets to the December 2025 gala worth more than $12,000. Trusty voted to approve Paramount’s merger with Skydance.

FCC Chair Brendan Carr‘s financial statements shows he accepted tickets eight times since 2017 which is over $75,000 in gifts. He sat in a private skybox at December’s gala with Paramount’s CEO David Ellison and other Paramount and CBS executives. Carr voted for the Paramount-Skydance merger.

According to ProPublica, seven of the ten commissioners who have served since 2016 accepted tickets with a value of more than $260,000.

Federal ethics rules ban employees from taking gifts from any entity that does business with, is regulated by, or seeks action from the agency.

The Democracy Defenders Fund says that Carr and Trusty broke the rules on accepting gifts or even criminal laws from accepting illegal gratuities. Carr and Trusty should be required to repay Paramount the “fair market value” for their gifts and their annual disclosures should not be certified until they do so. The organization is also requesting Carr to be disqualified from any decision concerning the Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery merger.

Paramount had announced it was making a hostile takeover bid for Warner Bros. Discovery hours after the gala and Carr endorsed the deal three months later.

The Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery deal is on hold while a court case plays out between the company and a dozen attorneys general. The business deal is also facing other litigation as well as unknown decisions from other governments.

Breaking: Paramount Agrees to Halt its Acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery Until June 2027 or Court Rulings are Decided

Warner Bros. logo

In a legal filing, Paramount and state attorneys general have reached an agreement to delay the acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery to June 2027 or earlier if it makes it way through courts and a ruling is made before. The agreement needs to be approved by Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín, who is overseeing the case.

On July 13, a dozen attorneys general filed a lawsuit to stop the acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery by Paramount Skydance. The lawsuit raised antitrust concerns and a decrease of competition. On July 20, a temporary restraining order was granted that prevented the deal from “closing” or “consummating” or taking any steps that would integrate or consolidate the operations. That temporary restraining order was extended an additional two weeks before today’s deal.

The delay throws the entire deal into chaos as it potentially increases the cost to Paramount. For each quarter the deal doesn’t close beginning in October 2026 the cost increases $650 million. If the decision really stretches out until June 2027, that’d increase the cost nearly $2 billion. Paramount has stated that it might have to rework its financing if the price increases and with the volatility in the Ellison’s net-worth due to Oracle stock prices, the deal’s financial situation became far more complicated.

Paramount described the delay as a “significant win” as it will give the company “a direct path to a trial based on the evidence,” a spokeswoman said. “This is the fastest and clearest way to prove that this transaction is good for competition, good for consumers, and good for creators.”

Below is California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s press release regarding the deal:

California Attorney General Rob Bonta today announced securing an agreement with Warner Bros. and Paramount that would keep the entertainment titans from merging until June 1, 2027, or until after a decision by the court on the states’ claims, whichever comes first. If the court finds in favor of the states, the merger would be blocked pending appeal. Last week, Attorney General Bonta led a coalition of 12 attorneys general in filing a lawsuit challenging the unlawful merger, and this week, he celebrated a critical win when he secured a temporary restraining order pausing the merger. The Warner Bros./ Paramount merger is expected to result in higher prices, lower content quality, and fewer movies and TV shows. The proposed $110 billion merger — the largest in Hollywood history — would combine two of Hollywood’s five major film distributors and two of the five major owners of basic cable channels, extinguishing competition between Paramount and Warner Bros., and inflicting substantial harm on movie theaters, basic cable distributors, and ultimately, audiences nationwide. 

“Our argument against this illegal merger is straightforward: When too few corporations have too much power in markets central to American life, it makes things more expensive, and it makes things worse,” said Attorney General Bonta. “Today’s agreement is great news for audiences, movie theaters, and the many people who write, build, and create the art, news, and entertainment so many of us enjoy. We are eager to continue to make our case in court and celebrate another tremendous win in our effort to ensure this unlawful merger never sees the light of day.”

As part of today’s deal, Warner Bros./Paramount agree not to merge until 5 days after a decision on the merits of the states’ challenge or until June 1, 2027, whichever comes earlier. If the court finds in favor of the states, the merger would be blocked pending appeal. If there is no merits determination by June 1, 2027, the states can file a motion for a preliminary injunction.

