Category Archives: Politics

Congressman Pat Ryan calls for an FTC Investigation into Collectors Holdings’ acquisition of Beckett

Collectors

In mid-December, Collectors announced that it had acquired Beckett. Collectors is the company behind the grading service PSA while Beckett has its own grading service.

Congressman Pat Ryan has demanded the FTC investigate the acquisition calling it an “attempt to monopolize” the trading card grading market.

In the press release, Congressman Ryan has said that Collectors has consolidated 80% of the grading volume, leaving only on significant independent as a competitor. Along with a vertical integration, controls on grading capacity, pricing, and even purchasing and selling graded cards, there’s a severe conflict of interest.

He has called on the Commission to investigate:

  • Monopolization: Whether Collectors acquired SGC and Beckett specifically to eliminate competition, and whether internal documents reveal a deliberate strategy of monopolization.
  • Serial Acquisition Pattern: Whether Collectors’ systematic roll-up strategy violates Section 5 of the FTC Act as conduct that inherently produces the cumulative harms the antitrust laws were designed to prevent.
  • Regulatory Evasion: Whether Collēctīvus Holdings functioned as a pass-through entity to evade merger scrutiny, and the extent of Collectors’ involvement in the 2024 acquisition of Beckett.
  • Good-Faith Representations: Whether the post-acquisition marginalization of SGC was contrary to representations made at the time of the merger, and if those actions warrant a court-ordered divestiture or unwinding of the deal.
  • Erosion of Competition: How the elimination of independent rivals has directly impacted consumer pricing, service quality, and turnaround times across the industry.
  • Price and Policy Coordination: What safeguards, if any, prevent Collectors from coordinating pricing, grading standards, and competitive behavior across its three nominally “independent” brands.
  • Barriers to Entry: What structural barriers now prevent new competitors from entering the market, specifically regarding the control of the limited labor pool of professional graders.
  • Market Manipulation: How vertical integration — controlling the grading process, the pricing data through CardLadder, and the marketplace itself — creates unique opportunities for market manipulation and unfair self-dealing.

You can read Congressman Ryan’s press release here and letter to the FTC here.

Paramount Skydance Launches a Hostile Bid for Warner Bros. Discovery

Warner Bros.

The move was telegraphed with their press releases when the deal between Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery was announced, Paramount Skydance has launched a last-ditch effort to win out.

On Friday, a deal was announced where Netflix would purchase the Warner Bros. part of Warner Bros. Discovery for about $82.7 billion. Netflix would purchase the Warner Bros. film and television studios, HBO, and HBO Max. That leaves out Warner Bros. Discovery’s cable television properties which currently would be spun out into their own company.

Paramount is offering $30 a share, about $2.25 more per share than Netflix’s offer. That deal includes financing from Affinity Partners, the investment firm run by Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-on-law as well as multiple Middle Eastern government-run investment funds, as well as the Ellison family.

Paramount’s argument is that they would be purchasing all of Warner Bros. Discovery, while Netflix would be just purchasing part of it. It also argues the deal is in the “best interest of the creative community, movie theaters, and consumers.” There is concern of Netflix, the top streaming platform purchasing HBO Max, the third largest, and merging the two.

But, if Paramount Skydance succeeding, it would have its own consumer/antitrust issues as they would consolidate television and have a greater market share than Walt Disney Co.

There’s further concerns that the Ellisons have imposed a more conservative bent over their recent purchases including the appointment of conservative management over CBS News.

The x-factor in the deal is how much President Trump’s government weighs in on the deal. There are concerns from the creative community as well as on behalf of consumers that the Netflix purchase would have a negative effect. Add in that Paramount Skydance, and its owners the Ellisons are close with the Trump administration. There is the possibility that “the fix is in” and the government could oppose Netflix’s plan to throw the deal to the Ellisons by default, especially if Trump’s son-in-law is part of it.

Get Out and Vote

While the President and Congress aren’t on the ballot, numerous states are having elections today and we want to make sure you get out and vote.

