Tag Archives: paramount

Writers Guild of America admit Attorneys General Left Them Out to Dry in Paramount Appeasement

An illustration of two arms engaged in a strong arm wrestling match, with the phrases 'Screwing Everyone,' 'Paramount,' 'Skydance,' and 'Democrat Attorneys General' labeled on the arms.

Today, a dozen attorneys general settled with Paramount regarding the company’s $111 billion takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery. The attorneys general received little in return but did try to make it look like they actually got something in return. In July, twelves states and the Writers Guild of America filed antitrust lawsuits in an attempt to stop the merger. The AGs have caved, along with numerous spineless unions, and now the WGA has spoken out in a rather damning statement. We put in bold the big “fuck you” to the AGs involved.

We continue to believe the merger will cause damage to writers and the industry at large. Now that the Attorneys General have settled with Paramount, however, as a nonprofit, the WGA must contend with the reality of forging ahead alone, with no backing from government enforcers, with a complex antitrust lawsuit that would cost millions of dollars to pursue through trial. Consequently, we have also settled our lawsuit with an agreement from Paramount to prohibit writer layoffs at CBS News Broadcast for 5 years, and to pay $17.5 million to our health fund along with our attorneys’ fees in the litigation.

Though we were not successful in blocking the merger, our advocacy brought more attention to the harms that this merger—and others like it—will cause. We will continue to fight the harms of industry consolidation.

As the number of outlets to sell our work to and the corresponding diversity of programming shrinks, we need industry-wide structural separation between streamers and studios in order to promote competition in programming, like the Financial Interest and Syndication Rules once required in broadcast television. We will continue to fight for these goals.

The merger is expected to cost 10s of thousands of jobs as well as negatively impact economies. Congrats attorneys general and Democrats for throwing the WGA under the bus! That’s how you continue to build support!

Details of the Paramount/Attorneys General Settlement Revealed

California AG Bonta waving the white flag

California Attorney General Bonta and eleven other Democratic Attorneys General are celebrating their waving the white flag in their caving and settling with Paramount regarding its $111 billion takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery.

They’re actually celebrating a WHOLE FIVE YEAR court enforceable commitment of $1.5 billion to bolster film production and a $47.5 million fund for workers impacted by the merger as well as restrictions on how the company handles cable negotiations to help keep prices competitive.. That’s a whopping $300 million a year! Paramount has said it will save $6 BILLION a year in staffing reductions alone… that’ $47.5 million is all of 0.79% of their savings… The deal to purchase Warner Bros. Discovery is $111 billion. This commitment is a whole 1.3% of that and that’s over 5 years. It’s a sliver of Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount’s profits.

It wasn’t just a dozen attorneys general that showed their inability to play hardball. They were joined by IATSE International President Matthew D. Loeb, Directors Guild of America National Executive Director Russell Hollander, iUNA! Local 724 Business Manager Alex Aguilar Jr., International Brotherhood of Teamsters General President President Sean M. O’Brien, and Sean Astin, President of SAG-AFTRA and Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, National Executive Director and Chief Negotiator of SAG-AFTRA.

The deal also includes:

  • 30 films a year — including 20 wide releases — in the first two years.
  • 32 films a year — with 21 wide releases — in years three, four, and five.
  • Paramount commits to release at least four independent films in each year of the commitment period.

To put this in perspective.

In 2024, Warner Bros. released 12 films in the top 200 and Paramount release 9 films for a total of 21. In 2025, Warner Bros. released 11 films in the top 200 domestic gross and Paramount released 12 for a total of 23. 2026 has 10 films by Paramount so far and 9 from Warner Bros. with another 11 still to come, currently, before the end of the year. That’s a total of 30 in 2026, so the commitment of 20 wide release films is a DECREASE from 2026 with 30 the same. There’s already 18 Warner Bros. and 12 Paramount films announced for 2027, that’s a total of 30, so their commitment is already met. 2028 already has 10 announced Warner Bros. films and 9 from Paramount, 19 of the 21 wide releases. Those numbers don’t include Warner Bros. or Paramount’s direct to video or streaming releases. The bump touted in perspective isn’t that much and has no protections after five years. To say this is a whole lot of nothing to make it seem like something is an understatement and shows how little those negotiating either understood the assignment or cared.

If Paramount fails to meet this film output requirement in any year, the company will be required to divest Miramax Studios and must pay $30 million per missed film toward the healthcare and retirement trust funds associated with the Writers Guild of America (WGA), International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees (IATSE), Directors Guild of America (DGA), International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT) and other unions, and to the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) for more antitrust enforcement.

