Tag Archives: bankruptcy

Sparkle Pop submits Memorandum of Law Dropping Details of the Consigned Goods Negotiations

A hearing has been set for October 6 focused on the potential compromise between (old) Diamond and its trustee Morgan W. Fisher and 15 publishers regarding the fate of consigned goods in possession of (old) Diamond and the warehouse of Sparkle Pop. While (old) Diamond, Fisher, and the publishers are in favor of the deal, lending bank JPMorgan Chase submitted a filing with a “reservation of rights” while Sparkle Pop submitted a filing objecting to the compromise. Now, Sparkle Pop has submitted a “memorandum of law” going into details about the negotiation over the consigned goods.

Here’s how things break down with the Sparkle Pop’s key points as well as revelations of the behind the scenes negotiations.

Inspection of Sparkle Pop’s Distribution Facility

Part of Sparkle Pop’s objection is the call for inspections of Sparkle Pop’s distribution facility which it calls “highly intrusive.” Publishers have filed a motion to get Sparkle Pop to open up the facility to inspect what remains and get a better account of what remains. There’s a belief that Sparkle Pop has sold more consigned goods than is known and that money would be owed for that.

Sparkle Pop believes the inspection is a fishing expedition to get more information to be used in what it calls “baseless and hypothetical claims” that would be brought against Sparkle Pop.

There has been hints at negotiations between the publishers, (old) Diamond, Fisher, and apparently Sparkle Pop. But, Sparkle Pop in their objection stated they were a part of the settlement agreement. Directly from their objection filing with the key part in bold:

If this Court were to approve the proposed settlement (negotiated without Sparkle Pop’s involvement and which wholly discounts Sparkle Pop’s interests), Sparkle Pop would not only have to relinquish its interests in the registry and escrow…

But, in this latest filing, Sparkle Pop says they were part of the negotiations:

The parties engaged in meet-and-confer discussions by email over the course of a week, during which Sparkle Pop made multiple unilateral concessions and provided supporting data. After the last round of Sparkle Pop’s concessions, however, when Sparkle Pop believed that the parties were negotiating in good faith towards a resolution, counsel for the Third-Party Plaintiffs abruptly terminated discussions without further explanation and brought this Motion.

But, this can be true as well, Sparkle Pop provided data and info but wasn’t part of direct negotiations. They also could have been involved at one point and it was determined they were being an obstacle to getting things settled as well. All of this is sure to come out at some point.

What has come out is that Sparkle Pop wanted publishers to pay for the inspection. In this latest filing, Sparkle Pop states they first proposed a fee of $1,000 per hour to “defray costs Sparkle Pop expected to incur” during the inspection as well as wanting the plaintiffs (publishers) to pay the rent and processing fees that Sparkle Pop claims it is owed. Sparkle Pop then reduced the proposed fee to $639.94 per hour and dropped the rent request entirely.

Sparkle pop then proposed:

  1. The inspection would be carried out by Debtor’s former warehouse manager, Shawn Hamrick, with the assistance of persons designation by the Third-Party Plaintiffs, as preapproved by Sparkle Pop;
  2. The Third-Party Plaintiffs to pay Sparkle Pop $639.94 per hour, to defray the significant costs Sparkle Pop would incur in connection with the inspection.
  3. The inventory count for the inspection shall be a basic cycle count (i.e., a general inventory count by carton),
  4. The inspection shall be completed no later than 10 business days from commencement of the inspection, shall be no more than one, 8-hour shift per day, and shall be conducted only after business hours or 5:00 p.m. Central Time.
  5. Sparkle Pop shall not be required to stage the Consigned Inventory for the inspection,
  6. No materials shall be removed from the Warehouse during the inspection, which would be strictly limited to Third-Party Plaintiff s consigned inventory, identified by location numbers.

Sparkle Pop claims they expect to incur a cost of $770.32 per hour for the inspection and include that logic in an exhibit you can read below.

According the Sparkle Pop, the publishers agreed to points 3 through 6 with “certain qualifications.” There was an objection to the first two points over what they saw as “unilateral control” over the inspector and there was no compromise candidate proposed. The second point was just rejected.

Sparkle Pop says the inspection is far more complicated than providing documents and that relevance needs to be proved because of that.

Who Owns the Stock?