For more than a century, Warner Bros. and Paramount have stood astride the film and television industry as independent sources of creativity and competition. The lawsuit alleges that the merger violates Section 7 of the Clayton Act, which holds that mergers that may substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly are illegal. The attorneys general allege that, if Warner Bros. and Paramount are allowed to merge, it would lessen competition in three markets: film distribution, anticipated blockbuster film distribution, and licensing cable TV channels.

And the release from the office of Attorney General Letitia James:

Attorney General Letitia James and a coalition of 11 other attorneys general today secured a months-long halt to Paramount Skydance Corp.’s (Paramount) $110 billion takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (Warner Bros.). On July 13, Attorney General James and the coalition sued Paramount and Warner Bros., alleging that their merger would illegally reduce competition throughout the film and television industries, harming workers, consumers, and businesses. Attorney General James and the coalition today secured a stipulation from Paramount and Warner Bros. that will delay the merger until after a court ruling on the merits of the lawsuit or June 1, 2027, whichever is earlier.

“From the workers and artists who bring stories to life to the families who buy tickets at the box office, Paramount’s illegal takeover of Warner Bros. is a bad deal for all those who count on a competitive entertainment industry,” said Attorney General James. “Halting this merger while our case proceeds is a critical victory in our efforts to uphold the law and protect the film and television industries. I look forward to continuing our case to stop this illegal merger.”

On July 20, Attorney General James and the coalition won a temporary restraining order preventing Paramount and Warner Bros. from carrying out their merger. Under the stipulation announced today, Paramount and Warner Bros. will continue to remain separate companies until five days after the court’s decision on the merits of the case or June 1, 2027, whichever comes earlier.

Joining Attorney General James in this case are the attorneys general of Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, and Washington.

For New York, this matter is being handled by Assistant Attorneys General Pratik Agarwal, Morgan Feder, and Will Margrabe and Attorney General Fellow Jaya Mantovani, all of the Antitrust Bureau, under the supervision of Bureau Chief Elinor Hoffmann and Deputy Bureau Chief Amy McFarlane, and with the assistance of Chief Economist Chitra Marti. The Antitrust Bureau is part of the Division for Economic Justice, which is led by Chief Deputy Attorney General Christopher D’Angelo and overseen by First Deputy Attorney General Jennifer Levy.

Restraining Order Against Paramount’s Warner Bros. Discovery Acquisition Extended

Warner Bros. logo

On July 13, a dozen attorneys general filed a lawsuit to stop the acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery by Paramount Skydance. The lawsuit raised antitrust concerns and a decrease of competition. On July 20, a temporary restraining order was granted that prevented the deal from “closing” or “consummating” or taking any steps that would integrate or consolidate the operations.

Now, the judge has extended that restraining order by an additional 14 days, through August 17. The reason is to give the parties in the case more time to set an extended schedule for legal proceedings.

A hearing is currently set for August 3 to address the motion by the states and a preliminary injunction that could outright block the deal.

Paramount, though, has filed a motion for a three-day evidentiary hearing to take place later in August instead of that August 3 motion. They want that format so they can cross-examine the states’ expert witnesses. The states have said it’s an attempt to get around the process and decrease the time for the states to prepare their argument before the court.

The European Commission Approves Paramount’s Acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery with Conditions

Warner Bros. logo

The European Commission has approved Paramount Skydance‘s $111 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. The approval does come with some conditions.

  • Paramount must terminated its stake in a theatrical distribution joint venture with Universal Pictures called United International Pictures. This must be done within 13 months of the closing of the transaction.
  • It can not go into an agreement or understanding with Universal to co-distribute films in the European Union for 10 years.
  • The company can’t move the distribution of Warner Bros. films from their existing distributor to the one used by Paramount where that distributor also distributes Universal’s or Disney’s films in Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Sweden.
  • Paramount won’t shift its distribution of its films to the distributor used by Warner Bros. where that distributor also distributes Universal or Disney films.

The commission felt that there was enough competition for film production in the EU and US including Disney, Universal, Sony, MGM, A24, Lionsgate, and more. It also didn’t think there was issues when it came to the overlap in pay-tv channels, in particular for children.

The deal still has many hurdles to go before it’s completed. United Kingdom’s Competition and Markets Authority must still approve the deal plus there’s multiple lawsuits including one brought by the attorneys general from a dozen states that has led to a temporary restraining order concerning the deal. Paramount has requested a speedy trial and skip a hearing regarding the restraining order.

« Older Entries