Domestic Production: The $1.5 billion investment over five years also has a kicker if the company gets a U.S. federal film tax credit of at least 20%, the U.S. production would need to be increased to 20% for years one and two and 30% for the next three years from the current 5%. If a film tax credit is passed in California or New York, production investment would need to be increased to 40% of all film production being in the U.S.

California Attorney General Bonta has committed to kissing Paramount’s ass further to uncap California’s Film and Television Tax Credit.

Independent Film Fund: The company will form a fund with annual contributions of $5 million per year, for a total of $25 million. We have no doubt that money will then be siphoned into projects Paramount/Warner Bros. Discovery are involved in. It’ll be a net gain of zero.

Protection for Workers: The merged company will commit to $47.5 million in a Workforce Fund over five years for training and career development for workers fired by the merger. Paramount has stated they will have a savings of $6 billion through staff reductions alone. Workers are fucked in this one.

Cable Agreements: For five years, the negotiations for Paramount’s basic cable channels and Warner Bros. basic cable channels must be conducted independently. After five years, expect your cable rates to skyrocket or channels getting pulled. Consumers are fucked in this one.

Ongoing Monitoring: The company also agreed to appointment of an independent monitor to oversee its compliance with this agreement. We’re sure Trump and the Ellison’s friends will be taking part (or other ass-kissing individuals).

It has been reported that the board to oversee monitoring would be established within 180 days of closing, feature five individuals (established journalists active or retired with 10 years experience) and those individuals will be appointed by the company’s board of directors and feature “no more than two” “affiliated” with the same political party. If you can’t see the loopholes there and how toothless that’ll be, we don’t know what to tell you. The panel will resolves disputes over “alleged reporting bias or failure to meet agreed reporting fairness standards” as well as monitor editorial independence including from the ownership and shareholders. CNN’s already dwindling stature is getting double tapped with the buyout and then this.

This terrible deal has been blessed by lead Attorney General Bonta and the attorneys general of Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Washington.

The protection for consumers and workers and minimal and this was all about caving to Paramount’s threats in an election year.

Word came out over the weekend that while Bonta wanted to settled, the AGs of New York, Connecticut, Minnesota, and Nevada were hold outs but eventually came around late Sunday. Bonta “assured them” he’d hold Paramount’s “feet to the fire” that the company stuck to its commitments. those commitments that have been leaked are all job related and have nothing to protect the company from lurching CNN right and playing propaganda for the Trump administration like it has for CBS. David Ellison’s father Larry Ellison is part of a group that has invested in TikTok, a major source of news for younger individuals. Larry Ellison is a friend of Donald Trump, even having been in meetings regarding the January insurrection by Trump. As part of the deal to purchase Paramount, the Ellison’s Skydance pledged to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs and establish a CBS News ombudsman position to review bias complaints. Paramount has come under scrutiny for its takeover of CBS News removing its editorial independence for a more right-wing bent calling into question is history of quality journalism. Paramount owner David Ellison appointed Bari Weiss as the head of the news service as well as a conservative to act as its ombudsman, an “internal advocate for journalistic integrity and transparency.” That move by Ellison has tanked ratings for CBS News and 60 Minutes so there’s a chance that he may think about doing the same for CNN.

California Governor Gavin Newsom has been pushing for a settlement as he still attempts to run for President in 2028. This should kill any chance he had of that, which was slim to start. His advocating for it again sides him with billionaire oligarchs and big business instead of the general American public. He again shows he’s a Republican wolf in Democratic sheep clothing. There’s a chance it kills Bonta’s future, though he’s likely hitching it to Newsom hoping to land a role in his never going to happen Presidency. The other AGs will be facing questions about their approval of the deal and how they can claim they’re pro-consumer or pro-worker protections.

Paramount needed the deal to be completed as soon as possible as the cost of it would begin to increase by $7 million a day if not closed by September 30. With the projected lawsuit from the AGs starting in March 2027, it’d have added about $1.3 billion to Paramount’s cost.

Paramount also was facing the changing tide in American politics. While the Presidency, House, and Senate are currently favorable to them, it’s likely the Democrats will take the House and Senate in November. While it’s unlikely they’d find a spine to stop the deal, the chance greatly increases if they were to.