Sparkle Pop continues to focus on the fact that who actually “owns” the consigned goods is still up for dispute. There’s over 30 lawsuits submitted by (old) Diamond against publishers in an attempt to resolve that question and that has yet to be decided upon and might not due to the compromise over the goods. In it, (old) Diamond gives ups its claims, which brings us to…

If There’s a Settlement, Do We Need the Inspection?

It feels like there’s some circular logic in this point. The publishers will need to pack and ship the goods as part of the settlement, but wouldn’t they need to know what’s there to ship? Sparkle Pop doesn’t seem to think so stating that the settlement is out there and that the consignors own the goods (which also seems to be odd to state since Sparkle Pop asked who owns it?), claims in cases go to the consignors, and Diamond abandons claims on the consigned goods.

Though Sparkle Pop objected to the settlement, they state they’re not against Diamond abandoning its claims:

Although Sparkle Pop has filed an objection to the motion to approve this settlement, it has not objected (and does not object) to the Trustee’s abandonment of the Estate’s claims to the Stock.

Sparkle Pop has issues with all of those cases between (old) Diamond and the publishers settled and then the publishers using the ongoing cases to try to get an inspection.

Because there is no remaining dispute as to the ownership of the Stock, the underlying adversary proceedings are effectively defunct, and if the proposed settlement between the consignors and the Trustee is approved, they will be entirely rendered moot. Under these circumstances, it is improper for the Third-Party Plaintiffs to simultaneously petition this Court to approve a settlement that resolves the adversary proceedings in their favor, while also invoking these same proceedings as the ostensible basis for seeking a highly intrusive physical inspection of Sparkle Pop’s premises.

Have they just asked for an updated inventory?

While publishers hint that they’ve asked for an update on inventory, Sparkle Pop says they haven’t. A “less intrusive” method than an inspection would be for them to ask the court to force Sparkle Pop to update the inventory list.


You can read all of the filings below:

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

Hearing is set for October over Diamond’s Consignment Goods Compromise

It’s been an interesting month when it comes to (old) Diamond Comic Distributor‘s chapter 7 case. After a year of fighting, Diamond and its trustee Morgan W. Fisher came to a compromise with 15 publishers regarding consigned goods.

Diamond was the major distributor for the comic and tabletop game industry and some of the items it sold were on consignment. Diamond declared chapter 11 and a fight began over those goods with Diamond claiming ownership and wanting to sell them to help pay back its debts. Publishers of course wanted their goods back. It’s been a back and forth in the court over who has a right to the goods. Add in Sparkle Pop, the company that bought some of Diamond’s assets, was storing the goods in the warehouse they took over from Diamond and the new distributor sold some of the stock without permission from Diamond or the publishers.

In early August it was announced that Diamond, Fisher, and 15 publishers came to an agreement that would allow the publishers to get back their goods while Diamond would keep most of the money of the consigned goods sold during the dispute (it’s a bit more complicated but that’s the general compromise).

Lending bank JPMorgan Chase submitting a filing with a “reservation of rights” while Sparkle Pop submitted a filing objecting to the compromise.

Now, the court will take up the motion, response, and objection in a hearing set for October 6.

Notice of Hearing (related document(s)[1309] Application to Compromise Controversy filed by Trustee Morgan W. Fisher, [1328] Response filed by Creditor JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., [1331] Objection filed by Interested Party Sparkle Pop LLC). Hearing scheduled for 10/6/2026 at 10:00 AM. In person hearing Courtroom 9-D Baltimore, Judge Rice. (Scott, Cherita)

Motion Limiting Notifications in the Diamond Chapter 7 Case Approved

In early August, Diamond trustee Morgan W. Fisher filed a motion to limit future notices regarding the case. The motion was interesting as it laid out a lot of information in the case that reminds us of the scope of the situation.

  • Diamond’s credit matrix initially consisted of almost 1,300 parties and when subscription comic book customers was added it was over 1,500.
  • 75 claims were filed for the Chapter 7 with the highest amount being Dynamic forces with $29,514,087.40 to $182 from Irish Holdings.
  • Omni Agent Solutions logged 742 claims in the main case and 71 claims concerning Diamond Select Toys
  • There were 759 unique claimants, 28 were governmental agencies.

Fisher motion raised the difficulty and cost in notifying everyone every update about the case and there’s numerous other ways to get notifications like a Notice of Appearance and Request for Notices.