For us, it’s clear how to vote with attacks on every institution threatening our nation, attacks on the rights of individuals, money flowing to oligarchs in a fleecing of the country and yet another transfer of wealth and leaders more focused on ballrooms, marble bathrooms, and lies than solving problems for the average person.

With a government shutdown perpetrated by one party that controls all level of government, we need to send a message that the state of things is not right and we need to respect the rule of law and elected officials need to do their jobs or step down.

We don’t reward hate. We don’t reward division. There’s a clear decision to make this election for those who get to vote. Vote to move this nation forward and not keep going backwards like we have this year.

If you’re still undecided, you can start and get more information here.

Disney Has a History of Bending to Anti-Democratic Government Witch Hunts

Disney has been roped into politics by the US government. They cooperate, throwing individuals under the bus to appease government officials leading an anti-democratic witch hunt. That describes recent events concerning Disney, ABC, and Jimmy Kimmel, as well as ABC cancelling Bill Maher’s Politically Incorrect in 2002 over comments Maher made concerning the September 11 attacks. It also happened nearly 80 years ago with Walt Disney front and center.

In October 1947, Walt Disney testified before the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC). During his testimony, Disney attacked union activities as well as individuals who he believed to be communists.

Disney appeared before the committee on October 24, 1947. HUAC was formed in 1938 to investigate alleged disloyalty by private citizens, public employees, and organizations suspected of having Communist ties. It was a standing committee until 1975 when the House abolished it and its functions were transferred to the House Judiciary Committee.

HUAC’s activities are often associated with McCarthyism and in 1947 it held a nine day hearing into alleged communist propaganda and influence on Hollywood. More than 300 individuals were boycotted by studios due to it and few were able to rebuild their careers.

In 1941, artists and animators at Walt Disney Productions went on strike over low wages, poor working conditions, and the company’s anti-union stance. It was organized by the Screen Cartoonists Guild and Disney saw the strike as a communist plot. Many, including Walt Disney, saw HUAC as an opportunity to attack the labor movement, which Disney clashed with, and had lingering anger over the strike.

During the hearing and his testimony, Disney named employees to be communist agitators including union organizer Herbert K. Sorrell and Art Heinemann, an art director on Fantasia, who was blacklisted due to his involvement in the strike. David Hilberman was another individual named by Disney. He helped found the Screen Cartoonists Guild and later left Disney to co-found United Productions of America. He was blacklisted after Disney names him. Disney was convinced that communists used labor unions as a front and were behind the 1941 strike.

The individuals named by Disney were eventually cleared of formal charges but many were blacklisted by Hollywood for years.

TESTIMONY OF WALTER E. DISNEY

Mr. SMITH: Have you ever made any pictures in your studio that contained propaganda and that were propaganda films?

Mr. DISNEY: Well, during the war we did. We made quite a few—working with different Government agencies. We did one for the Treasury on taxes and I did four anti-Hitler films. And I did one on my own for Air Power.

Mr. SMITH: From those pictures that you made have you any opinion as to whether or not the films can be used effectively to disseminate propaganda?

Mr. DISNEY: Yes, I think they proved that.

Mr. SMITH: How do you arrive at that conclusion?

Mr. DISNEY: Well, on the one for the Treasury on taxes, it was to let the people know that taxes were important in the war effort. As they explained to me, they had 13,000,000 new taxpayers, people who had never paid taxes, and they explained that it would be impossible to prosecute all those that were delinquent and they wanted to put this story before those people so they would get their taxes in early. I made the film and after the film had its run the Gallup poll organization polled the public and the findings were that 29 percent of the people admitted that it had influenced them in getting their taxes in early and giving them a picture of what taxes will do.

Mr. SMITH: Aside from those pictures you made during the war, have you made any other pictures, or do you permit pictures to be made at your studio containing propaganda?

Mr. DISNEY: No; we never have. During the war we thought it was a different thing. It was the first time we ever allowed anything like that to go in the films. We watch so that nothing gets into the films that would be harmful in any way to any group or any country. We have large audiences of children and different groups, and we try to keep them as free from anything that would offend anybody as possible. We work hard to see that nothing of that sort creeps in.