The Warner Bros. Discovery deal also puts Paramount into massive debt with 49.5% equity take by Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Qatar, each of them facing issues due to the current war in Iran. Add in the volatile wealth of David Ellison and his father Larry Ellison, founder of Oracle who is also funding the deal. Paramount will likely at some point have to sell assets to pay down debt.

Remember, vote Blue No Matter to gain further appeasement and lack of accountability for oligarchs!

AGs Cave to Paramount Putting the Final Nail in Antitrust Protection

A coach in a white shirt with a whistle stands in a gymnasium, animatedly expressing the phrase 'Dollar, dollar bills ya'll'.

Hope that a dozen Democratic Attorneys General had spines were dashed this Monday as word has spread they have caved and settled with Paramount in the company’s move to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery. While full details have yet to be released, the initial details shows the settlement and focus was only on jobs, not protecting consumers or the media.

A lawsuit was launched by a dozen states to try to stop, or get consolidations, in Paramount’s purchase of Warner Bros. Discovery for $111 billion. The deal would consolidate the media further giving Paramount control over CNN along with Warner Bros.’ massive television and movie catalogue, HBO, HBO Max, DC Comics, and more. The states were joined by the Writers Guild of America.

Paramount played California and its Attorney General Rob Bonta perfectly, threatening to leave the state, threatening to cost it jobs and money, in an election year. The merger itself will cost the state money as well as jobs. It’s damned if you do and damned if you don’t situation. Paramount also was demanding a $1.88 billion bond from the states and WGA to cover possible damages if the case went to trial which was set for March 2027.

Word came out over the weekend that while Bonta wanted to settled, the AGs of New York, Connecticut, Minnesota, and Nevada were hold outs but eventually came around late Sunday. Bonta “assured them” he’d hold Paramount’s “feet to the fire” that the company stuck to its commitments. those commitments that have been leaked are all job related and have nothing to protect the company from lurching CNN right and playing propaganda for the Trump administration like it has for CBS. David Ellison’s father Larry Ellison is part of a group that has invested in TikTok, a major source of news for younger individuals. Larry Ellison is a friend of Donald Trump, even having been in meetings regarding the January insurrection by Trump. As part of the deal to purchase Paramount, the Ellison’s Skydance pledged to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs and establish a CBS News ombudsman position to review bias complaints. Paramount has come under scrutiny for its takeover of CBS News removing its editorial independence for a more right-wing bent calling into question is history of quality journalism. Paramount owner David Ellison appointed Bari Weiss as the head of the news service as well as a conservative to act as its ombudsman, an “internal advocate for journalistic integrity and transparency.” That move by Ellison has tanked ratings for CBS News and 60 Minutes so there’s a chance that he may think about doing the same for CNN.

California Governor Gavin Newsom has been pushing for a settlement as he still attempts to run for President in 2028. This should kill any chance he had of that, which was slim to start. His advocating for it again sides him with billionaire oligarchs and big business instead of the general American public. He again shows he’s a Republican wolf in Democratic sheep clothing. There’s a chance it kills Bonta’s future and the other AGs will be facing questions about their approval.

Paramount needed the deal to be completed as soon as possible as the cost of it would begin to increase by $7 million a day if not closed by September 30. With the projected lawsuit from the AGs starting in March 2027, it’d have added about $1.3 billion to Paramount’s cost.

Paramount also was facing the changing tide in American politics. While the Presidency, House, and Senate are currently favorable to them, it’s likely the Democrats will take the House and Senate in November. While it’s unlikely they’d find a spine to stop the deal, the chance greatly increases if they were to.

The deal, which will reportedly be revealed this Monday, involves an investment of $1.5 billion for home-grown film production and protecting and creating jobs, requirements for additional production if the federal government approves tax incentives, and a $47.5 million workforce development fund and to honor existing collective bargaining agreements. Paramount grossed $28.75 billion in 2025 and Warner Bros Discovery annual gross profit for 2025 was $16.411 billion. The amount of money mentioned is nothing for the mega company and likely would include money already going to be spent in domestic production anyways.

Paramount has stated they project $6 billion in cost savings when pitching investors, which is expected to be through significant layoffs.

The deal also puts Paramount into massive debt with 49.5% equity take by Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Qatar, each of them facing issues due to the current war in Iran. Add in the volatile wealth of David Ellison and his father Larry Ellison, founder of Oracle who is also funding the deal. Paramount will likely at some point have to sell assets to pay down debt.

We’ll have more details when they’re officially released.

