<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: X-Men Origins: Wolverine Leak on Purpose?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://graphicpolicy.com/2009/04/02/x-men-origins-wolverine-leak-on-purpose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://graphicpolicy.com/2009/04/02/x-men-origins-wolverine-leak-on-purpose/</link>
	<description>Where Comic Books and Politics Meet...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:30:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: seanb</title>
		<link>http://graphicpolicy.com/2009/04/02/x-men-origins-wolverine-leak-on-purpose/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[seanb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphicpolicy.com/?p=850#comment-263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You get what you pay for.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You get what you pay for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeepThorn</title>
		<link>http://graphicpolicy.com/2009/04/02/x-men-origins-wolverine-leak-on-purpose/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DeepThorn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphicpolicy.com/?p=850#comment-262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I was wanting something darker too...  It was disappointing, but held some sort of ground still.  I don&#039;t get why they would want to make it like the first one, the first one was cheesy as hell, and this movie was pretty cheesy too.  They just didn&#039;t attack it right, and the acting just doesn&#039;t suit the characters at hand, especially gambit.

I think high up execs are the reason movies are blowing lately, and games.  Fox needs to just shut their mouth, and let the artists create their masterpiece.  I will admit, dark night was a little too dark for my taste, but it had power behind it.  None of the X-men movies have had power behind them because they have been too cheesy and dull.  This was the movie I was hoping would change it...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I was wanting something darker too&#8230;  It was disappointing, but held some sort of ground still.  I don&#8217;t get why they would want to make it like the first one, the first one was cheesy as hell, and this movie was pretty cheesy too.  They just didn&#8217;t attack it right, and the acting just doesn&#8217;t suit the characters at hand, especially gambit.</p>
<p>I think high up execs are the reason movies are blowing lately, and games.  Fox needs to just shut their mouth, and let the artists create their masterpiece.  I will admit, dark night was a little too dark for my taste, but it had power behind it.  None of the X-men movies have had power behind them because they have been too cheesy and dull.  This was the movie I was hoping would change it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