Mr. SMITH: Do you have any people in your studio at the present time that you believe are Communist or Fascist employed there?

Mr. DISNEY: No; at the present time I feel that everybody in my studio is 100 percent American.

Mr. SMITH: Have you had at any time, in your opinion, in the past, have you at any time in the past had any Communists employed at your studio?

Mr. DISNEY: Yes; in the past I had some people that I definitely feel were Communists.

Mr. SMITH: As a matter of fact, Mr. Disney, you experienced a strike at your studio, did you not?

Mr. DISNEY: Yes.

Mr. SMITH: And is it your opinion that that strike was instituted by members of the Communist Party to serve their purposes?

Mr. DISNEY: Well, it proved itself so with time, and I definitely feel it was a Communist group trying to take over my artists and they did take them over.

The CHAIRMAN: Do you say they did take them over?

Mr. DISNEY: They did take them over.

Mr. SMITH: Will you explain that to the committee, please?

Mr. DISNEY: It came to my attention when a delegation of my boys, my artists, came to me and told me that Mr. Herbert Sorrell—

Mr. SMITH: Is that Herbert K. Sorrell?

Mr. DISNEY: Herbert K. Sorrell, was trying to take them over. I explained to them that it was none of my concern, that I had been cautioned to not even talk with any of my boys on labor. They said it was not a matter of labor, it was just a matter of them not wanting to go with Sorrell, and they had heard that I was going to sign with Sorrell, and they said that they wanted an election to prove that Sorrell didn’t have the majority, and I said that I had a right to demand an election. So when Sorrell came I demanded an election.

Sorrell wanted me to sign on a bunch of cards that he had there that he claimed were the majority, but the other side had claimed the same thing. I told Mr. Sorrell that there is only one way for me to go and that was an election and that is what the law had set up, the National Labor Relations Board was for that purpose. He laughed at me and he said that he would use the Labor Board as it suited his purposes and that he had been sucker enough to go for that Labor Board ballot and he had lost some election—I can’t remember the name of the place—by one vote. He said it took him 2 years to get it back. He said he would strike, that that was his weapon. He said, “I have all of the tools of the trade sharpened,” that I couldn’t stand the ridicule or the smear of a strike. I told him that it was a matter of principle with me, that I couldn’t go on working with my boys feeling that I had sold them down the river to him on his say-so, and he laughed at me and told me I was naive and foolish. He said, you can’t stand this strike, I will smear you, and I will make a dust bowl out of your plant.

The CHAIRMAN: What was that?

Mr. DISNEY: He said he would make a dust bowl out of my plant if he chose to. I told him I would have to go that way, sorry, that he might be able to do all that, but I would have to stand on that. The result was that he struck.

I believed at that time that Mr. Sorrell was a Communist because of all the things that I had heard and having seen his name appearing on a number of Commie front things. When he pulled the strike the first people to smear me and put me on the unfair list were all of the Commie front organizations. I can’t remember them all, they change so often, but one that is clear in my mind is the League of Women Shoppers, The People’s World, The Daily Worker, and the PM magazine in New York. They smeared me. Nobody came near to find out what the true facts of the thing were. And I even went through the same smear in South America, through some Commie periodicals in South America, and generally throughout the world all of the Commie groups began smear campaigns against me and my pictures.

Mr. MCDOWELL: In what fashion was that smear, Mr. Disney, what type of smear?

Mr. DISNEY: Well, they distorted everything, they lied; there was no way you could ever counteract anything that they did; they formed picket lines in front of the theaters, and, well, they called my plant a sweat-shop, and that is not true, and anybody in Hollywood would prove it otherwise. They claimed things that were not true at all and there was no way you could fight it back. It was not a labor problem at all because—I mean, I have never had labor trouble, and I think that would be backed up by anybody in Hollywood.

Mr. SMITH: As a matter of fact, you have how many unions operating in your plant?

The CHAIRMAN: Excuse me just a minute. I would like to ask a question.

Mr. SMITH: Pardon me.