Going forward, notices would go out to:

  • Counsel for the Debtor;
  • The Trustee and his counsel;
  • Secured Creditors;
  • The Debtor’s 20 largest unsecured creditors, based on filed claims;
  • The Office of the United States Trustee;
  • The Internal Revenue Service, and the Comptroller of the State of Maryland;
  • Persons who have appeared or filed a notice of appearance and request for service in the case (including persons served via CM/ECF);
  • Parties who are directly affected by a particular motion, paper or pleading.

The 20 largest creditors are:

  • Hasbro, Inc.: $1,185,638.23
  • Dynamic Forces, Inc.: $29,514,087.40
  • Alliance Entertainment, LLC: $10,008,534.05
  • Bandai Limited: $9,245,465.10
  • Penguin Random House LLC: $8,941,467.05
  • Passage Trading: $6,297,244.00
  • Oni-Lion Forge Publishing Group: $5,646,907.40
  • Udon Entertainment Inc.: $4,327,716.06
  • Valiant Entertainment LLC: $4,070,588.30
  • Disney Consumer Products, Inc.: $3,638,592.00
  • Creative Grand Industrial HK Limited: $2,960,931.87
  • Zenescope Entertainment, Inc.: $2,360,907.16
  • Fantagraphics Books Inc.: $2,279,330.68
  • MegaHouse Corporation: $2,150,730.00
  • Magnetic Press LLC: $1,957,576.53
  • TMP International, LLC: $1,774,558.48
  • Aftershock Comics, LLC: $1,767,573.53
  • ARA, Inc.: $1,229,027.36
  • Funko, LLC: $1,206,854.62
  • Action Figure Authority Inc.: $1,200,000.00

Today, Fisher’s motion has been approved and the Trustee will file a Consolidated Master Service List updated from time to time to add persons other than those receiving service by CM/ECF and the ability to pay/reimburse the costs for notices served is approved going forward. Fisher won’t have to ask permission each time.

Of course, no need to worry about being notified as Graphic Policy is here to bring you all of the latest news!

Loading Viewer…

Sparkle Pop is Given Even More Time to Do Their Homework and Respond to Diamond’s Settlement with Publishers

In August, Diamond and its Trustee Morgan W. Fisher settled with fifteen publishers regarding goods still held by Diamond during its chapter 7/chapter 11 process. The deal allowed the publisher to pay for packing and shipping to get their product back and some money would be paid out to them.

An impacted party regarding this is Sparkle Pop which purchased some of Diamond’s assets and now manages the warehouse the consigned goods are located.

Earlier this week, Sparkle Pop was given until August 28, 2026 to respond to the settlement. Now, they get another extension and will have until August 31, 2026 to respond.

Loading Viewer…

JPMorgan submits a “Reservation of Rights” in Response to the Settlement Between Diamond and some Publishers

In early August, Diamond and its trustee Morgan W. Fisher and 15 publishers announced a settlement regarding consigned goods being held by Diamond and warehoused by Sparkle Pop. To catch folks up, when Diamond declared bankruptcy, it held a large quantity of product in its warehouse that was on consignment. After some time, Diamond claimed it had a right to sell the consigned goods to help pay down its debt and that nothing would go to the publishers. The publishers claimed it was their property and that when Diamond declared bankruptcy it triggered a whole bunch of different things that would allow them to get their product back. This has gone on for about a year and a half that resulted in all sorts of off-shoot lawsuits and a lot of behind-the-scenes negotiations.

As part of the settlement, the 15 publishers can get their goods back and have to pay for the picking and packing of the inventory. There’s also a small monetary payout to the publishers while (old) Diamond and its trustee gets a windfall of money for consignment goods sold while all of this process played out.

That agreement has to be approved by various parties, including JPMorgan Chase Bank which has loaned (old) Diamond a considerable amount of money so it could function and go through the bankruptcy process. JPMorgan in their filing reiterates it wants to get paid, and should be one of the first to get paid when that time comes.

In the filing, it states that JPMorgan has an “allowed claim in an amount not less than $6,541,667.19.” That total doesn’t include the interest, costs, and attorneys’ fees that continue as long as this process plays out.

But, basically, the bank punts allowing it to speak up at a future date regarding the issue.

WHEREFORE, Lender expressly reserves the right to (a) raise any objection it may have with respect to the terms of the proposed Joint Motion, and (b) to be heard before the Court with respect to the entry of any order approving the Joint Motion and to raise additional arguments or objections in connection therewith.