Trump’s DoJ Supports his Buddy David Ellison’s Bond Demand in its Antitrust Fight with States

Warner Bros. logo

The Ellison’s support of Donald Trump keeps paying off as the Department of Justice, under President Trump, have filed to support David Ellison and Paramount‘s demand for a $1.88 billion bond from a dozen states and the Writers Guild of America in the antitrust lawsuit currently going on over Paramount’s attempt to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery. On August 17, Paramount requested the bond, a federal law protects mergers and acquisition parties from “potential harm” from halting the deal for litigation.

In July, a dozen states, as well as the Writers Guild of America, sued Paramount citing antitrust concerns to stop the $111 billion deal to take over Warner Bros. Discovery. With the trial set to take place in March 2027, the deal will be delayed with a cost increase, “ticking fee,” for Paramount Skydance to complete its purchase. The price increases 25 cents per share per quarter after September 30 it’s not approved. That would add $627 million each quarter, or roughly $7 million per day and if the court case’s timeline remains what has been proposed, it’ll add about $1.3 billion to the $111 billion cost. Paramount’s bond request is an attempt to recover that increased cost. The bond would cover potential damages if the preliminary injunction under federal antitrust law is overturned.

Paramount had agreed to freeze its acquisition until the trial is completed or June 2027, whichever comes first, before filing the bond request.

Paramount and State Attorneys General set New Settlement Talks for October

A warning graphic featuring a skull and crossbones, with the text 'warning antitrust settlement talks occurring' in bold white letters on a black background.

In late August, Paramount and State Attorneys General were set to meet to discuss a settlement regarding Paramount’s acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. That meeting was canceled due to a “lack of good faith” by Paramount. California Attorney General Rob Bonta accused Paramount of breaking confidentiality and misrepresenting the discussions.

The judge in the case has instructed the parties to sit down for two consecutive days at the end of October. To prevent it from being a waste of time, the parties will submit a schedule to the judge by the end of September 15. The request to meet is pretty standard in cases and doesn’t indicate the parties are close to a settlement or it’s even in progress.

A dozen state attorneys general are suing Paramount to prevent, or get changes, to Paramount’s $111 billion purchase of Warner Bros. Discovery. The states believe that the deal violates antitrust laws and will be negative to consumers and those within the entertainment industry.

The Halloween-ish meeting is one of major dates coming up for the case.

The Supreme Court has asked the attorneys general to respond to a push by two Republican attorneys general to get the Supreme Court to stop the lawsuit. They have to respond that lawsuit by September 25.

A hearing is set regarding a $1.88 billion bond that Paramount is demanding from the states and Writers Guild of America over damage they’ll suffer due to delays of the deal.

At the end of September, a $7 million a day ticking fee for Paramount’s deal begins. That fee is why Paramount is demanding the bond from the parties suing them. The ticking fee will add $635 million a quarter to the deal and currently, the court date for the antitrust case is set for March 2027 which would add about $1.3 billion to the cost of the deal.

Republican Attorneys General from Iowa and Montana ask the Supreme Court to Intervene in the Antitrust Case Against Paramount

Two attorneys general are stepping in hoping to help Paramount in its takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery. Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird and Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen have filed a motion with the Supreme Court naming the dozen states suing Paramount as defendants. They are hoping the Supreme Court will step in and stop the lawsuit by a dozen states against Paramount over its takeover. Those dozen states have raised antitrust concerns.

Plaintiffs, the State of Iowa and State of Montana, respectfully move this Court for leave to file the attached Bill of Complaint to stop a politicized enforcement action that seeks to block the Paramount-Warner Bros. merger.

Twelve states have effectively vetoed a transaction that the other thirty-eight, and the United States, declined to challenge

No other forum can resolve that controversy. Congress made this Court’s jurisdiction over controversies between two or more states exclusive. … This Court is not merely the best forum for this controversy. It is the only one.

How the Supreme Court might act is up in the air. The right-wing court has sided heavily with corporations in decisions but this is an inter-state dispute and while they are the court for issues over boundary and water rights, as examples, it’s not clear if this falls under their jurisdiction.

Iowa and Montana claim they have no other venue to sue the states involved in the antitrust lawsuit. While Iowa and Montana are claiming the dozen states have veto power, the deal isn’t canceled, just delayed, until a court’s decision or Paramount’s agreed upon pause sunset of June 1, 2027.