The CHAIRMAN: In other words, Mr. Disney, Communists out there smeared you because you wouldn’t knuckle under?

Mr. DISNEY: I wouldn’t go along with their way of operating. I insisted on it going through the National Labor Relations Board. And he told me outright that he used them as it suited his purposes.

The CHAIRMAN: Supposing you had given in to him, then what would have been the outcome?

Mr. DISNEY: Well, I would never have given in to him, because it was a matter of principle with me, and I fight for principles. My boys have been there, have grown up in the business with me, and I didn’t feel like I could sign them over to anybody. They were vulnerable at that time. They were not organized. It is a new industry.

The CHAIRMAN: Go ahead, Mr. Smith.

Mr. SMITH: How many labor unions, approximately, do you have operating in your studios at the present time?

Mr. DISNEY: Well, we operate with around 35—I think we have contacts with 30.

Mr. SMITH: At the time of this strike you didn’t have any grievances or labor troubles whatsoever in your plant?

Mr. DISNEY: No. The only real grievance was between Sorrell and the boys within my plant, they demanding an election, and they never got it.

Mr. SMITH: Do you recall having had any conversations with Mr. Sorrell relative to communism?

Mr. DISNEY: Yes, I do.

Mr. SMITH: Will you relate that conversation?

Mr. DISNEY: Well, I didn’t pull my punches on how I felt. He evidently heard that I had called them all a bunch of Communists—and I believe they are. At the meeting he leaned over and he said, “You think I am a Communist, don’t you,” and I told him that all I knew was what I heard and what I had seen, and he laughed and said, “Well, I used their money to finance my strike of 1937,” and he said that he had gotten the money through the personal check of some actor, but he didn’t name the actor. I didn’t go into it any further. I just listened.

Mr. SMITH: Can you name any other individuals that were active at the time of the strike that you believe in your opinion are Communists?

Mr. DISNEY: Well, I feel that there is one artist in my plant, that came in there, he came in about 1938, and he sort of stayed in the background, he wasn’t too active, but he was the real brains of this, and I believe he is a Communist. His name is David Hilberman.

Mr. SMITH: How is it spelled?

Mr. DISNEY: H-i-l-b-e-r-m-a-n, I believe. I looked into his record and I found that, No. 1, that he had no religion and, No. 2, that he had considerable time at the Moscow Art Theater studying art direction, or something.

Mr. SMITH: Any others, Mr. Disney?

Mr. DISNEY: Well, I think Sorrell is sure tied up with them. If he isn’t a Communist, he sure should be one.

Mr. SMITH: Do you remember the name of William Pomerance, did he have anything to do with it?

Mr. DISNEY: Yes, sir. He came in later. Sorrell put him in charge as business manager of cartoonists and later he went to the Screen Actors as their business agent and in turn he put in another man by the name of Maurice Howard, the present business agent. And they are all tied up with the same outfit.

Mr. SMITH: What is your opinion of Mr. Pomerance and Mr. Howard as to whether or not they are or are not Communists?

Mr. DISNEY: In my opinion they are Communists. No one has any way of proving those things.

Mr. SMITH: Were you able to produce during the strike?

Mr. DISNEY: Yes, I did, because there was a very few, very small majority that was on the outside, and all the other unions ignored all the lines because of the set-up of the thing.

Mr. SMITH: What is your personal opinion of the Communist Party, Mr. Disney, as to whether or not it is a political party?

Mr. DISNEY: Well, I don’t believe it is a political party. I believe it is an un-American thing. The thing that I resent the most is that they are able to get into these unions, take them over, and represent to the world that a group of people that are in my plant, that I know are good, 100 percent Americans, are trapped by this group, and they are represented to the world as supporting all of those ideologies, and it is not so, and I feel that they really ought to be smoked out and shown up for what they are, so that all of the good, free causes in this country, all the liberalisms that really are American, can go out without the taint of Communism. That is my sincere feeling on it.

Mr. SMITH: Do you feel that there is a threat of communism in the motion-picture industry?