You can read the filing below:

Loading Viewer…

Sparkle Pop is Given More Time to Respond to Diamond’s Settlement with Publishers

In August, Diamond and its Trustee Morgan W. Fisher settled with fifteen publishers regarding goods still held by Diamond during its chapter 7/chapter 11 process. The deal allowed the publisher to pay for packing and shipping to get their product back and some money would be paid out to them.

An impacted party regarding this is Sparkle Pop which purchased some of Diamond’s assets and now manages the warehouse the consigned goods are located.

Sparkle Pop will now have until August 28, 2026 to respond to the settlement.

Loading Viewer…

Diamond Trustee Morgan W. Fisher Motions to Limit Future Notices

A compromise between “old” Diamond and its trustee Morgan W. Fisher and 15 publishers wasn’t the only bit of news today when it comes to Diamond’s chapter 7 process. Fisher also submitted an order limiting future notices in the case.

The order is interesting as it lays out a lot of information in the case that reminds us of the scope of the situation.

  • Diamond’s credit matrix initially consisted of almost 1,300 parties and when subscription comic book customers was added it was over 1,500.
  • 75 claims were filed for the Chapter 7 with the highest amount being Dynamic forces with $29,514,087.40 to $182 from Irish Holdings.
  • Omni Agent Solutions logged 742 claims in the main case and 71 claims concerning Diamond Select Toys
  • There were 759 unique claimants, 28 were governmental agencies.

The motion raises the difficulty and cost in notifying everyone every update about the case and there’s numerous other ways to get notifications like a Notice of Appearance and Request for Notices.

Fisher is motioning to limit notices to:

  • Counsel for the Debtor;
  • The Trustee and his counsel;
  • Secured Creditors;
  • The Debtor’s 20 largest unsecured creditors, based on filed claims;
  • The Office of the United States Trustee;
  • The Internal Revenue Service, and the Comptroller of the State of Maryland;
  • Persons who have appeared or filed a notice of appearance and request for service in the case (including persons served via CM/ECF);
  • Parties who are directly affected by a particular motion, paper or pleading.

The 20 largest creditors are:

  • Dynamic Forces, Inc.: $29,514,087.40
  • Alliance Entertainment, LLC: $10,008,534.05
  • Bandai Limited: $9,245,465.10
  • Penguin Random House LLC: $8,941,467.05
  • Passage Trading: $6,297,244.00
  • Oni-Lion Forge Publishing Group: $5,646,907.40
  • Udon Entertainment Inc.: $4,327,716.06
  • Valiant Entertainment LLC: $4,070,588.30
  • Disney Consumer Products, Inc.: $3,638,592.00
  • Creative Grand Industrial HK Limited: $2,960,931.87
  • Zenescope Entertainment, Inc.: $2,360,907.16
  • Fantagraphics Books Inc.: $2,279,330.68
  • MegaHouse Corporation: $2,150,730.00
  • Magnetic Press LLC: $1,957,576.53
  • TMP International, LLC: $1,774,558.48
  • Aftershock Comics, LLC: $1,767,573.53
  • ARA, Inc.: $1,229,027.36
  • Funko, LLC: $1,206,854.62
  • Action Figure Authority Inc.: $1,200,000.00
  • Hasbro, Inc.: $1,185,638.23

They’re also looking for permission to pay for the notifications without having to ask permission for each time they need to do so.

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

Diamond’s Trustee Morgan W. Fisher and some Publishers Reach a Settlement over Consigned Goods

It’s a hell of a new comic book day as court documents have been released as to a settlement between Diamond‘s trustee Morgan W. Fisher and a group of publishers concerning consigned goods being held by Diamond and Sparkle Pop.

To catch folks up, when Diamond declared bankruptcy, it held a large quantity of product in its warehouse that was on consignment. After some time, Diamond claimed it had a right to sell the consigned goods to help pay down its debt and that nothing would go to the publishers. The publishers claimed it was their property and that when Diamond declared bankruptcy it triggered a whole bunch of different things that would allow them to get their product back. This has gone on for about a year and a half that resulted in all sorts of off-shoot lawsuits and a lot of behind-the-scenes negotiations.