The two attorneys general claim the lawsuit will have an impact on Iowa and Montana’s economies, “especially the tens of thousands of employees of Paramount and Warner Bros., as well as hundreds of millions who watch their movies, shows, and news through a variety of sources. Iowans and Montanans are being deprived of the benefits of the deal that DOJ and their own state attorneys general approved.”

The antitrust lawsuit does not prevent movies or television shows from being produced, worked on, or released, so the harm is dubious at best. In fact, a report shows the harm the merger would cause if it were to go through with the loss of jobs and more.

The two states go further in their filing:

This case is about the legal limits on politicized antitrust enforcement by a small handful of states seeking to enjoin a $110 billion merger that the United States, most American states, and competition regulators worldwide have cleared. Plaintiff States have the same interest that Defendant States have in well-functioning markets, but believe the merger will help their economies. Because they have the same interest, they should be able to litigate the issue, but can only do so here.

The approval process in the United States is dubious at best, as reports have come out that staff was ready to recommend the merger be challenged, not approved, but were ignored by decision makers higher up in the government. Paramount CEO David Ellison is a friend, and many consider an ally, of President Donald Trump.

The states have requested setting defendant states’ deadline to respond for Sept. 15, 2026, and distributing the case for an Oct. 9 conference.

Paramount is attempting to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery for about $110.8 billion. They have agreed to delay the closing of the deal until as late as June 2027 or whenever the antitrust trial might end as part of the lawsuit after being sued by a dozen states which began in July 2026. That trial is set for March 2, 2027.

You can read the filing from Iowa and Montana below:

Loading Viewer…

Paramount Meeting with Attorneys General Canceled Due to “Lack of Good Faith”

ace attorney canceled

Late last week, news broke that Paramount would have a meeting this Monday with the Attorneys General suing them to stop the acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery over antitrust concerns. The meeting was ordered by the judge and an attempt at mediation before the trial which begins March 2027. That meeting has now been canceled according to California Attorney General Rob Bonta citing a “lack of good faith” in the settlement talks.

In a statement, Bonta said:

My office had a meeting with Paramount on Friday. Paramount did not maintain the confidentiality of that meeting. Not only did Paramount leak the alleged substance of settlement discussions, but they misrepresented these discussions, demonstrating a lack of good faith.

As soon as Paramount stops playing games and engages sincerely, my office is happy to meet again.

Bonta is leading the dozen attorneys general who have banded together in the lawsuit.

Paramount is attempting to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery for about $110.8 billion. They have agreed to delay the closing of the deal until as late as June 2027 as part of the lawsuit.

Bonta has previously accused Paramount of playing games with their threat to move their company out of California as well as its attempt at a $1.88 billion bond from the dozen states as well as the Writers Guild of America which is also suing.

Paramount and State AGs to Have Settlement Talks Next Week and Gavin Newsom Responds to Threats of Paramount Leaving California

The trial between a dozen state Attorneys General and Paramount over its attempt to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery doesn’t begin until March 2, 2027, but the parties will meet next week to discuss a settlement. After approval from the Trump administration and numerous other countries, a dozen Attorneys General sued Paramount in July in attempt to stop its acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery for $110.8 billion. Antitrust concerns were raised by the deal which would shrink film and television distributors, have paramount control another major news source in CNN, among other issues.

Representatives from Paramount and the offices of the Attorneys General will meet on Monday to discuss the case. The meeting though is mandated under the mediation procedure, so don’t read too much into it. It’s a common step and has been mandated by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta said about the meeting:

As I’ve said before, generally for all of my cases, I prefer to resolve disputes in the boardroom, not the courtroom. As I’ve also said, if the opposing party in litigation wants to meet in good faith to make a sincere effort to resolve the case, we’ll meet. And as I have further said, any potential discussions about the Paramount-Warner Brothers merger will be unproductive absent robust structural remedies on the table that address our concerns.

As it stands today, the proposed Warner Bros./Paramount merger will mean higher costs, less competition, lower wages, job cuts, and fewer movies and TV shows. This merger violates long-standing federal antitrust law, and we are committed to enforcing the law.

Paramount has stated they’re willing to work towards and negotiate a solution without a trial and there has been calls from other parties, some unions and theater chains, for the parties to negotiate a settlement.

Paramount has also threatened to leave California over the lawsuit, a move Bonta sees as an attempt to put pressure on the AGs and get them to settle.