Mr. DISNEY: Yes, there is, and there are many reasons why they would like to take it over or get in and control it, or disrupt it, but I don’t think they have gotten very far, and I think the industry is made up of good Americans, just like in my plant, good, solid Americans.

My boys have been fighting it longer than I have. They are trying to get out from under it and they will in time if we can just show them up.

Mr. SMITH: There are presently pending before this committee two bills relative to outlawing the Communist Party. What thoughts have you as to whether or not those bills should be passed?

Mr. DISNEY: Well, I don’t know as I qualify to speak on that. I feel if the thing can be proven un-American that it ought to be outlawed. I think in some way it should be done without interfering with the rights of the people. I think that will be done. I have that faith. Without interfering, I mean, with the good, American rights that we all have now, and we want to preserve.

Mr. SMITH: Have you any suggestions to offer as to how the industry can be helped in fighting this menace?

Mr. DISNEY: Well, I think there is a good start toward it. I know that I have been handicapped out there in fighting it, because they have been hiding behind this labor set-up, they get themselves closely tied up in the labor thing, so that if you try to get rid of them they make a labor case out of it. We must keep the American labor unions clean. We have got to fight for them. . . .

In the Age of Trump, Corporations Have Shown their Weakness. Let’s Exploit it.

Disney

This week, Disney owned ABC suspended Jimmy Kimmel‘s show indefinitely for jokes surrounding the murder of rightwing martyr Charlie Kirk. The suspension came after Nexstar and Sinclair both said they would not air the show in protest and threats by Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr of investigations. It is not only the latest example of government authoritarian overreach by the Trump administration, a clear violation of the first amendment, but further proof of the greed of US corporations who care only for further gain and further dollars. But, that also show’s their weaknesses. They are beholden to corporate profits. They don’t care about about causes, they care about how they can maximize their profits through those causes. We already generally knew this was the case, but it’s on full display and any pretense is gone.

Impact those profits with swift and deep boycotts and protests and change can happen.

The likelihood of deep nationwide work stoppages are unlikely, too many individuals live paycheck to paycheck, a reported 67%, and are beholden to their employers for benefits like healthcare. They don’t have vacation days to spend or the ability to take time off without putting themselves at risk. That is a “feature” of the current economic system, not a bug.

With the unlikelihood of sustained, multi-day, mass protests with economic impact, targeted boycotts are the next best option. Nexstar and Sinclair’s decision to “cancel” Jimmy Kimmel is performative outrage to gain favor with the Trump administration which they need to lift ownership restrictions when it comes to media. Nexstar wants to purchase Tegna which would increase its local TV ownership to more than 39% of US households, which is prohibited by law. They need the FCC to change this rule so they can have further control over the market, and thus, present a further danger to censorship. Nexstar’s actions are to curry favor by “punching libs” and do Trump’s dirty work for him. Trump has wanted to cancel Kimmel for some time. After the cancelation of Stephen Colbert, that reality became more into being. He said Jimmy Kimmel was next.

Nexstar, and Sinclair’s decision is about their dollars, their profits. Disney, the once champion of bullying others, has felt pressure in recent years, not just from Trump by also Governor Ron Desantis. Their decision was economic, Nexstar and Sinclair make up a large chunk of coverage, but also an attempt to bend the knee and appease MAGA.

This is about corporate mergers and increasing stock prices. It also is a further slide into fascism where corporate and government interests merge.

The economy is controlled by the state and used to serve the interests of the nation. Though claiming to help the common person, fascist regimes often align with powerful business interests.

So, how do we stop this? We make that stock go down. Disney, the owner of ABC, Nexstar, and Sinclair have shown their weakness by their worship of the dollar. By tanking revenue, we can directly effect change.

We’ve seen this in action.

Target announced their rollback of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives which lead to a nationwide boycott. The company reported a 21% drop in net income in the second quarter this year which was exacerbated due to the boycott and an already shaky business where it saw flat or declining sales in eight of the past ten quarters. It’s stock is down from a high of $142.50 in January to around $88.35 today, that’s a 38% decrease. The CEO of Target is stepping down, being replaced as the company has said it expects further decreases in sales as the boycott continues.