To make things even more complicated, some items were sold when they weren’t supposed to. Sparkle Pop, the company that took over “old” Diamond, deposited $840,151.00 into an account of which $669,410.00 represents sales of goods from the Consignment Group. In addition, Sparkle Pop has $417,496.00 for sales after May 15 2025 through February 13, 2026 of which $273,503.00 represents sales of the Consignment Group’s goods. Of that initial amount of the $669,410, $50,000 will go to the publishers with $619,410 going to the trustee but what is in escrow and owed to the other publishers not part of this group needs to be figured out and settled. The $273,503 will go entirely to the trustee. If it’s found Sparkle Pop sold even more than what’s known, the publishers need to pursue that at their own cost and 5% of any recovery from that would go to the Diamond trustee after expenses for the legal proceeding are handled.

Now, we have a resolution, a “compromise,” and from the cursory read, it seems like it’s pretty much what we expected the result to be.

The compromise in short is that a certain group of publishers will get some money for the product of theirs sold and will be able to get the product back but they’ll need to pay for packing and shipping. The compromise is similar to a deal cut between Image and Diamond (the money is the difference between the two).

What’s also big is that it terminates any distribution agreement that currently exists for these publishers with “old” Diamond. This in particular stands out:

The Trustee agrees and acknowledges that the Consignment Group Members were the owners of their respective Consignment Inventory at all times prior and subsequent to the Petition Date, and the TSA did not permit or authorize Sparkle Pop to sell, distribute or dispose of Consignment Inventory on behalf of either the Consignment Group members or the Debtors other than in accordance with the Distribution Agreements and at the Debtor’s sole and express direction.

Publishers that are part of the compromise:

Ablaze
American Mythology
Avatar Press
Battle Quest Comics
Action Lab

Drawn & Quarterly
Fantagraphics
Green Ronin Publishing
Hermes Press
Living the Line

Paizo
UDON Entertainment
Zenescope
BOOM! Studios
Dynamite Forces/Dynamite

There are some publishers who are noticeably missing from this list and have been participating in court proceedings up to this point.

The bullet points of key parts of the deal and we’ve put in bold the major ones:

  • The Court Registry Escrow not allocable to the Otherwise Represented Consignors shall be released to the Parties and distributed as follows: (a) Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) to the Consignment Group Members that are also members of the Ad Hoc Committee (to be allocated as it/they deem appropriate); and (b) the remainder to the Trustee (thus, the net amount to be paid to the Estates is $619,410.00).
  • The Settling Parties shall jointly move the Bankruptcy Court for an order directing that Sparkle Pop release the aggregate amount allocable to each Consignment Group Member from the SP Escrow, as set forth on Schedule 3 to the Trustee.
  • If not already rejected, all Distribution Agreements of the Consignment Group Members shall be deemed rejected as of the Effective Date of the Settlement and terminated in their entirety.
  • The Consignment Group Members will have the authority and are required to retrieve any and all of their inventory from the Warehouse, bearing their own costs of picking and packing such inventory.
  • Sparkle Pop is entitled to pick and pack the inventory identified by the Consignment Group Members, at rates comparable to what the Consignment Group Members can obtain from other third parties to complete the work. If Sparkle Pop declines to do the pick and pack work at comparable rates, the Consignment Group Members are authorized to access their Consignment Inventory and remove it from the Warehouse under the timelines set forth in the Settlement.
  • The Trustee, on behalf of himself the Debtors, releases and discharges the Consignment Group Members from any and all claims, causes of actions, obligations, and damages including, but not limited to, preference claims. Similar releases from the Consignment Group Members flow to the Trustee and Estates, subject to certain claims as described herein and in the Settlement. In other words, the releases are essentially mutual.
  • The Consignment Group Members are reserving all rights with regard to any additional claims against Sparkle Pop. In the event any Consignment Group Member recovers additional funds from Sparkle Pop on account of unauthorized sales of or shortages in the Consigned Inventory in excess of the Court Registry Escrow and SP Escrow, such Consignment Group Member shall pay five percent (5%) of any such recovery to the Estates, net of any legal fees and expenses required to collect such amounts.
  • In the event Sparkle Pop obtains a judgment against any Consignment Group Member for rent, storage, or similar charges with respect to such Consignment Group Member’s Consigned Inventory stored at the Warehouse, that Consignment Group Member shall have an Administrative Claim against the Estates in an amount equal to 25% of such claim.
  • In the event Sparkle Pop or the Consignment Group Members obtain a finding that any consignment inventory delivered by any Consignment Group Member was unreported as being sold by the Debtor prior to the Settlement, but was in fact sold by or at the Debtor’s direction, and paid to or for the benefit of Debtor, the respective Consignment Group Member(s) that delivered any such Missing Inventory shall be entitled to a chapter 7 administrative claim against the Debtors that is subordinate to certain other expenses and claims including any finally-allowed post-conversion administrative claims of Sparkle Pop, JP Morgan Chase and/or the Trustee’s professionals.
  • Within sixty (60) days after the Effective Date, the Trustee will file a notice of abandonment pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 554 as to the Consigned Inventory.
  • Within ten (10) days after the Effective Date, the Trustee shall assign to the Consignment Group all of his rights, title, and interest, without representation or warranty of any kind, in and to the CG Adversary Proceedings as plaintiff therein.
  • Within ten (10) days after the Effective Date, (i) the Trustee will file a notice of dismissal of the Denial Order Appeal (if not already resolved), and (ii) the Members of the Consignment Group, as applicable, will file a notice of dismissal of the CG Adversary Counterclaims.