Paramount needs the settlement more than the AGs. If the deal isn’t closed by September 30, a ticking fee begins at about $7 million a day, increasing the cost of the deal. The trial has been set for March 2, 2027 and will last 17 days. The delay through the trial, about 169 days, will cost the company $1.15 billion. Paramount is currently seeking a bond of $1.88 billion from the AGs as well as the Writers Guild of America who is also suing. A decision on that won’t happen until late September

Current California Governor Gavin Newsom has said he is taking Paramount’s threat to leave the state “seriously” and hopes it doesn’t happen.

And I’m of the belief they don’t want that to happen. It’s not, I don’t think, in the company’s long-term interest, but I take it seriously.

I’m concerned about the state, our reputation.

Newsom has also teased there are discussions between parties already happening regarding the antitrust lawsuit. Newsom isn’t running again for Governor due to term limits, and his time in the position will end in January 2027, months before the trial is set to begin.

Newsom is teasing a running for President in 2028. When he does, he’ll need/look for the support of Ari Emanuel, the CEO of WME Group and CEO and executive chairman of TKO Holdings, for that run. Emanuel has become a kingmaker in politics wielding a lot of influence in both parties, though it is rumored Ari’s brother Rahm is also thinking of running for President. Importantly for this, Emanuel is an ally of Paramount CEO David Ellison and has penned an op-ed in support of the deal. Those opposed to the deal would likely have a more difficult time getting his support for their political ambitions.

Los Angeles projected to lose 4,500 local positions and $4.06 billion in business due to Paramount/Warner Bros. Discovery Deal

The Department of Economic Opportunity for Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Film Office has released a report on its projection of the losses for the city if Paramount succeeds in its acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery.

An initial 60 day report stated “a potential loss of 15,567 corporate roles that overlap across both companies, with 6,099
shared, and 2,495 jobs specifically in Los Angeles County.”

The 120-day final report has been released and highlights risks to numerous groups such as “regulators, workers, investors, and state and local governments” if the merger succeeds.

For Los Angeles County specifically, the final report projects:

  • If the merger goes through, about 4,500 film and TV jobs in Los Angeles County could be lost over the three-year period when the companies combine operations.
  • In total, 10,360 job years could be at risk, including:
    • 2,661 indirect jobs at small businesses that support production — such as prop houses, printers, transportation companies, and other vendors.
    • 3,204 induced jobs that exist because film and TV workers spend money in the local economy — including restaurants, retailers, and service providers.

The economic impact of losing these jobs is significant. At stake:

  • $1.26 billion in wages
  • $2.78 billion in economic value
  • $4.06 billion in total business output
  • $547 million in tax revenue, including $78.6 million in local taxes — most of which (63%) comes from property taxes.

The report raises the concern that job losses would occur through:

  • Slate consolidation (fewer buyers = fewer greenlights) – There would be fewer unscripted/talk shows and related opportunities for Los Angeles-based crews.
  • Talent deals at risk – There’s 895 creators with exclusive deals between the two companies. If there’s less development, work would be lost.
  • Location decisions shifting production away – The new post-merger company would likely shift production away from Los Angeles.
  • Cost of living and Tax Credit Incentives Pressure – LA County and California has a high cost of living and there’s increased competition to court productions through tax credit incentives.

Currently, a dozen attorneys general are fighting the merger between Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery in an antitrust lawsuit along with a lawsuit by the Writers Guild of America. This report is sure to add fuel to the fire and help the fight to try and prevent the deal to go through.

You can read the full report below.

Loading Viewer…

Paramount $1.88 Billion Bond Request Won’t be Decided until Late September

Just a few days ago, Paramount requested 12 states and the Writers Guild of America post a $1.88 billion bond in their antitrust lawsuits. The lawsuits have halted a $110.8 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery by Paramount. A federal law protects mergers and acquisition parties from “potential harm” from halting the deal for litigation.

Paramount is trying to get the states and Writers Guild of America to pay for the timer portion of their proposed deal that would increase the cost by about $7 million per day if it doesn’t close before September 30. As of now, that doesn’t look like it’ll happen. Paramount agreed to halt the deal until their lawsuit with a dozen attorneys general is over or June 1, 2027. A trial is set for March 2, 2027 and believed to last 17 days. The delay through the trial, about 169 days, will cost the company about $1.15 billion.

But, a court decision about that bond will cut it close to when that ticking fee begins in the Paramount/WBD deal. Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin has decided that nothing will be decided in Paramount’s move until September 24. That’s just a week before the the fee would begin and the costs begin to increase.

« Older Entries