Target stock 2025

How would that work here?

Nexstar and Sinclair

For those serviced by these companies.. If you purchase anything directly from them, cancel what you can and let them know why you are. For those who have channels owned by either, find out what companies are advertising on their channels, especially local news, and then boycott those advertisers. But, you need to let those advertisers know you’re doing that and why.

Disney

Disney is a megalith of a corporation whose boycott needs to run wide and deep with different strategies for each.

  • ABC, ESPN, FX, Disney Channel – like Nexstar and Sinclair, stop watching the channel, find out who advertises on it and boycott the advertisers letting them know.
  • Disney+ and Hulu – Cancel your subscription and let them know why.
  • Marvel – Do not watch the films in theaters, on television, or purchase physical or digital releases. Do not purchase the comics. Don’t buy the toys and any licensed goods.
  • Dynamite, Dark Horse, and other comic publishers – Disney licenses properties to numerous publishers, do not purchase any of it.
  • Star Wars – Nothing related to the property should be purchased or consumed.
  • Movies – Avoid Fox, Pixar, Marvel Studios, Walt Disney Pictures, Lucasfilm.
  • Disney Parks – Don’t go, this is pretty simple.

That’s just a small sample of the level and here’s a pretty thorough list of the Disney empire. Individuals, including those in Hollywood, are already putting pressure on the company.

By weakening corporate profits, and making it clear why, we can make investors angry, who will in turn force the internal change we so desire and desperately need.

Silenced Voices: Reclaiming Memories from the Guatemalan Genocide educates through entertainment

In this moving intergenerational tale perfect for fans of Messy Roots and Illegal, Eisner-nominated creator Pablo Leon combines historical research of the Guatemalan Civil War with his own experiences as a Guatemalan immigrant to depict a powerful story of family, sacrifice, survival, and hope.

Langley Park, Maryland, 2013

Brothers Jose and Charlie know very little about their mother’s life in Guatemala, until Jose grows curious about the ongoing genocide trial of Efrain Rios Montt. At first his mother, Clara, shuts his questions down. But as the trial progresses, she begins to open up to her sons about a time in her life that she’s left buried for years.

Peten, Guatemala, 1982

Sisters Clara and Elena hear about the armed conflict every day, but the violence somehow seems far away from their small village. But the day the fight comes to their doorstep, the sisters are separated and are forced to flee through the mountains, leaving them to wonder…Have their paths diverged forever?

Story: Pablo Leon
Art: Pablo Leon

Get your copy now! To find a comic shop near you, visit http://www.comicshoplocator.com or call 1-888-comicbook or digitally and online with the links below.

Bookshop
Amazon


HarperAlley provided Graphic Policy with a FREE copy for review
This post contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links and make a purchase, we’ll receive a percentage of the sale. Graphic Policy does purchase items from this site. Making purchases through these links helps support the site

Warlord Games Offers Credit to Ease US Tariff Increases

Warlord Games

President Donald Trump’s increase on tariffs and the removal of the “De Minimis” tariff exception are impacting consumers forcing companies to increase prices to pass along the increased cost of getting goods to the United States. The “De Minimis” exception meant that goods under a certain amount were not subject to tariffs at all. That of course is impacting the game industry where numerous companies are located outside of the United States and a lot of the manufacturing occurs in other countries as well.

Warlord Games, a British game publisher, has announced a plan to ease the burden on customers due to the “De Minimis” tariff removal and increased cost to consumers in the US. The company is moving to a “Delivered Duty Paid” service for US customers. That means tariffs will be calculated and charged at checkout which will help ease delivery times through customs.

Warlord Games has announced it is crediting accounts the value of the tariffs charged on Warlord Games products once the order has shipped.

An example they provided:

  • Order total: $120
  • Tariff: $12
  • Total with Tariff: $132
  • Credit in account to redeem once shipped: $12

While it’s never ideal to raise prices and this tax on consumers will increase costs for those in the US, it’s at least one way to ease the impact.