But… there’s more!

The Consignment Group Members are entitled to file a “substantial contribution claim” for their legal fees and costs having to do with this fight.

Other consignors who are not part of this settlement as settling parties have to reach a resolution with the Consignment Group Members and its counsel on a fee and expense sharing arrangement. But, the Trustee and other consignors who are not part of this agreement could reach their own settlement.

What’s big, and why we thought there would be a settlement, it ends Sparkle Pop charging “old” Diamond and its trustee in what’s described as a “burdensome administrative cost.”

The Parties believes the Settlement is in the best interest of the Estates. It eliminates a burdensome administrative cost that is being asserted by Sparkle Pop with regard to the continued storage of the Consignment Inventory at the Warehouse; it relieves the Trustee from any further involvement in the CG Adversary Proceedings of the Settling Parties and the Appeal; it provides a substantial cash infusion to the Debtors’ Estate; and it protects the Consignment Group Members from further erosion of value of their Consignment Inventory as well as prevents the flooding of the market with respect to unauthorized sales of their inventory.

You can read all of the documents below and we’ll have more as this major decision unfolds:

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

Loading Viewer…

Expeditors International of Washington gets its Administrative Expenses Approved in Diamond’s Chapter 7 Case

It’s been rather quiet when it comes to Diamond‘s chapter 7 process. Our alerts have been filled up with notices of returned mail… and not much else. But, today saw a little bit of news with one order approved by the court.

Expeditors International of Washington has had its administrative expense claim approved. There was no objections to the motion according to the approval. Expeditors International of Washington is a logistics company.

The company will receive their claim amount of $266,855.15.

Loading Viewer…

The Ad Hoc Committee Officially Gets its Time Extension while Creditor Expeditors International of Washington are Given Instruction in Today’s Diamond Chapter 7 Update

Two updates have come in today (so far) for Diamond’s Chapter 7 process…

The first, and easiest, is the Ad Hoc Committee of Consignors‘ request to extend the time they could respond to recent motions by Diamond’s Trustee has been approved. The Ad Hoc Committee was able to respond on or before April 24 at 12:00pm ET…

And they did!

You can read their full response here.

The second update is an intriguing one and concerns money owed. Creditor Expeditors International of Washington is seeking $266,855.15 in payment. The court has instructed them to get the right filing in to make that happen looking for a “memorandum that explains the legal and factual justification for such a request.”

Court Instruction – Expeditors apparently seeks both (i) allowance of a Chapter 11 administrative expense claim in the amount of $266,855.15, and (ii) IMMEDIATE PAYMENT OF THAT CLAIM BY THE CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE. If Expeditors actually seeks immediate payment, it must file by May 15, 2026 a supplemental memorandum that explains the legal and factual justification for such a request under the circumstances of this case; otherwise, the immediate payment request will be denied. (related document(s)[1229] Application for Administrative Expenses filed by Creditor Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.). Responses due by 5/15/2026. (McKenna, Shannon)

Creditor Expeditors International of Washington is a logistics company. In February 2026, their motion for administrative expense was denied by the court. You can see that document below. They had originally filed for the amount but the Trustee was not yet appointed for the case to be served with the request. This is more an administrative bump, so we’ll see if there’s an official, updated request and of course, it’s more money that’s being asked of Diamond.

Loading Viewer…

« Older Entries