For those who had pre-ordered products that wouldn’t ship until after August 29, Warlord will send them Delivered Duty Paid at no addition cost. Warlord is eating the cost in those cases and customers won’t need to do anything more.

Comics of the Movement #1 is some great comic and political history reprinting two classics

Reintroducing watershed publications from the social movements of the fifties, sixties, and seventies, Comics of the Movement connects modern readers to the comics which inspired and educated past generations. Featuring the first Black Panther in comics, the Lowndes County Freedom Organization comics are reprinted for the very first time–and are paired with the classic 1957 comic Martin Luther King and the Montgomery Story from the Fellowship of Reconciliation! Also contains additional historical and contextual material.

Story: Various
Art: Various

Get your copy now! To find a comic shop near you, visit http://www.comicshoplocator.com or call 1-888-comicbook or digitally and online with the links below.

Zeus Comics
Good Trouble Comics


This post contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links and make a purchase, we’ll receive a percentage of the sale. Graphic Policy does purchase items from this site. Making purchases through these links helps support the site

Comics of the Movement #1 is some great comic and political history reprinting two classics

Reintroducing watershed publications from the social movements of the fifties, sixties, and seventies, Comics of the Movement connects modern readers to the comics which inspired and educated past generations. Featuring the first Black Panther in comics, the Lowndes County Freedom Organization comics are reprinted for the very first time–and are paired with the classic 1957 comic Martin Luther King and the Montgomery Story from the Fellowship of Reconciliation! Also contains additional historical and contextual material.

Story: Various
Art: Various

Get your copy

Alberta looks to Censor Books Looking to “Find the Line” for “Age-Appropriateness”

Looks like the US is exporting something after all to Canada, book bans! Calgary‘s Education Minister Demetrios Nicolaides made a surprise announcement for plans to “find the line” for age-appropriate books for schools. The announcement was a surprise to both the Calgary Board of Education (CBE) and Edmonton Public School Board (EPSB) who are left scrambling after the decision. The books have been pulled from libraries in response to “review their content.”

Four graphic novels were referenced during the announcement. Nicolaides claims they contain mature contant such as depictions of sexual activity and nudity. The four graphic novels are Gender Queer, by Maia Kobabe; Fun Home, by Alison Bechdel; Blankets, by Craig Thompson; and Flamer, by Mike Curato. All of the graphic novels are regularly on “banned” lists in the United States.

On Amazon, Gender Queer is listed as 18 years and up on its “reading age” listing, Fun Home is 15 years and up, Blankets doesn’t have an age range listed, and Flamer is listed for ages 14 to 18 years old. Books are often listed with age ranges they’re meant for, this isn’t a new phenomenon.

Calgary is “consulting with parents” to create standards for what is and what isn’t appropriate for school libraries. So, make your voice heard to prevent the slippery slope these witch hunts turn in to.

While Nicolaides said:

I want to be clear right from the onset, this is not a question of banning specific books or specific titles, but rather, establishing clear policies and guidelines for all school divisions to follow.

We know that’s never the case and when given an inch, these sort of “think about the children” movements quickly slide into book bannings with fascist overtones.

Alberta doesn’t have a single provincewide standard to guide school boards leading to different approaches in what is chosen for school libraries.

Nicolaides’ press secretary said the books were found in 57 public schools across Calgary and Edmonton but didn’t disclose which ones with Nicolaides himself stating that ” many of these books exist in elementary schools.” As noted above, none of the books are listed as age appropriate for elementary schools.

The school boards, libraries, and Teacher’s Association said they were blindsided by the announcement and undermines the partnership they expect.

Feedback is being gathered through an online survey until June 6 and Albertans can provide input about what they believe is acceptable for school library collections. Really, the survey is open, so anyone can provide input… hint, hint.

The province doesn’t have the authority to “ban” books from school libraries and hopes to have new policies in effect by this September in time for the 2025-26 school year.

In the United States during 2023 and 2024, more than 10,000 book bans affecting more than 4,000 titles were put in place in the United States according to PEN America. In 2024, Canada saw 97 books challenged.

« Older Entries